Journals / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 22

Ottoman Legacy and New World Order

Osmanlı Mirası ve Yeni Dünya Düzeni

Pages
75–92
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Lastly, this study elaborates the main deficencies and shortcomings of the New World Order within the context of the reasons which lead to end the Ottoman ‘dream’.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the main trajectories of the Ottoman Empire, which had longed lived during the six centuries, and its cultural, political and economic legacy have been followed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, it has been aimed to analyze the influence of the Ottoman legacy over the New World Order as the recent socio-political system.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Lastly, this study elaborates the main deficencies and shortcomings of the New World Order within the context of the reasons which lead to end the Ottoman ‘dream’.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the main trajectories of the Ottoman Empire, which had longed lived during the six centuries, and its cultural, political and economic legacy have been followed. However, it has been aimed to analyze the influence of the Ottoman legacy over the New World Order as the recent socio-political system. This study also tries to establish a direct correlation between the globalization as the challeging phenomena of the existing world system and the ideal of the hegemony for the world under the rules and hypothesis of the world system analysis. Lastly, this study elaborates the main deficencies and shortcomings of the New World Order within the context of the reasons which lead to end the Ottoman ‘dream’.

Özet

Bu çalışmada altı asırlık büyük Osmanlı İmparatorluğunun kültürel, siyasi ve ekonomik mirasının izleği sürülmekte ve günümüzde Yeni Dünya Düzeni olarak isimlendirilen yapının bu mirastan ne yönde ve nasıl etkilendiğini analiz etmeyi hedeflenmektedir. Ayrıca günümüz siyasal konjonktürel yapılanmasına meydan okuyucu bir olgu olarak küreselleşme ile dünyaya nizam verme ideali ve iddiası arasındaki korelasyondan hareketle, bu argümanın ne ölçüde gerçekçi olduğu Osmanlı’yı sona erdiren nedenler bağlamında irdelenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

UYSAL, A., İNANÇ, H. (2022). Ottoman Legacy and New World Order. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 22, 75–92. https://ajindex.com/articles/493494

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Juan Jose Palacios, 2004. “Corporate Citizenship and Social Responsibility in a Globalized World.” Citizenship Studies 8(4): 383-402. 29.03.2006. Kiyoteru Tsutsui, “Global Civil Society and Ethnic Social Movements in the Contemporary World.” Sociological Forum, 2004, 19(1): 63-87. 27.03.06. http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=12513820. Donatella Porta, “Globalizations and Democracy.” Democratization, 2005. 12(5): 668-685. Edward A. Tiryakian, “Puritan America in the Modern World: Mission Impossible?” Sociological Analysis, 1982, c.43, sy.4, s.351. 28.03.2006. http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=sih&an=17590722. Norman K. Swazo, “Primacy or World Order? The New Pax Americana.” International Journal on World Peace, 2004, c.21, sy.1, s.15. 09.04.2009, http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=sih&an=14930245.
  2. Anthony A. Leiserowitz, Kates, Robert W. ve Parris, Thomas M. “Do Global Attitudes and Behaviors Support Sustainable Development?” Environment, 2005, c.47, sy.9. 09.04.2009, http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=18876954
  3. World Development Report, Dünya Bankası ve Oxford University Press. 2006. s. 43. 26.03.2006. http://wdsbeta.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/IW3P/IB/2005/09/20/000112742_20050920110826/Rendered/PDF/322040World0Development0Report02006.pdf Drew Tiene, “Addressing the Global Digital Divide and its Impact on Educational Opportunity.” Educational Media International, 2002, c.39, sy.3/4, 09.04.2009, http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=9039798. William James Stover, “American Leadership: Doubt and Suspicion in the Face of Power.”International Journal on World Peace, 2001, c.18, sy.4. 28.03.2006. http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=126188691&sid=9&Fmt=3&clientId=46713&RQT=309&VName=PQD
  4. Francis Fukuyama, The End of the History and the Last Man, New York: Macmillan, 1992. Francis Fukuyama. America at the Crossroads: Democracy, Power, and Neoconservative Legacy. New Heaven and London: Yale University Press, 2006, s.xi. Ann Swidler, “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies.” American Sociological Review, 1986, c.51, sy.2. http://www.jstor.org. 25 Şubat 2006. Mehmet Tayfun Amman, “Sosyal Tabakalaşma ve Günümüz Fransiz Sosyolojisinin Yaklaşimlari”, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi, 1995.
  5. Mete Tunçay. “İdeal Osmanlı Yok (Açıkoturum, İlber Ortaylı yönetiminde)”, Cogito, 1999, sy.241. İlber Ortaylı, Osmanlı Barışı, İstanbul: Da Yayıncılık, 2003, s.45. Ha