Journals / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 26

Evaluating relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth: Turkey example

Doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar ile ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi: Türkiye örneği

Pages
133–145
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a resut, VAR casuality test, varience decomposition showed that there exist a uni-directional causality relation running from FDI to GNP.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, on existence of a potential relationship between GNP, which is main indication of growth, and FDI was examined for the period of 1970-2007 yearly for Turkish economy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The mentioned relationship was investigated using E-vievs 5.0, Rats and SPSS package programs, stationarity test, Johansen-Juselius ko-entegration test, VAR causality test and varience decomposition were used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a resut, VAR casuality test, varience decomposition showed that there exist a uni-directional causality relation running from FDI to GNP.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, on existence of a potential relationship between GNP, which is main indication of growth, and FDI was examined for the period of 1970-2007 yearly for Turkish economy. The mentioned relationship was investigated using E-vievs 5.0, Rats and SPSS package programs, stationarity test, Johansen-Juselius ko-entegration test, VAR causality test and varience decomposition were used. As a resut, VAR casuality test, varience decomposition showed that there exist a uni-directional causality relation running from FDI to GNP.

Özet

Bu çalışmada Türkiye’de 1970-2007 döneminde ekonomik büyümenin temel göstergesi kabul edilen gayri safi milli hasıla (GSMH) ile doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar (DYY) arasında ilişki olup olmadığının ortaya konulması amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmada, E-views 5.0, Rats ve SPSS paket programları kullanılarak söz konusu değişkenler arasındaki ilişkilerin tahmin edilmesinde; birim kök analizi, Johansen-Juselius Ko-entegration testi ile VAR nedensellik analizi ve varyans ayrıştırmasından oluşan VAR analizi yöntemlerinden yaralanılmıştır. VAR nedensellik analizi, varyans ayrıştırmasıyla DYY’den GSMH’ye doğru tek yönlü bir nedensellik ilişkisi saptanmıştır. Türkiye’de doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar ile ekonomik büyüme arasında pozitif güçlü bir ilişki tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYAYDIN, H. (2022). Evaluating relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth: Turkey example. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 26, 133–145. https://ajindex.com/articles/493360

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. AKINLO, A. E. (2004), “Foreign Direct Investment and Growth in Nigeria An Empirical Investigation”, Journal of Policy Modelling 26 (2004) 627-639.
  2. ALFARO, L. ve CHARRLTON, A. (2007), “Growth and The Quality of Foreign Direct Investment: Is All FDI Equal?”, CEP Discussion Papers No 830,November 2007.
  3. ALFARO, L., CHANDA, A., KALEMLİ, Ö-Ş ve SAYEK, S, (2004), “FDI and Economic Growth: The Role of Local Financial Markets”, Journal of International Economies 64 (2004), 89-112.
  4. BALASUBRAMANYAM, S. ve M. SAPSFORD, D. (1999), “Foreign Direct Investment as a Engine of Growth”, The Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 1999, 8:1, pp.27-40.
  5. BALASBRAMANYAM, S. ve M. SAPSFORD, D. (1996), “Foreign Direct Investment and Growth ın EP and IS Countries “, The Economic Journal, 106 (January), 92-105.1996.
  6. BASU, P., CHAKRABORTY, C. ve REAGLE, D. (2003), “Liberalization, FDI, and Growth in Developing Countries: A Panel Cointegratin Approach”, Economic Inquiry, 2003, Vol.41,No.3, pp.510-516.
  7. BENGOA, M., B. ve SANCHEZ, R. (2003), “Foreign direct Investment, Economic Freedom and Growth: New Evidence From Latin America”, European Journal of Political Economy, 2003, Vol. 19, 529-545.
  8. BLATTNER, T. S. (2002), “Foreign Direct Investment in Transition”, Institute for Economic Policy and Economic History, Seminar Paper, (November 2002), pp.1-170.
  9. BORENSZTEIN, E, J. G ve J.W, LEE (1998), “How Does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Economic Growth?”, Journal of International Economics 45,1998, pp.115-135.
  10. CHAKRABORTY, C. ve NUNNEKAMP, P. (2008), “Economic Reforms, FDI, and Economic Growth in India: A Sector Level Analysis”, World Development, 2008, doi.10.10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.06.0. CARKOVIC, M. ve LEVINE, R. (2002), “Does Foreign Direct Investment Accelerate Economic Growth?”, World Bank Conference, may 30-31, 2002, Financial Globalization: A Blessing or a Curse CAMPOS, N.F. ve YUKO, K. (2002), “Foreign Direct Investment as a Technology Transfered:Some Panel Evidence From The Transition Economies”,The Manchester School, 2002, Vol. 70, No.3, pp.398-419.
  11. CHOE, J. (2003), “Do Foreign Direct Investment and Gross Domestic Investment Promote Economic Growth?”, Review of Development Economics, 2003,7(1), pp.44-57.
  12. DEĞER, M. K, ve EMSEN, Ö.S. (2006), “Geçiş Ekonomilerinde Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımları ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkileri: Panel Veri Analizleri (1990-2002)”,
  13. C.Ü. İ.İ.B.F Dergisi, Cilt 7, Sayı 2, 2006.
  14. DE MELLO, L.R.(1999), “Foreign Direct Investment-Led Grow