SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 31

The ımpact of the organızatıonal socıalızatıon tactıcs on socıalızatıon outcomes

Örgütsel sosyalleşme taktiklerinin sosyalleşme çıktıları üzerindeki etkisine yönelik bir araştırma

Ercan ERGÜN
Yunus Emre TAŞGİT
Pages
97–112
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Especially, the tactics that reduce organizational uncertainty and support self- investiture have an important impact on job satisfaction and organizational commitment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the study was to examine the impact of the organizational socialization onsocialization tactics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the result of research, there is a significantrelationship between organizational socialization tactics and socialization outputs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Especially, the tactics that reduce organizational uncertainty and support self- investiture have an important impact on job satisfaction and organizational commitment.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of the study was to examine the impact of the organizational socialization onsocialization tactics. Quantitive research method was used in the study and the survey data werecollected by using questionnaire forms. According to the result of research, there is a significantrelationship between organizational socialization tactics and socialization outputs. The findings suggestthat the tactics effects person’ organizational commitment, job satisfaction, role conflict and role clarityat significant level. Especially, the tactics that reduce organizational uncertainty and support self- investiture have an important impact on job satisfaction and organizational commitment.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, örgütsel sosyalleşme taktiklerinin sosyalleşme çıktıları üzerindekietkilerini araştırmaktır. Araştırmada nicel araştırma yöntemlerinden anket yöntemi kullanılarak verilerelde edilmiştir. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre organizasyonel sosyalleşme taktikleri (kurumsal sosyalleşmetaktikleri-bireysel sosyalleşme taktikleri) ile sosyalleşme çıktıları arasında anlamlı pozitif bir ilişkivardır. Araştırma sonuçları, her iki sosyalleşme taktiğininde (kurumsal ve bireysel sosyalleşmetaktikleri), çalışanların organizasyona bağlılığını, iş doyumunu, rol çatışmasını, rol belirliliğini anlamlıdüzeyde etkilediğini göstermektedir. Özellikle organizasyonel belirsizliği azaltan ve kendinigeliştirmeye imkân veren taktiklerin iş doyumu ve örgütsel bağlılık üzerinde önemli bir etkisinin olduğugörülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERGÜN, E., TAŞGİT, Y. E. (2022). The ımpact of the organızatıonal socıalızatıon tactıcs on socıalızatıon outcomes. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 31, 97–112. https://ajindex.com/articles/493261

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. ALLEN, N. ve MEYER, J.P. (1990) ‘Organizational Socialization Tactics: A Longitudinal Analysis of Links to Newcomers’ Commitment and Role Orientation’, Academy of Management Journal, 33(4):847–58.
  2. ASHFORTH, B.E. ve SAKS, A.M. (1996) ‘Socialization Tactics: Longitudinal Effects on Newcomer Adjustment’, Academy of Management Journal, 39: 149–78.
  3. ASHFORTH, B. E., SLUSS, D. M. ve SAKS, A. M. (2007) Socialization tactics, proactive behavior, and newcomer learning: Integrating socialization models, Journal of Vocational Behavior (70) 447-462.
  4. BAUER, T.N., MORRİSON, E.W. ve CALLISTER, R.R. (1998) ‘Organizational Socialization: A Review and Direction for Future Research’. In Ferris, G.R. (ed.) Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, Vol. 16. pp.149–214.
  5. BLAU, G. (1993). Work adjustment theory: A critique and suggestions for future research and applications. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 43, 105−112. CABLE, D. M., ve PARSONS, C. K. (2001). Socialization tactics and person–organization fit. Personnel Psychology, (54)1–23.
  6. CALDWELL, D. F., ve O'REİLLY, C. A. (1990). Measuring person–job fit using a profile comparison process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 648−657. CHAO, G.T., O’LEARY-KELLEY, A.M., WOLF, S., KLEIN, H.J. ve GARDNER, P.D. (1994) ‘Organizational Socialization: Its Content and Consequences ’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79: 730– 43. CRANT, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26, 435–462.
  7. FISHER, C.D. (1986). Organizational Socialization: An Integrative Review’. In Rowland, K.M. and Ferris, G.R. (eds) Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 4. pp. 101–45.
  8. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  9. FRENCH, J. R. P., CAPLAN, R. D., ve HARRİSON, R. V. (1982). The mechanisms of job stress and strain. Chichester: Wiley. GRİFFİN, A. E. C., COLELLA, A., ve GOPARAJU, S. (2000). Newcomer and organizational socialization tactics: an interactionist perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 10(4), 453– 474. GRUMAN, J. A., SAKS, M. A., ve ZWEİG, D. I. (2006). Organizational Socialization Tactics and newcomer proactive behaviors: an integrative study, Journal of Vocational Behavior, (74). 90–104.
  10. HAU, I ve CHOW, S. (2002). Organizational socialization and career success of Asian managers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 13(4) June 720–737.
  11. HAUETER, J. A., MACAN, T. H., ve WİNTER, J. (2003). Measurement of newcomer socialization: construct validation of a multidimensional scale. Jo