SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

LEADERSHIP IN PUBLIC SECTOR: A BRIEF APPRAISAL

Seçil ÇETİN
Pages
75–85
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, in the light of the presented issues, the article will end with future recommendations

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Leadership in public sector is accepted to be an important component of good governance in general and good public governance in particular.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, this article will present recent developments in leadership literature with a view to highlight significance of public leadership while also providing food for thought for public leadership in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, in the light of the presented issues, the article will end with future recommendations
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:liderlik · kamuda liderlik · Yeni Kamu Yönetimi

Abstract

Leadership in public sector is accepted to be an important component of good governance in general and good public governance in particular. In this context, this article will present recent developments in leadership literature with a view to highlight significance of public leadership while also providing food for thought for public leadership in Turkey. First, an overview of how the public leadership is perceived in international organizations like OECD will be brought into perspective. Second, taking into the vast scholarly literature on leadership, recent research on the theory and practice of leadership will be highlighted. Next, public leadership will be discussed in relation to recent developments in NPA context. Then, an overview of public leadership in local government will be presented. Finally, in the light of the presented issues, the article will end with future recommendations

Özet

Kamuda liderlik genel anlamda iyi yönetişimin ve daha özele inildiğinde de kamuda iyi yönetişimin önemli bir bileşenidir. Bu çerçevede makalede liderlik literatüründeki en son çalışmalar ışığında kamuda liderliğin önemi vurgulanacak ve Türkiye’de kamuda liderlik konusunda gelecekte gerçekleşecek olan tartışmalara ışık tutacak çalışmalar sunulacaktır. İlk olarak, OECD gibi uluslararası organizasyonlarda kamuda liderliğin nasıl algılandığı ele alınacaktır. İkinci olarak, var olan geniş liderlik literatürü dikkate alınarak liderlik konusundaki yakın dönemdeki teorik ve ampirik çalışmalar sunulacaktır. Daha sonra, kamuda liderlik Yeni Kamu Yönetimi anlayışı çerçevesindeki tartışmalar kapsamında ele alınacaktır. Bunu yerel yönetimlerde kamuda liderliğe genel bir bakışın sunulması izleyecektir. Son olarak, makalede sunulan bütün bilgilerin ve tartışmaların ışığında, geleceğe yönelik bazı önermelere yer verilecektir

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇETİN, S. (2022). LEADERSHIP IN PUBLIC SECTOR: A BRIEF APPRAISAL. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 75–85. https://ajindex.com/articles/493184

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Bass, B. M. (1996) “Is There Universality in the Full Range Model of Leadership?”, International Journal of Public Administration, Vol.19, No.6 pp. 731–761.
  2. Bass, B. M. (1990) Bass and Stogdill’s Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications, New York: Free Press.
  3. Bass, B.M. (1985) Leadership Performance Beyond Expectations, New York: Free Press.
  4. Bennis, W. and Nanus, N. (1985) Leaders: Strategies for Taking Charge, New York: Harper and Row. Burns, J.M. (1978)
  5. Leadership, New York: Harper and Row. Champy, J. (1995) Reengineering Management: The Mandate for New Leadership, New York: Harper Business. Conger, J.A. and Kanungo, R.N. (1998) Charismatic Leadership in Organizations, Sage Publications. Dubois, H.F.W. and Fattore, G. (2009) “Definitions and Typologies in Public Administration Research: the Case of Decentralization”, International Journal of Public Administration, Vol.32, No.8, pp.704-727.
  6. Hammer, M. and Champy, J. (1993) Reengineering the Business Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution, New York: Harper Collins. Hart, P. (2011) “Evaluating Public Leadership: Towards an Assessment Framework”, Public Money and Management, Vol.31, No. 5, pp.323-330.
  7. House, R.J. (1977) “A 1976 Theory of Charismatic Leadership” in Leadership: the Cutting Edge edited by James G. Hunt and Lars L. Larson, Cardondale, Illinois: Southern Illinois Press.
  8. Hunt, J.G. and Larson, L.L (eds) (1977) Leadership: the Cutting Edge, Illinois: Southern Illinois Press.
  9. Joyce, P. (2010) “The Role of Leadership in the Turnaround of a Local Authority”, Public Money and Management, Vol.24, No.4, pp. 235-242.
  10. Kanji, G.K. (2008) “Leadership is Prime: How Do You Measure Leadership Excellence?”, Total Quality Management and Leadership Excellence, Vol.19, No.4, pp. 417-427.
  11. Kotter, J.P. (2001) “What leaders really do?” Harvard Business Review, Vol.79, No.11, pp. 85-96.
  12. Lane, J. and Wallis, J. (2009) “Strategic Management and Public Leadership” Public Management Review, Vol.11, No.1, pp.101-120.
  13. Leslie, K. and Canwell, A. (2010) “Leadership at All Levels: Leading Public Sector Organizations in an Age of Austerity”, European Management Journal, Vol.28, pp.297-305.
  14. Meindl, J.R. (1990) “On Leadership: An Alternative Conventional Wisdom” In Research in Organizational Behavior, B.M. Staw and L.L. Cummings (eds) Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  15. OECD (2001) Public Sector Leadership for the 21st Century, Paris: OECD Publications. Osborne, S. (2006) “The New Public Governance?”