Journals / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 37

OKUL KUPONU REFORMU, GELİŞİMİ VE EĞİTİME ETKİLERİ: ŞİLİ ÖRNEĞİ

Pages
187–202
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that school voucher reform interacts with decentralization, different school sectors borne of voucher reform are socio-economically segregated, and that the reform could not deliver the expected nation-wide improvements in primary education to date

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article examines school voucher reform using the Chilean case.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In 1980, the Chilean military government introduced school voucher reform, which allows parents to enroll their children to private schools, nation-wide in its most complete form.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that school voucher reform interacts with decentralization, different school sectors borne of voucher reform are socio-economically segregated, and that the reform could not deliver the expected nation-wide improvements in primary education to date
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Eğitim Politikaları · Okul Kuponları · Evrensel Okul Seçim Sistemi

Abstract

This article examines school voucher reform using the Chilean case. In 1980, the Chilean military government introduced school voucher reform, which allows parents to enroll their children to private schools, nation-wide in its most complete form. The Chilean case presents us with a unique opportunity to understand educational vouchers due to the comprehensive and continuous nature of the reform. In this survey of the literature, fundamentals of school vouchers are first introduced, and the reform’s application and development in Chile are discussed. Moreover, in order to understand the vouchers’ impact on the education system, decentralization reform and institutional variables such as different school sectors and the rules that govern them are examined. The results show that school voucher reform interacts with decentralization, different school sectors borne of voucher reform are socio-economically segregated, and that the reform could not deliver the expected nation-wide improvements in primary education to date

Özet

Bu makalede okul kuponu reformu Şili örneği ile incelenmiştir. Şili askeri yönetimi 1980’den itibaren velilerin çocuklarını isterlerse özel okula yazdırmalarını sağlayan eğitim kuponu sistemini tüm ana özellikleri ile benimseyerek ülke çapında uygulamıştır. Uygulamanın kapsamı ve sürekliliği nedeniyle Şili örneği eğitimde kupon sistemini anlamak için eşşiz bir fırsat sunar. Bu literatür taramasında öncelikle ilköğretimde kupon reformu ana özellikleri ile tanıtılmış, Şili’de okul kuponu refromunun zaman içinde uygulanış ve gelişim süreçleri anlatılmıştır. Ayrıca, kupon reformunun eğitim sistemi üzerindeki sonuçlarının anlaşılması için bu reform ile aynı zamanda uygulamaya konulmuş olan yerinden yönetim reformu, farklı okul sektörleri ve bu sektörlerin uymakla yükümlü olduğu farklı kurallar gibi kurumsal değişkenler gerek konu ile ilgili araştırmalar taranarak ve gerekse ikincil veriler kullanılarak irdelenmiştir. Bu çalışmanın sonuçları okul kuponu reformunun yerinden yönetim reformu ile etkileştiğini, reform sonucu ortaya çıkan farklı okul sektörlerinin sosyo-ekonomik düzlemde ayrıştığını, ve neticede reformun kendisinden beklenen ülke çapında ilköğretimde iyileşmeyi bugüne dek sağlayamadığını göstermiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

ERİŞEN, E. (2022). OKUL KUPONU REFORMU, GELİŞİMİ VE EĞİTİME ETKİLERİ: ŞİLİ ÖRNEĞİ. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 37, 187–202. https://ajindex.com/articles/493146

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. BIBLIOTECA DEL CONGRESO NACIONAL. (1980). Constitucion Politica de la Republica de Chile de 1980. http://www.bcn.cl/leyes/pdf/actualizado/242302.pdf
  2. BIBLIOTECA DEL CONGRESO NACIONAL. (1980). Estatuto Docente. http://subvenciones.mineduc.cl/seccion/documento/2D2002040416132811094.pdf
  3. CARNOY, M. AND McEWAN, P. J. (2003). “Does Privatization Improve Education? The Case of Chile’s National Voucher Plan”. In D. N. Plank ve G. Sykes (Eds.), Choosing Choice: School Choice In International Perspective, (pp. 24-44).
  4. New York, NY: Teachers College Press. CASTAÑEDA, T. (1992). Combating Poverty: Innovative Social Reforms in Chile during the 1980s.
  5. San Francisco, Ca.: International Center for Economic Growth. CHUBB, J. E. AND TERRY, M. M. (1990).
  6. Politics, Markets, and America's Schools. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
  7. CHUBB, J. E. (2001). “The Profit Motive. The Private Can Be Public”, Education Next, 1: 1. COX, C. AND P. GONZALEZ. (1998). “Educacion: De Programas De Mejoramiento A Reforma”. In Rene Cortazar and Joaquin Vial (Eds.), Construyendo Opciones: Propuestas Economical Y Sociales Para El Cambio De Siglo (pp.233-277). Santiago: Cieplan-Dolmen. CLERT, C. AND WODON, Q. (2001). The Targeting of Government Programs in Chile: A Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment. World Bank, August. DELANNOY, F. (2000). “Education Reforms in Chile, 1980–98:
  8. A Lesson in Pragmatism, Country Studies”, Education Reform and Management Series, 1(1), Washington DC: World Bank. DEPARTAMENTO DE ESTUDIOS Y DESARROLLO. (2006). Anuarios Estadisticos. Capitulo_4. http://w3app.mineduc.cl/DedPublico/anuarios_estadisticos DEPARTAMENTO DE ESTUDIOS Y DESARROLLO. (2007). Guia de Subvenciones Educacionales. División de Planificación y Presupuesto, Ministerio de Educación. July. Santiago. http://w3app.mineduc.cl/mineduc/ded/documentos/Guia%20Subvenciones%202007.pdf DEPARTAMENTO DE ESTUDIOS Y DESARROLLO. (2012). http://data.mineduc.cl/
  9. ELACQUA, G. (2005): “How Do For-Profit Schools Respond to Voucher Funding? Evidence from Chile,” Occasional Paper Series National Center for Study of Privatization in Education, Teachers College, Columbia University. ELACQUA, G., D. CONTRERAS AND F. SALAZAR. (2008). “Scaling up in Chile”, Education Next. 8(3). ESPINOLA, V. (1993) “The Educational Reform Of The Military Regime In Chile: The School System's Response To Competition, Choice, And Market Relations," Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Wales College, Cardiff. FRIEDMAN, M. (1962). Capitalism and