Journals / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: EYİ 2013 Özel Sayısı

DETERMINANTS OF CAPITAL ADEQUACY RATIO IN SELECTED BOSNIAN BANKS

Pages
149–162
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results indicate based on data that SIZE, DEP, LOA, ROA, ROE AND LEV have significant effect on CAR.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The analysis of a data set of observation for 10 banks in period of 6 years in B&H shows how Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) is influenced by many factors such as: capital structure, size of the bank, profitability indicators, participation of deposits and loans in total asset, and leverage.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results indicate based on data that SIZE, DEP, LOA, ROA, ROE AND LEV have significant effect on CAR.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is hard to distinguish which CAR is better higher or lower, form stability aspect it is better to have higher CAR, but from profitability side lower CAR is more preferable, so the banks should decide based on this study which variable to use in order to reach targeted CAR level.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The analysis of a data set of observation for 10 banks in period of 6 years in B&H shows how Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) is influenced by many factors such as: capital structure, size of the bank, profitability indicators, participation of deposits and loans in total asset, and leverage. Selected variables are chosen on the previous research and analysis is done through several methods and some diagnostics tests are performed in order to determine the most appropriate model that explains determinants of CAR. Results indicate based on data that SIZE, DEP, LOA, ROA, ROE AND LEV have significant effect on CAR. On the other hand LLR and NIM do not appear to have significant effect on CAR. Variables SIZE, DEP, LOA and ROA have negative effect on CAR, while variables LLR, ROE, NIM and LEV are positively related with CAR. All variables except LOA and ROA have expected signs. It is hard to distinguish which CAR is better higher or lower, form stability aspect it is better to have higher CAR, but from profitability side lower CAR is more preferable, so the banks should decide based on this study which variable to use in order to reach targeted CAR level.

🔖

Cite This Article

DRECA, N. (2022). DETERMINANTS OF CAPITAL ADEQUACY RATIO IN SELECTED BOSNIAN BANKS. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: EYİ 2013 Özel Sayısı, 149–162. https://ajindex.com/articles/492991

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Asarkaya, Y. & Özcan,S. (2007). Determinants of capital structures in financial industries: The case of Turkey, pp. 91-109 in Büyüksalvarcı,A. & Abdioğlu,H. (2011). Determinants of Capital Adequacy Ratio in Turkish Banks: A Panel Data Analysis, African Journal of Business Management. Vol.5, (27),pp.11199-11209, ISSN 1993-8233 [Online] Available: http://www.academicjournals.org/ajbm/pdf/pdf2011/9Nov/B%C3%BCy%C3%BCksalvarci%20 and%20Abdioglu.pdf (May 15, 2012) Banking Agency of Bosnia and Herzegovina. [Online] Available: http://www.fba.ba ( June 3, 2012)
  2. Büyüksalvarcı, A. & Abdioğlu,H. (2011). Determinants of Capital Adequacy Ratio in Turkish Banks: A Panel Data Analysis, African Journal of Business Management. Vol.5, (27),pp.11199- 11209, ISSN 1993-8233 [Online] Available: http://www.academicjournals.org/ajbm/pdf/pdf2011/9Nov/B%C3%BCy%C3%BCksalvarci%20 and%20Abdioglu.pdf (May 15, 2012)
  3. Blose, L.E. (2001). Information asymmetry capital adequacy, and market reaction to loan loss provision announcements in the banking industry. Q. Rev. Econ. Finan., 14 (2): 239-258 in Büyüksalvarcı,A. & Abdioğlu,H. (2011). Determinants of Capital Adequacy Ratio in Turkish Banks: A Panel Data Analysis, African Journal of Business Management. Vol.5,(27),pp.11199- 11209, ISSN 1993-8233 [Online] Available: http://www.academicjournals.org/ajbm/pdf/pdf2011/9Nov/B%C3%BCy%C3%BCksalvarci%20 and%20Abdioglu.pdf (May 15, 2012)
  4. Chol, G. (2000). The macroeconomic implications of regulatory capital adequacy requirements for Korean banks. Econ. Notes by Banca Monte Dei Paschi Di Siena Sp A, 29(1): 111-143 Büyüksalvarcı,A. & Abdioğlu,H. (2011). Determinants of Capital Adequacy Ratio in Turkish Banks: A Panel Data Analysis, African Journal of Business Management. Vol.5,(27),pp.11199- 11209, ISSN 1993-8233 [Online] Available: http://www.academicjournals.org/ajbm/pdf/pdf2011/9Nov/B%C3%BCy%C3%BCksalvarci%20 and%20Abdioglu.pdf (May 15, 2012)
  5. Hassan, K. (1992). An empirical analysis of bank standby letters of credit risk. Rev. Fin. Econ., 2 (1): 31-44 in Büyüksalvarcı,A. & Abdioğlu,H. (2011). Determinants of Capital Adequacy Ratio in Turkish Banks: A Panel Data Analysis, African Journal of Business Management. Vol.5,(27),pp.11199-11209, ISSN 1993-8233 [Online] Available: http://www.academicjournals.org/ajbm/pdf/pdf2011/9Nov/B%C3%BCy%C3%BCksalvarci%20 and%20Abdioglu.pdf (May 15, 2012)