SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 48

HOW THE OWNER-MANAGER'S EVALUATE THEIR OWN IDENTIFICATION OF CORE-PERSONALITY ?: THE OWNER-MANAGER’S OF A SMALL ORGANIZATIONS IDENTIFICATION OF CORE-PERSONALITY ON SOME CONCLUSION

SAHİP-YÖNETİCİLER ÖZ-KİŞİLİK KİMLİKLERİNİ NASIL DEĞERLENDİRİYORLAR?: KÜÇÜK ÖRGÜT SAHİP-YÖNETİCİLERİNİN ÖZ-KİŞİLİK KİMLİKLERİ ÜZERİNE BAZI ÇIKARIMLAR

Hakan KARA
Pages
117–127
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As for the traits that have been made in the some conclusions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the owner-manager of small organization aimed to determine how they evaluate their identification of core-personality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data were obtained from 100 small owner-manager organization.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As for the traits that have been made in the some conclusions.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Öz-Kişilik Kimliği · Sahip-Yöneticiler · Beş Faktörlü Kişilik Modeli

Abstract

In this study, the owner-manager of small organization aimed to determine how they evaluate their identification of core-personality. Data were obtained from 100 small owner-manager organization. To determine identification of core-personality, Adjective Check List and Five Factor Personality Model is used. 15 point average of Adjective Check List to the scan list and the total of the average is taken. Using the sum of the mean, Five Factor Model of Personality personality that was founded on the front of the cross-correlations. The highest score in double identification of core-personality of small owner-manager, Responsibility (12,59) has the personality trait. This personality trait, respectively Agreeableness (11,11), Neuroticism (10,78), Extraversion (10,48) and Autonomy (8,06) personality properties has by followed. As for the traits that have been made in the some conclusions.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, küçük örgüt sahip-yöneticilerinin öz-kişilik kimliklerini nasıl değerlendirdiklerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Veriler 100 adet küçük örgüt sahip-yöneticilerinden elde edilmiştir. Öz-kişilik kimliklerinin belirlenmesi için Sıfat Tarama Listesi ve Beş Faktörlü Kişilik Modeli kullanılmıştır. 15 maddelik Sıfat Tarama Listesi’ne verilen yanıtların ortalamaları alınmıştır. Ortalamaların toplamları kullanılarak, Beş Faktörlü Kişilik Modeli’nin ön gördüğü kişilikler ile çapraz bağıntılar kurulmuştur. Küçük örgüt sahip-yöneticilerin öz-kişilik kimlikleri içerisinde en yüksek puanı Sorumluluk (12,59) kişilik özelliği almıştır. Bu kişilik özelliğini sırasıyla Uyumluluk (11,11), Duygusal Denge (10,78) Dışa Dönüklülük (10,48) ve Otonomi (8,06) kişilik özellikleri almıştır. Ortaya konulan kişilik özelliklerini yönelik olarak da çıkarımlarda bulunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARA, H. (2022). HOW THE OWNER-MANAGER'S EVALUATE THEIR OWN IDENTIFICATION OF CORE-PERSONALITY ?: THE OWNER-MANAGER’S OF A SMALL ORGANIZATIONS IDENTIFICATION OF CORE-PERSONALITY ON SOME CONCLUSION. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 48, 117–127. https://ajindex.com/articles/492794

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Ashton, M. C. (1998). Personality and Job Performance: The Importance of Narrow Traits, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19:289-303.
  2. Block, J. (1995). A Contrarian View of The Five-Factor Approach to Personality Description, Psychol Bulletein, 117(2):187-215.
  3. Block, J. (2001). Millennial Contrarianism: The Five-Factor Approach to Personality Description 5 Years Later, Journal of Research in Personality, 35:98-107.
  4. Costa, P. T. JR. ve Mc Crae, R. R. (1992). The Five-Factor Model of Personality and Its Relevance to Personality Disorders, Journal of Personality Disorders, 6:343-359.
  5. Craig, R. J., Loheidi, R. A., Rudolph, B., Leifer, M. ve Rubin, N. (1998). Relationship Between Psychological Needs and The Five-Factor Model of Personality Classification, Journal of Research in Personality, 32:519-527.
  6. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality Structure: Emergence of The Five-Factor Model, Annual Review of Psychology, 41:417-440.
  7. Domino, G. (1970). Identification of Potentially Creative Persons From The Adjective Check List, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 35(1):48-51.
  8. Duval, D. L., Williams, J. E., Patterson, D. J. ve Fogle, E. E. (1995). A ‘Big Five’ Scoring System For The Item Pool of The Adjective Check List, Journal of Personality Assessment, 65(1):59-76.
  9. Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The Structure of Phenotypic Personality Traits, American Psychologist, 48(1):26-34.
  10. Gough, H. G. (1979). A Creative Personality Scale for The Adjective Check List, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(8): 1398-1405.
  11. Gough, H. G. (1960). The Adjective Check List As a Personality Assessment Research Technique, Psychological Reports, 6(1):107-122.
  12. Hough, L. (1992). The ‘Big Five’ Personality Variables-Construct Confusion: Description Versus Prediction, Human Performance, 5(1-2):139-155. https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/, Erişim Tarihi, 10.12.2015.
  13. Kara, H. (2009).
  14. Yönetim Bilimin Düşünce İzleri, Kütahya:Üç Mart Basım. Ledesma, R. D., Sanchez R. ve M. Diaz-Lazaro, C. (2011). Adjective Checklist To Assess The Big Five Personality Factors in The Argentine Population, Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(1):46-55.
  15. Marcus, D. K. ve Lehman, S. J. (2002). Are There Sex Differences In Interpersonal Perception At Zero Acquaintance? A Social Relations Analysis, Journal of Research in Personality, 36(3):190-207.
  16. Mc Crae, R. R. ve Costa, P. T. JR. (1985). Comparison of EPI and Psychoticism Scales With Measures of The Five-Factor Model of Personality, Personality and Individual