Although the study is limited by its case study design, it provides valuableinsights into the democracy-economic development nexus.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The relationship between economic development and democracy has dominated academic discourses fordecades.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Exploiting a qualitative (case study) approach, this study examines theimpact of economic development on democracy in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan for the period 1991-2016.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although the study is limited by its case study design, it provides valuableinsights into the democracy-economic development nexus.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
The relationship between economic development and democracy has dominated academic discourses fordecades. The theoretical and empirical evidence remain ambiguous about the direction of causality or themagnitude of the impact on each other. Exploiting a qualitative (case study) approach, this study examines theimpact of economic development on democracy in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan for the period 1991-2016. Thestudy suggests that economic development in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan may not have had an impact on thecountry’s democratisation process. Although the study is limited by its case study design, it provides valuableinsights into the democracy-economic development nexus.
🔖
Cite This Article
ÇAĞLAYAN, S., TOPÇUOĞLU, E. (2022). IMPACT OF ECONOMİC DEVELOPMENT ON DEMOCRACY: A CASE STUDY OF KAZAKHSTAN AND UZBEKİSTAN FROM 1991-2016. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: afro-avrasya özel sayısı, 182–191. https://ajindex.com/articles/492670
Chen, B & Feng, Y 1999, ‘Economic development and the transition to democracy: a formal model’, Social Choice and Welfare, 16(1): 1-16.
Ciasc, R 2013, ‘Do democracy and economic development compose a requisite association?’, Analele Universitatii ‘Eftimie Murgu’ Resita, pp. 301-303.
Diebolt, C, Mishra, T, Ouattara, B & Parhi, M 2013, ‘Democracy and economic growth in an interdependent world’, Review of International Economics, 21(4): 733-749.
Djezou, W 2014, ‘The democracy and economic growth nexus. Empirical evidence from Cote d’Ivoire’, European Journal of Comparative Economics, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 251-266.
Doucouliagos, H & Ulubasoglu, M 2008, ‘Democracy and economic growth: a metaanalysis’, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 61-83.
Edwards, J & Thames, F 2010, ‘Growth volatility and the interaction between economic and political development’, Empirical Economics, 39: 183-201.
Gersbach, H & Siemers, L 2014, ‘Can democracy induce development? A constitutional perspectives’, Public Choice, 159: 177-196.
Haan, J & Siermann, C 1995, ‘A sensitivity analysis of the impact of democracy on economic growth’, Empirical Economics, 20: 197-215.
Huber, E, Rueschemeyer, D & Stephens, J 1993, ‘The impact of economic development on democracy’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 71-85.
Jaunky, V 2013, ‘Democracy and economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa: a panel data approach’, Empirical Economics, 45(2): 987-1008.
Krieckhaus, J 2006, ‘Democracy and economic growth: how regional context influences regime effects’, British Journal of Political Science, 36(2): 317-340.
Kubiszewska, K 2013, ‘A democracy and economic development in Western Balkan’, Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings, pp. 454-462. Libman,