Journals / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 58

The Nexus Between Tourism and Economic Growth in E-7 Countries: Asymmetric Panel Causality Analysis

E-7 Ülkelerinde Turizm ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Asimetrik Panel Nedensellik Analizi

Pages
130–142
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the empirical findings, it is concluded that there is a causal relationship between tourism revenues and economic growth.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Tourism, one of the most important sectors of the world economy, plays an important role in the economic development of many countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With globalization, the number of tourist visits to the four sides of the world is increasing; which leads to increased investment in tourism sector in developed and developing countries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the empirical findings, it is concluded that there is a causal relationship between tourism revenues and economic growth.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Ekonomik büyüme · turizm gelirleri · Economic growth

Abstract

Tourism, one of the most important sectors of the world economy, plays an important role in the economic development of many countries. With globalization, the number of tourist visits to the four sides of the world is increasing; which leads to increased investment in tourism sector in developed and developing countries. In this respect, tourism has become one of the fastest growing and most important sectors of the world. In this study where the annual data for the 1995-2016 time period are used, the relationship between the tourism incomes and economic growth variables of the fastest growing and developing E-7 countries is examined by the asymmetric panel causality method developed by Hatemi-J (2011). As a result of the empirical findings, it is concluded that there is a causal relationship between tourism revenues and economic growth. A positive shock emerged in tourism revenues caused economic growth. Besides, it has been found that tourism incomes tend to give a negative response in case of a negative shock in the economic growth variable.

Özet

Dünya ekonomisinin en önemli sektörlerinden biri olan turizm, birçok ülkenin ekonomik gelişiminde önemli rol oynamaktadır. Küreselleşmeyle birlikte dünyanın dört bir yanına yapılan turist ziyaretlerinin sayısı artmakta; bu durum gelişmiş ve gelişmekte olan ülkelerde de turizm sektörüne yönelik yatırımların artmasına neden olmaktadır. Bu sayede turizm dünyanın en hızlı büyüyen ve en önemli sektörlerinden biri haline gelmiştir. 1995-2016 zaman periyoduna ait yıllık verilerinin kullanıldığı bu çalışmada, en hızlı büyüyen ve gelişmekte olan E-7 ülkelerinin turizm gelirleri ile ekonomik büyüme değişkenleri arasındaki ilişki Hatemi-J (2011) tarafından geliştirilen asimetrik panel nedensellik yöntemiyle incelenmektedir. Elde edilen bulgular doğrultusunda, turizm gelirleri ile ekonomik büyüme arasında nedensel bir ilişki olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Turizm gelirlerinde meydana gelebilecek pozitif bir şokun ekonomik büyümeye neden olduğu; ekonomik büyüme değişkeninde negatif bir şokun yaşanması halinde ise turizm gelirlerinin negatif bir tepki verme eğiliminde olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ZORTUK, M., YILDIZ, A. (2022). The Nexus Between Tourism and Economic Growth in E-7 Countries: Asymmetric Panel Causality Analysis. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 58, 130–142. https://ajindex.com/articles/492603

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akerlof, G. (1970). The market for lemons: Quality, uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84: 485-500.
  2. Altıntaş, H., & Mercan, M. (2015). AR-GE Harcamaları ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: OECD Ülkeleri Üzerine Yatay Kesit Bağımlılığı Altında Panel Eşbütünleşme Analizi. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 70(2). Balaguer, J., & Cantavella-Jorda, M. (2002). Tourism as a long-run economic growth factor: The Spanish case. Applied Economics, 34, 877–884.
  3. Bramwell, B., & Lane, B. (1993). Sustainable tourism: an evolving global approach. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 1(1), 6-16.
  4. Breuer, J. B., McNown, R., & Wallace, M. (2002). Series‐specific unit root tests with panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics, 64(5), 527-546.
  5. Breusch, T. S. ve Pagan, A. R. (1980). “The Lagrange Multiplier Test And Its Applications To Model Specification In Econometrics”. Review Of Economic Studies, Blackwell Publishing. 47 (1), 239-253.
  6. Brida J.G., Pereryra, J., Risso W.A., Devesa M.J.S. and Aguirre S.Z. (2008). “The Tourismled growth hypothesis: Empirical evidence from Colombia”. An International Multidisciplinary Journal of Tourism, 4 (2): 13-27.
  7. Brida, J.G., and Pulina, M. (2010). “A literature review on the tourism-led-growth hypothesis”. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Working Papers Series 26. Chang, Y. (2002). Nonlinear IV unit root tests in panels with cross-sectional dependency. Journal of econometrics, 110(2), 261-292. Christopher A. Sims The American Economic Review Vol. 62, No. 4 (Sep., 1972), pp. 540-552.
  8. Crotti, R., & Misrahi, T. (2017). The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2017. Paving the Way for a More Sustainable and Inclusive Future. In World Economic Forum: Geneva, Switzerland. Cortes-Jimenez, I. and Pulina, M. (2010). “Inbound tourism and long-run economic growth.”Current Issues in Tourism, 13 (1): 61-74.
  9. Çetintaş, H., & Bektaş, Ç. (2008). Türkiye'de Turizm ve Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki Kısa ve Uzun Dönemli İlişkiler. Anatolia: Turizm Arastirmalari Dergisi, 19(1). Dumitrescu, E. I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450-1460.
  10. Granger, C. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and crossspectral methods. Econometrica, 37, 424–438.
  11. Granger, C. W., & Yoon, G. (2002). Hidden cointegration. University of California San Diego. Economics working paper series, 2(2002), 1-48.
  12. Hacker, R. Scott and Abdulnasser HATEMI-J; (2006), “Tests f