Journals / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 70

RISK ANALYSIS APPLICATION IN AVIATION SECTOR WITH INTUITIONISTICFUZZY TOPSIS METHOD

HAVACILIK SEKTÖRÜNDE SEZGİSEL BULANIK TOPSIS YÖNTEMİYLE RİSK ANALİZİ UYGULAMASI

Pages
97–111
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In problem solving, failures have been prioritized by experts with the support of linguisticvariables by using the Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS method.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is one of the risk analysis techniques often used in many industries torecognize, assess, and avoid potential failures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is not easy to appoint a mathematical number between 1 and 10 to risk factors by the experts anddecision makers who make the risk assessment.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In problem solving, failures have been prioritized by experts with the support of linguisticvariables by using the Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS method.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is one of the risk analysis techniques often used in many industries torecognize, assess, and avoid potential failures. Although FMEA is an analytical technique with strengths, such ashelping to identify and reduce potential risks in processes and products, and being widely used, it has been criticizedat some points. It is not easy to appoint a mathematical number between 1 and 10 to risk factors by the experts anddecision makers who make the risk assessment. At this point, the use of linguistic variables offered by the intuitionisticfuzzy logic approach provides convenience to decision makers and increases the accuracy of risk assessments. Thisstudy purposes to assess the risks that may arise throughout the production process of a company operating in theaviation industry with FMEA. Considering the possibility that risk factors are ignored and risk priorities cannot bedetermined correctly, intuitionistic fuzzy logic approach is integrated into the study. For this purpose, risk factors havebeen weighted by experts. In problem solving, failures have been prioritized by experts with the support of linguisticvariables by using the Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS method.

Özet

Hata Türü ve Etkileri Analizi (HTEA), birçok sektörde potansiyel hataları tanımlamak, değerlendirmek ve önlemekiçin sıklıkla kullanılan risk analizi tekniklerinden biridir. HTEA, süreçler ve ürünlerdeki potansiyel risklerinbelirlenmesine ve azaltılmasına yardımcı olması ve yaygın olarak kullanılması gibi güçlü yönleri olan analitik birteknik olmasına rağmen bazı noktalarda eleştirilmiştir. Risk değerlendirmesini yapan uzmanlar ve karar vericilertarafından, risk faktörlerine 1 ile 10 arasında matematiksel bir sayı atamak kolay değildir. Bu noktada sezgisel bulanıkmantık yaklaşımının sunduğu dilsel değişkenlerin kullanılması karar vericilere kolaylık sağlamakta ve riskdeğerlendirmelerinin doğruluğunu artırmaktadır. Bu çalışma, havacılık sektöründe faaliyet gösteren bir işletmeninüretim süreci boyunca ortaya çıkabilecek risklerini HTEA ile değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Risk faktörlerinin gözardı edilmesi ve risk önceliklerinin doğru belirlenememesi ihtimali göz önünde bulundurularak, çalışmaya sezgiselbulanık mantık yaklaşımı entegre edilmiştir. Bu amaçla risk faktörleri uzmanlar tarafından ağırlıklandırılmıştır.Problem çözümünde Sezgisel Bulanık TOPSIS yöntemi kullanılarak, dilsel değişkenlerin desteğiyle hatalar uzmanlartarafından önceliklendirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNLÜKAL, C., YÜCEL, M. (2022). RISK ANALYSIS APPLICATION IN AVIATION SECTOR WITH INTUITIONISTICFUZZY TOPSIS METHOD. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 70, 97–111. https://ajindex.com/articles/492399

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Arabsheybani, A., Paydar, M. M., & Safaei, A. S. (2018). An integrated fuzzy MOORA method and FMEA technique for sustainable supplier selection considering quantity discounts and supplier’s risk. Journal of Cleaner Production, 190, 577–591.
  2. Atanassov, K. T. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20(1), 87–96.
  3. Balaraju, J., Govinda Raj, M., & Murthy, C. S. (2019). Fuzzy-FMEA risk evaluation approach for LHD machine-A case study. Journal of Sustainable Mining, 18(4), 257–268.
  4. Ben-Daya, M., & Raouf, A. (1996). A revised failure mode and effects analysis model. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 13(1), 43–47.
  5. Bowles, J. B. (2004). An assessment of RPN prioritization in a failure modes effects and criticality analysis. Journal of the IEST, 47, 51–56.
  6. Braglia, M., Frosolini, M., & Montanari, R. (2003). Fuzzy criticality assessment model for failure modes and effects analysis. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 20(4), 503–524.
  7. Certa, A., Enea, M., Galante, G. M., & La Fata, C. M. (2017). ELECTRE TRI-based approach to the failure modes classification on the basis of risk parameters: An alternative to the risk priority number. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 108, 100–110.
  8. Chang, C. L., Wei, C. C., & Lee, Y. H. (1999). Failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy method and grey theory. Kybernetes, 28(9), 1072–1080.
  9. Chin, K. S., Wang, Y. M., Ka Kwai Poon, G., & Yang, J. B. (2009). Failure mode and effects analysis using a group-based evidential reasoning approach. Computers and Operations Research, 36(6), 1768–1779.
  10. Faghih-Roohi, S., Akcay, A., Zhang, Y., Shekarian, E., & de Jong, E. (2020). A group risk assessment approach for the selection of pharmaceutical product shipping lanes. International Journal of Production Economics, 229(April), 1–13.
  11. Fattahi, R., & Khalilzadeh, M. (2018). Risk evaluation using a novel hybrid method based on FMEA, extended MULTIMOORA, and AHP methods under fuzzy environment. Safety Science, 102(October 2017), 290–300.
  12. Garvey, P. R. (2008). Analytical methods for risk management. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC. Gilchrist, W. (1993). Modelling failure modes and effects analysis. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 10(5), 16–23.
  13. Guo, Q., Sheng, K., Wang, Z., Zhang, X., Yang, H., & Miao, R. (2017). Research on element importance of shafting installation based on QFD and FMEA. Procedia Engineering, 174, 677–685.
  14. Hu, K. C., & Hsiao, M. W. (201