Journals / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 69

THE IMPACT OF TEAM-MEMBER EXCHANGE ON THE INTRA-TEAM KNOWLEDGE SHARING: THE ROLE OF INTRA-TEAM TRUST AND PSYCHOLOGICAL OWNERSHIP

TAKIM-ÜYE DEĞİŞİMİNİN TAKIM İÇİ BİLGİ PAYLAŞIMINA ETKİSİ: TAKIM İÇİ GÜVEN VE PSİKOLOJİK SAHİPLENMENİN ROLÜ

Pages
268–285
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the research, teammember exchange has positive impact on intra-team knowledge sharing process.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the globalising world, knowledge is accepted as the most important source of competition.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Significant responsibilities fall upon managers and team members with relation to share of knowledge owned by the employees.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the research, teammember exchange has positive impact on intra-team knowledge sharing process.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In the globalising world, knowledge is accepted as the most important source of competition. Ownership and effective management of knowledge by the businesses are of great importance in terms of maintaining their existence. In this context, knowledge sharing by the employees with the organisation is of vital importance for the success of the businesses and it is also a moral responsibility. Significant responsibilities fall upon managers and team members with relation to share of knowledge owned by the employees. In this study, it has been aimed to measure the impact of team-member exchange on intra-team knowledge sharing process and to discover empirically the roles of intra-team trust and psychological ownership in such relation. In this line, data have been collected from 179 employees (29 teams) of an establishment operating in various sectors in Istanbul. According to the results of the research, teammember exchange has positive impact on intra-team knowledge sharing process. Moreover, intra-team trust and psychological ownership have positive impact on intra-team knowledge sharing and they have a moderating role in the relation between team-member exchange and intra-team knowledge sharing. Keywords: Team-Member Exchange, Intra-Team Knowledge Sharing, Intra-Team

Özet

Küreselleşen dünyada, bilgi rekabetin en önemli kaynağı olarak kabul edilmektedir. İşletmelerin bilgiye sahip olması ve etkin bir şekilde yönetebilmesi, varlığını devam ettirebilmesi açısından son derece önemlidir. Bu bağlamda, çalışanların sahip olduğu bilgiyi örgüt ile paylaşması, işletmenin başarısı için hayati öneme sahip olmakla birlikte, aynı zamanda ahlaki bir sorumluluğudur. Çalışanların sahip olduğu bilgiyi paylaşması noktasında yöneticilere ve takım üyelerine büyük görev düşmektedir. Bu çalışmada, takım-üye değişiminin, takım içi bilgi paylaşımına olan etkisini ölçmek ve bu ilişkide ampirik olarak takım içi güven ve psikolojik sahiplenmenin rolünü keşfetmek amaçlanmaktadır. Bu doğrultuda, İstanbul’da çeşitli sektörlerde faaliyet gösteren bir işletmenin 179 çalışanından (29 takım) veriler toplanmıştır. Araştırma sonucuna göre, takım-üye değişiminin takım içi bilgi paylaşımına olumlu etkisi bulunmaktadır. Ayrıca, takım içi güven ve psikolojik sahiplenmenin takım içi bilgi paylaşımına olumlu etkisi bulunmakta ve takım-üye değişimi ve takım içi bilgi paylaşımı arasındaki ilişkide moderatör rolü bulunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DÜGER, Y. S. (2022). THE IMPACT OF TEAM-MEMBER EXCHANGE ON THE INTRA-TEAM KNOWLEDGE SHARING: THE ROLE OF INTRA-TEAM TRUST AND PSYCHOLOGICAL OWNERSHIP. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 69, 268–285. https://ajindex.com/articles/492394

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Al-Alawi, A.L., Al-Marzooqi, N.Y. & Mohammed, Y.F. (2007). Organizational culture and knowledge sharing: critical success factors. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(2), 22- 42. Andrews, K. M. & Delahaye, B. L. (2000). Influences on knowledge processes in organizational learning: The psychological filter. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 797-810.
  2. Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Crossley, C. D., & Luthans, F. (2009). Psychological ownership: Theoretical extensions, measurement and relation to work outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(2), 173-191.
  3. Bartol, K. M. & Srivastava, A. (2002). Encouraging knowledge sharing: The role of organizational reward systems. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(1): 64-77.
  4. Cabrera, A., Collins, W. & Salgado, J. (2006). Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(2), 245- 264. Chae, S., Seo, Y. & Lee, K.C. (2015). Effects of task complexity on individual creativity through knowledge interaction: A comparison of temporary and permanent teams. Computers in Human Behavior, 42,138-148.
  5. Chen, C.-J. & Hung, S.-W. (2010). To give or to receive? Factors influencing members’ knowledge sharing and community promotion in professional virtual communities. Information & Management, 47(4), 226-236.
  6. Chen, Z. (2018). A literature review of team-member exchange and prospects. Journal of Service Science and Management, 11, 433-454.
  7. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2016). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları, (4. Baskı), Ankara:
  8. Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
  9. Cook, J. & Wall, T. (1980). New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfilment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53(1), 39-52.
  10. Costa, A.C. (2003). Work team trust and effectiveness. Personnel Review, 32(5), 605-622.
  11. Dansereau, F., Graen, G. & Haga, W.J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: a longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(1), 46-78.
  12. De Jong, B. A. & Elfring, T. (2010). How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams? the mediating role of reflexivity, monitoring, and effort. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 535-549.
  13. DeOrtentiis, P. S., Summers, J. K., Ammeter, A. P., Douglas, C. & Ferris, G. R. (2013). Cohesion and satisfaction as mediators of the team trust – team effect