Journals / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 69

THE MEDIATING ROLE OF INTRINSIC MOTIVATION IN THE ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTITY-IN ROLE AND EXTRA ROLE PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIP

ÖRGÜTSEL KİMLİK-ROL İÇİ VE ROL DIŞI PERFORMANS İLİŞKİSİNDE İÇSEL GÜDÜLENMENİN ARACILIK ROLÜ

Pages
135–152
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that merely the affective-attachment to organization increases in-role and extra-role performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main purpose of the study is to examine the effects of organizational identity on in-role and extra-role performance, and to explore the possible mediating role of intrinsic motivation in this process.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data were collected from 592 academic staff using the survey method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that merely the affective-attachment to organization increases in-role and extra-role performance.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The main purpose of the study is to examine the effects of organizational identity on in-role and extra-role performance, and to explore the possible mediating role of intrinsic motivation in this process. The data were collected from 592 academic staff using the survey method. The relationship between study variables was investigated by correlation and structural equation modeling analyses. Moreover, the mediation tests were conducted for determining the indirect effects among variables. The results showed that merely the affective-attachment to organization increases in-role and extra-role performance. We couldn’t find any significant effects of other sub-dimensions i.e. selfcategorization, the goodness of fit, and behavioral involvement on in-role and extra-role performance. What’s more it was found that the relationship between affective-attachment and in-role performance is mediated by intrinsic motivation. All these findings were discussed based on theoretical and cultural context.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, örgütsel kimliğin rol içi ve rol dışı performansa olan etkisini incelemek ve bu süreçte içsel güdülenmenin rolünü araştırmaktır. Anket yöntemiyle 592 akademik personelden veri toplanan araştırmada değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiler için korelasyon analizi ve hipotez testleri için yapısal eşitlik modelleri kurulmuştur. Ayrıca değişkenler arasındaki dolaylı etkilerin belirlenmesi için aracılık testi yapılmıştır. Bulgular, örgüte duygusal bağlılığın hem rol içi hem de rol dışı performansı artırdığını göstermiştir. Diğer örgütsel kimlik alt boyutları olan kendi kendine kategorizasyon, uyum/örtüşme düzeyi ve davranışsal katılım alt boyutlarının performans üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisi bulunamamıştır. Bunun ötesinde örgüte duygusal bağlılık-rol içi performans ilişkisine içsel güdülenmenin aracılık ettiği tespit edilmiştir. Tüm bulgular teorik ve kültürel bağlamda tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇETİN, F., ÇELEBİ, M. A. (2022). THE MEDIATING ROLE OF INTRINSIC MOTIVATION IN THE ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTITY-IN ROLE AND EXTRA ROLE PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIP. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 69, 135–152. https://ajindex.com/articles/492389

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 263-295.
  2. Amabile, T. M. (1993). Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 3(3), 185– 201. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.ObO13e31812e5535
  3. Ayçiçeği-Dinn, A., & Caldwell-Harris, C. L. (2011). Individualism–collectivism among Americans, Turks and Turkish immigrants to the US. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(1), 9-16.
  4. Battistelli, A., Galletta, M., Portoghese, I., Pohl, S., & Odoardi, C. (2013). Promoting organizational citizenship behaviors: The mediating role of intrinsic work motivation, Le Travail Humain, 76(3), 205–226.
  5. Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. (2009). Testing and extending the group engagement model: Linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013935
  6. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt, & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71–98).
  7. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Borman, W. C., & Motowildo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10(2), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002
  8. Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 475–482.
  9. Brewer, M. B. (2010). Intergroup relations. Oxford University Press.
  10. Brief, A. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. The Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 710–725. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/258391
  11. Burke, P. J. (1991). Identity processes and social stress. American Sociological Review, 56(6), 836–849.
  12. Çelebi, M. A. (2019). Algılanan örgütsel kimliğin ve içsel-dışsal güdülenmenin rol içi ve rol dışı performansa etkileri: Konya Ovası Projesi Bölgesi üniversitelerinde bir araştırma. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi.
  13. Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-Year meta-analysis. Psycholo