Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 1

From Prophetic Niche to the Five Pillars of Wisdom: On the Nature of the History

Mişkât-ı Nübüvvetten Hikmetin Beş Sütununa: İslam Felsefe Tarihinin Mâhiyeti ve Dinî Muhtevası Üzerine

Pages
195–212
Publication Date
2010-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Focusing on the earliest works of Muslim authors on the beginning of philosophy in Greek antiquity and its journey to early Islamic times and lands, the article examines the inner formative forces that caused Muslim thinkers to become interested in Greek philosophy and its leading historical personalities

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:of Islamic Philosophy and its Religious Content.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This article analyzes the earliest Muslim philosophers’ reception and conception of history of philosophy and its relation to prophetic traditions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Focusing on the earliest works of Muslim authors on the beginning of philosophy in Greek antiquity and its journey to early Islamic times and lands, the article examines the inner formative forces that caused Muslim thinkers to become interested in Greek philosophy and its leading historical personalities
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İslam Felsefesi · Arapça Felsefe · Hz. Davud

Abstract

of Islamic Philosophy and its Religious Content. This article analyzes the earliest Muslim philosophers’ reception and conception of history of philosophy and its relation to prophetic traditions. Focusing on the earliest works of Muslim authors on the beginning of philosophy in Greek antiquity and its journey to early Islamic times and lands, the article examines the inner formative forces that caused Muslim thinkers to become interested in Greek philosophy and its leading historical personalities

Özet

Bu makale erken dönem İslam felsefe tarihi metinleri temelinde, bu felsefî geleneğin teşekkül devri filozoflarının felsefe tarihi tevarus ve tasavvurlarını tahlil etmektedir. Bu hususta Batılı ilmî muhitlerce ortaya konan çalışmalar üzerinde durarak İslam felsefesinin mahiyeti, temel hususiyetleri ve tarihi unsurları hakkında değerlendirmelerde bulunmaktadır. Makale bu mevzu hakkındaki eserlerde ihmal edilegelen Ŧabaķât literatürüne araştırmacıların dikkatini çekerek bu ilmî malzemenin insanlık tefekkür tarihine getirebileceği zenginlik ve açılımlardan bahsetmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

YAMAN, H. (2010). From Prophetic Niche to the Five Pillars of Wisdom: On the Nature of the History. Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 1, 195–212. https://ajindex.com/articles/491015

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. El-‘Âmirî, Ebû’l-Ĥasan Muĥammed b. Yûsuf, Kitâbu’l-Emed ‘ale’l-ebed, tah. Everett Rowson, American Oriental Series 70, New Have, 1988.
  2. Berman, Lawrence, “The Political Interpretation of the Maxim: The Purpose of Philosophy is the Imitation of God,” Studia Islamica, 15 (1961), ss. 53-61.
  3. Corbin, Henry, History of Islamic Philosophy, terc. Liadain Sherrard, London, 1993. _____, Avicenna and the Visionary Recital, terc. W. R. Trask, Irving, 1980. El-Endelusî, Śâ‘id, Kitâb Ŧabaqâtu’l-umam, tah. Louis Cheiħo, Beyrut, 1912. El- Fârâbî, Taĥśîlu’s-sa‘âde, Haydarabad, 1926. _____, Risâle fî Žuhûri’l-felsefe, İbn Ebî Uśaybi‘a, ‘Uyûnu’l-enbâ’ fî ŧabaķâti’l-eŧıbbâ’, tah. Nizâr Riđâ, Beyrut, 1965 içinde, ss. 604-605.
  4. Gutas, Dimitri, Greek Wisdom Literature in Arabic Translation, New Heaven: 1975. _____, “Avicenna’s Eastern (‘Oriental’) Philosophy: Nature, Contents, Transmission,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy, 10 (2000), ss. 159-180. _____, “The Study of Arabic Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: An Essay on the Historiog- raphy of Arabic Philosophy,” British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 29:1 (2002), ss. 5-25.
  5. Hodgson, Marshall, The Venture of Islam, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974. İbn Culcul, Ŧabaķâtu’l-eŧibbâ’ ve’l-ĥukemâ’, tah. Fu’âd Seyyid, Kahire, 1955. İbn Ebî Uśaybi‘a, ‘Uyûnu’l-enbâ’ fî ŧabaķâti’l-eŧıbbâ’, tah. Nizâr Riđâ, Beyrut, 1965. İbn Ħaldûn, el-Muķaddime, tah. ‘Alî ‘Abdulvâĥid Vâfî, (Kahire: 1960). İbn Hindû, Ebû’l-Ferec, el-Kelim al-rûĥâniyye mine’l-ĥikemi’l-Yûnâniyye, tah. Muĥammed Calûb el-Ferĥân, Beyrut: 2001. İbnu’l-Ķıfŧî, Târîħu’l-ĥukemâ’, tah. Julius Lippert, Leipzig, 1903. İbn Sînâ, Manŧıķu’l-meşriķıyyîn, tah. Şukrî el-Neccâr, Beyrut, 1982. _____, Risâle fî iŝbâti’n-nubuvve, tah. Michael Marmura, Beyrut, 1991. _____, ‘Uyûnu’l-ĥikme, tah. Muvaffaķ el-Cebr, Dimesķ, 1996. El-Kindî, Ebû Yûsuf Ya‘kûb b. Isĥâķ, Resâ’ilu’l-Kindî el-felsefiyye, tah. Muĥammed ‘Abddulhâdî Ebû Rîde, Kahire, 1950. El-Mubeşşir b. Fâtik, Muħtâru’l-ĥikem ve-meĥâsinu’l-kelim, tah. ‘Abdurraĥmân Bedevî, Beyrut, 1980.
  6. Nasr, Seyyed Hossein, “Ibn Sīnā’s ‘Oriental Philosophy’,” Seyyed Hossein Nasr and Oliver Leaman (ed.) History of Islamic Philosophy, London, 2001, ss. 247-251. _____, An Introduction to Islamic Cosmological Doctrines, Albany, 1993. El-Shahrastânî, ‘Abdulkerîm, Kitâbu’l-Milel ve’n-niĥal, tah. Muĥammed b. Fetĥullâh Bedrân, Kahire, 1956. El-Sicistânî el-Manŧıķî, Ebû Suleymân, Munteħab Śıvânu’l-ĥikme, tah. D. M. Dunlop, The Ha- gue, 1979.
  7. Terkan, Fehrull