SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Çokuluslu Şirketler ve Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırım Teorileri Üzerine Bir İnceleme ve Değerlendirme

A Reiview and Assessment of Theories of the Multinational Companies (MNCs) and Foreign Direct Investment $(FDI)^+$

Harun KAYA
Pages
196–214
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Not only we have presented origins and main arguments of these theories but also we have, to some extend, evaluated the strengths and weaknesses of them.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Since the departure of the field of International Business (IB) from international economics orientation various theoretical perspectives of IB was built by taking into account other business related disciplines.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this article, we have concentrated on main theories of FDI and MNCs, namely, market imperfection and oligopolistic reaction theories, product cycle theory (PCT), internalization theory (IT), eclectic (OLI) theory, incremental (Uppsala) theory (UT), and network theory (NT).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Not only we have presented origins and main arguments of these theories but also we have, to some extend, evaluated the strengths and weaknesses of them.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Since the departure of the field of International Business (IB) from international economics orientation various theoretical perspectives of IB was built by taking into account other business related disciplines. In this article, we have concentrated on main theories of FDI and MNCs, namely, market imperfection and oligopolistic reaction theories, product cycle theory (PCT), internalization theory (IT), eclectic (OLI) theory, incremental (Uppsala) theory (UT), and network theory (NT). Not only we have presented origins and main arguments of these theories but also we have, to some extend, evaluated the strengths and weaknesses of them.

Özet

Uluslararası İşletmecilik alanının Uluslararası İktisat disiplininden ayrılmasından bu yana işletmecilikle ilgili diğer disiplinlerden de yararlanılarak Uluslararası İşletmecilik ile ilgili çeşitli teorik perspektifler geliştirilmiştir. Bu makalede incelenen Çokuluslu Şirketler ve Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımlarla ilgili teoriler şunlardır: Piyasa Eksikliği (Yetersizliği) ve Oligopolistik Tepki Teorileri, Ürün Döngüsü (Product Cycle) Teorisi, İçselleştirme (Internalization) Teorisi, Eklemlemeli (Eclectic) Teori, Safhalar (Uppsala) Teorisi, Şebeke (Network) Teorisi. Bu teorilerin kökenleri ve temel argümanları ortaya konulmakla kalmayıp, bir dereceye kadar, Uluslararası İşletmecilik fenomenini açıklamaktaki güçlü ve zayıf oldukları yönlere de değinilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, H. (2022). Çokuluslu Şirketler ve Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırım Teorileri Üzerine Bir İnceleme ve Değerlendirme. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 196–214. https://ajindex.com/articles/490756

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Aharoni, Yair (1999). The Foreign Investment Decision Process (in Abridged Form). In Peter J. Buckley and Pervez N. Ghauri (Ed.), The Internationalization of the Firm: A Reader (pp. 3-13).
  2. Second Edition, London: International Thomson Business Press.
  3. Aliber, R. Z. (1970). A Theory of Foreign Direct Investment. In C. P. Kindleberger (Ed.) The International Corporation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  4. American Heritage Dictionary (1995). New York: Houghton Mifflin. Andersson, Ulf & Johanson, Jan (1997). International Business Enterprise. In Ingmar Björkman and Mats Forsgren (Ed.) The Nature of International Firm: Nordic Contributions to International Business Research. Bain, Joe S. (1956). Barriers to New Competition. Cambridge: MA. Harvard University Press.
  5. Barkema, Harry G., Bell, John H. & Pennings, Johannes M. (1996).
  6. Foreign Entry, Cultural Barriers, and Learning. Strategic Management Journal. Vol. 17, 151- 166. Boddewyn, Jean J. (1985). Theories of Foreign Direct Investment and Divestment: A Classificatory Note. Management International Review, vol. 25, 57-65.
  7. Bodur, Muzaffer, and Madsen, T. K. (1993). Danish Foreign Direct Investments in Turkey. European Business Review. 93 (5), pp. 28-43.
  8. Brook, M. Z. & Remmers, H. L. (1977). International Management and Business Policy. Boston: Houghton Miffin Company. Brouthers, Keith D. (2002).
  9. Institutional, Cultural and Transaction Cost Influences on Entry Mode Choice and Performance. Journal of International Business Studies.Second Quarter, 33 (2), 203-221.
  10. Buckley, Peter J. (1988). The Limits of Explanation: Testing the Internalization Theory of the Multinational Enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies.Summer, 181-194.
  11. Buckley, Peter J. (1997). Trends in International Business Research: The Next 25 Years, In Iyanatul Islam and William Shepherd (Ed.), Current Issues in International Business. London: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. Buckley, Peter J., & Casson, Mark (1976). The Future of Multinational Enterprises.London: McMillian. Buckley, Peter J., & Casson, Mark (1998). Analyzing Foreign Entry Strategies:Extending the Internalization Approach. Journal of International Business Studies. 29 (3), 539-562.
  12. Buckley, Peter J., & Casson, Mark (2003). The Future of the Multinational Enterprise in Retrospect and in Prospect. Journal of International Business Studies. 34 (2),219-222.
  13. Calvet, A. L. (1981). A Synthesis of Foreign Direct Investment Theories and Theories of the Multinational Firm. Journal of Inter