SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

Yerel halkın turizme karşı tutumu: kuşadası ilçesinde karşılaştırmalı bir uygulama

A comparative study of local residents' attitudes towards Tourism in Kuşadası

Uğur ÇALIŞKAN
Özgür ÖZER
Pages
117–133
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results ofboth studies suggest that local residents and the ir social and environmentalneeds should be considered as much important as economic issues.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Tourism is a multifaceted phenomenon affecting physical and social environment.The main purpose of this study is to examine the local resid ents reactionstowards tourism in Kuşadası, Turkey , by a comparative study with the thoughtsgleaned in 2003 in order to determine the changes over the years .
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data obtainedfrom the 384 questionnaire form s has been analyzed with SPSS program and theresul ts were compared with those of the previous one.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results ofboth studies suggest that local residents and the ir social and environmentalneeds should be considered as much important as economic issues.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Tourism is a multifaceted phenomenon affecting physical and social environment.The main purpose of this study is to examine the local resid ents reactionstowards tourism in Kuşadası, Turkey , by a comparative study with the thoughtsgleaned in 2003 in order to determine the changes over the years . Data obtainedfrom the 384 questionnaire form s has been analyzed with SPSS program and theresul ts were compared with those of the previous one. Importance of the studycomes from this comparative approach. The results point out that level ofhappiness and independent variables ha ve significant correlation. Theoretical andpractical implications of the findings are also discussed in the paper. Results ofboth studies suggest that local residents and the ir social and environmentalneeds should be considered as much important as economic issues.

Özet

Turizm fiziki ve sosyal çevreyi etkileyen çok yönlü bir olaydır. Bu çalışma ileKuşadası halkının turizme karşı tepkilerinin belirlenmesine yönelik elde ed ilengüncel verilerin analiz edilerek 2003 yılı sonrasında değişim olup olmadığınınbelirlenmesi hedeflenmektedir. Yapılan 384 anket formundan elde edilen verilerSPSS programı ile analiz edilmiş ve sonuçlar bir önceki çalışmanın sonuçları ilekarşılaştırı lmıştır. Çalışmanın önemi bu karşılaştırmalı yaklaşımdan gelmektedir.Sonuçlar, mutluluk düzeyi ile bağımsız değişkenler arasında önemli bir ilişkiolduğunu göstermektedir. Bulguların teorik ve uygulamaya yönelik etkileri deçalışmada incelenmiş ve turizm planlamasında yerel halk ile sosyal ve çevreselihtiyaçlara ekonomik konular kadar önem verilmesi gerektiği ortaya konmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇALIŞKAN, U., ÖZER, Ö. (2022). Yerel halkın turizme karşı tutumu: kuşadası ilçesinde karşılaştırmalı bir uygulama. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 117–133. https://ajindex.com/articles/490693

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Akış, S. (1996).
  2. Economic, Social and Environme ntal Effect of Tourism Anatolia. Turizm Arastirmalari Dergisi, 7(3–4), 10- 15. Ambroz, M. (2008). Attitudes of Local Residents towards t he Development of Tourism In Slovenia: The Case of The Primorska, Dolenjska, Gorenjska and Ljubljana Regions. Anthropological Notebooks, 14(1), 63- 79. Ap, J. (1990). Residents’ Perceptions Research on the Social Impacts of Tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 17(4), 610- 616. Beeton, S. (2006). Community Development through Tourism. Collingwood, Victoria, Australia: Landlinks Press.
  3. Bramwell, B. (2003). Maltese Responses to Tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 30(3), 581 - 605. Brunt, P. and Courtney, P. (1999). Host Perceptions of Socio –Cultural Impacts. Annals of Tourism Research, 26(3), 493- 515. Carmichael, B.A. (2000). A Matrix Model for Resident Attitudes and Behaviors In A Rapidly Changing Tourist Area. Tourism Management, 21(6), 601 - 611. Choi, H.C. and Murray, I. (2010). Resident Attitudes toward Sustainable Community. Tourism Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 18(4), 575- 594. Crompton, R. and Sanderson, K. (1990). Gendered Jobs and Social Change. London: Unwin Hyman. Çalışkan, U. (2003). Tourism’s Effects on Local People and Kuşadası Pattern. Unpublished Master Thesis, Social Sciences Institute Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir.
  4. Deery, M., Jago, L. and Fredline, L. (2012). Rethinking Social Impacts of Tourism Research: A N ew Research Agend a. Tourism Management, 33, 64- 73. Demirkaya, H. and Çetin, T. (2010). Residents’ Perceptions on the Social and Cultural Impacts of Tou rism in Alanya (Antalya –Turkey). Ekev Akademi Dergisi, 14(42), 383 -391. Diedrich, A. and Garcia–Buades, E. (2008). Local Perceptions of Tourism as Indicators of Destination Decline. Tourism Management, 41, 623- 632. Doğan, H.Z. (2004). Turizmin Sosyo –Kültürel Temelleri. Ankara:
  5. Detay Yayıncılık. Dyer, P., Gursoy, D., Sharma, B. and Carter, J. (2006). Structural Modeling of Resident Perception of Tourism and Associated Development on the Sunshine Coast, Australia. Tour ism Management, 28, 409- 422. Faulkner, B. and Tideswell, C. (1997). A Framework for Monitoring Community Impacts of Tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 5(1), 3- 28. Frauman, E. and Banks, S. (2011). Gateway Community Resident Perceptions of Tourism Development: Incorporating Importance– Performance Analysis into the Limits of Change Framework. Tourism Management, 13(1), 128- 140. Garrod, F. and Fyall, A. (1998). Bey