SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

THE EFFECT ON PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT TIME OF PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT TEAM STRUCTURE: A FIELD RESEARCH IN AUTOMOTIVE SUB-INDUSTRY

ÜRÜN GELİŞTİRME EKİP YAPISININ ÜRÜN GELİŞTİRME PERFORMANSI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ: OTOMOTİV YAN SANAYİİNDE BİR SAHA ARAŞTIRMASI

Aytaç YILDIZ
A Yeşim YAYLA
Pages
47–74
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to obtained the results from the study, the components of the structure of the product development team; crossfunctional teams, co-location of team members, empowered team and team stability have affected product development performance positively and significantly

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, a questionnaire study is carried out to show the effects of the product development team structure on the product development performance in the firms operating in the automotive sub-industry.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The questionnaire, which is prepared to obtain research data, is applied to 51 medium and large scale companies operating in Istanbul and Gebze.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to obtained the results from the study, the components of the structure of the product development team; crossfunctional teams, co-location of team members, empowered team and team stability have affected product development performance positively and significantly
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, a questionnaire study is carried out to show the effects of the product development team structure on the product development performance in the firms operating in the automotive sub-industry. The questionnaire, which is prepared to obtain research data, is applied to 51 medium and large scale companies operating in Istanbul and Gebze. The obtained data from the questionnaire were evaluated by factor, reliability, correlation and regression analysis in SPSS statistical program. According to obtained the results from the study, the components of the structure of the product development team; crossfunctional teams, co-location of team members, empowered team and team stability have affected product development performance positively and significantly

Özet

Bu çalışmada, otomotiv yan sanayiinde faaliyet gösteren firmalarda, ürün geliştirme ekip yapısının ürün geliştirme performansı üzerindeki etkilerini ortaya koyabilmek amacıyla bir anket çalışması yapılmıştır. Araştırma verilerinin elde edilmesi amacıyla hazırlanan anket, İstanbul ve Gebze'de faaliyet gösteren orta ve büyük ölçekli 51 firmaya uygulanmıştır. Anketten elde edilen veriler SPSS istatistik programında faktör, güvenilirlik, korelasyon ve regresyon analizi ile değerlendirilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, ürün geliştirme ekibinin yapısının bileşenleri olan; çapraz fonksiyonel ekipler, ekip üyelerinin ortak konumlandırılması, yetkilendirilmiş ekip ve ekip kararlılığının, ürün geliştirme performansını pozitif yönde ve anlamlı bir şekilde etkilediği görülmüştür

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIZ, A., YAYLA, A. Y. (2022). THE EFFECT ON PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT TIME OF PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT TEAM STRUCTURE: A FIELD RESEARCH IN AUTOMOTIVE SUB-INDUSTRY. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 47–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/490684

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Akgun, A.E. ve Lynn, G.S. (2002). Antecedents and Consequences of Team Stability on New Product Development Performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 19, 263-286.
  2. Akgun, A.E., Byrne, J., Keskin, H., Lynn, G.S. ve Imamoglu, S.Z. (2005). Knowledge Networks in New Product Development Projects: A Transactive Memory Perspective. Information & Management, 42, 1105-1120.
  3. Büyüközkan, G., Dereli, T. ve Baykasoğlu, A. (2004). Yeni Nesil Ürün Geliştirme Yönetimi. Yöneylem Araştırması/Endüstri MühendisliğiXXIV Ulusal Kongresi, Gaziantep-Adana, Türkiye, 15-18
  4. Haziran. Calantone, R., Vickery, S. ve Deoge, C. (1995). Business Performance and Strategic New Product Development Activities: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(3), 214–223.
  5. Campbell, A.J. ve Cooper, R.G. (1999). Do Customer Partnerships Improve New Product Success Rates? Industrial Marketing Management, 28, 507-519.
  6. Carbonell, P. ve Rodriguez, A.I. (2006). Designing Teams for Speedy Product Development: The moderating Effect of Technological Complexity. Journal of Business Research, 59(2), 225-232.
  7. Clift, T.B. ve Vandenbosch, M.B. (1999). Project Complexity and Efforts to Reduce Product Development Cycle Time. Journal of Business Research, 45, 187-198.
  8. Cooper, R.G. ve Kleinschmidt, E.J. (1994). Determinants of Timeliness in Product Development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11, 381-396.
  9. Dikmen, I. (2006). Otomotiv Sektörü ve Rekabet Değerlendirme. Otomotiv Distribütörleri Derneği, 1-4.
  10. Dröge, C., Jayaram, J. ve Vickery, S.K. (2000). The Ability to Minimize the Timing of New Product Development and Introduction: An Examination of Antecedent Factors in the North American Automobile Supplier Industry. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17, 24-40.
  11. Dwyer, L.D. ve Mellor, R. (1991). New Product Process Activities and Project Outcomes. R&D Management, 21(2), 31-52.
  12. Filippini, R., Salmaso, L. ve Tessarolo, P. (2004). Product Development Time Performance: Investigating the Effect of Interactions Between Drivers. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21, 199-214.
  13. Gönüllüoğlu, S. (2003). Yeni Ürün Geliştirmede Firmaların Karşılaştıkları Sorunlar ve Bir Uygulama. Doktora Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul, Türkiye, 34-38, 57-64.
  14. Gonzalez, F.J.M. ve Palacios, T.M.B. (2002). The Effect of New Product Development Techniques on New Product Success in Spanish Firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 31, 261-271.
  15. Green, D