Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

INTERNALIZATION OF INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS AND STRATEGIC PRACTICES: A RESEARCH STUDY IN THE TURKISH TEXTILE INDUSTRY

KURUMSAL MANTIKLARIN İÇSELLEŞTİRİLMESİ VE STRATEJİK PRATİKLER: TÜRK TEKSTİL SANAYİİNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Pages
29–64
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Research findings revealed that the hybridization of institutional logic didn’t hybridize to strategic practices, but that selective coupling (Pache and Santos, 2013) mechanism could be used.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to investigate the transformation of the Turkish textile industry through the institutional logic perspective.
📊
Key Findings & Data:On the other hand, this study aims to find out the relationship between internalization of the institutional logic, strategic practices, and organizational performance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Research findings revealed that the hybridization of institutional logic didn’t hybridize to strategic practices, but that selective coupling (Pache and Santos, 2013) mechanism could be used.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the transformation of the Turkish textile industry through the institutional logic perspective. On the other hand, this study aims to find out the relationship between internalization of the institutional logic, strategic practices, and organizational performance. In accordance with these purposes, the ampirical research has been performed through the usage of qualitative research techniques. The analysis of document examinations as well as the interview notes showed that there was no linear relationship between the hybridization of institutional logic and hybridization of strategic practices. Research findings revealed that the hybridization of institutional logic didn’t hybridize to strategic practices, but that selective coupling (Pache and Santos, 2013) mechanism could be used. Research findings indicate that the type of institutional logic to be followed in adopting institutional logic and shaping strategic practices is important in survival.

Özet

Bu çalışma bir yanıyla Türk tekstil sanayiinde yaşanan dönüşüm kurumsal mantıkperspektifinden araştırmayı öte yandan da kurumsal mantıkların içselleştirilmesi, stratejikpratikler ve örgütsel performans arasındaki ilişkiyi ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Buamaç doğrultusunda Türk tesktil sanayiinde nitel araştırma teknikleri kullanılarak görgül birçalışma yapılmıştır. Doküman incelemeleri ve görüşmeler yoluyla toplanan verilerin analizikurumsal mantıkların melezleşmesi ile stratejik pratiklerin melezleşmesi arasında doğrusalbir bağlantı olmadığını göstermiştir. Araştırma bulguları kurumsal mantıklarınmelezleşmesiyle, stratejik pratiklerin melezleşmediğini bunun aksine seçici bağlanma(Pache ve Santos, 2013) mekanizmasının kullanılabildiğini ortaya koymuştur. Araştırmabulguları, kurumsal mantıkların benimsenmesinde ve stratejik pratiklerinbiçimlendirilmesinde uyulacak kurumsal mantık türünün hayatta kalabilmede önemliolduğuna işaret etmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZSEVEN, M. (2022). INTERNALIZATION OF INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS AND STRATEGIC PRACTICES: A RESEARCH STUDY IN THE TURKISH TEXTILE INDUSTRY. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 29–64. https://ajindex.com/articles/490675

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Anand, N. ve Peterson, R. A. (2000). When Market Information Constitutes Fields: Sensemaking of Markets in the Commercial Music Industry. Organization Science, 11(3), 270-284.
  2. Ansoff, H. I. ve Brandenburg, R. G. (1971a). A Language for Organization Design: Part I. Management Science, 17(12), B705-B716. Ansoff, H. I. ve Brandenburg, R. G. (1971b). A Language for Organization Design: Part II. Management Science, 17(12), B717-B731. Baron, J. N. (2004). Employing Identities in Organizational Ecology. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(1), 3-32.
  3. Battilana, J. Besharov, M. ve Mitzinneck, B. (2017). On Hybrids and Hybrid Organizing: A Review and Roadmap for Future Research. R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence ve R. E. Meyer (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Instititutionalism (ss. 133-169). California: SAGE Publication. Battilana, J. ve Dorado, S. (2010). Building Sustainable Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Commercial Microfinance Organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419-1440.
  4. Battilana, J. ve Lee, M. (2014). Advancing Research on Hybrid OrganizingInsights from the Study of Social Enterprises. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397-441.
  5. Canales, R. (2014). Weaving Straw into Gold: Managing Organizational Tensions between Standardization and Flexibility in Microfinance. Organization Science, 25(1), 1-28.
  6. Dışişleri Bakanlığı (2011). 1/95 Sayılı Ortaklık Konseyi Kararı (Gümrük Birliği Kararı). http://www.mfa.gov.tr/1-95-sayili-ortaklik-konseyi-kararigumruk-birligi-karari.tr.mfa (03.11.2017).
  7. Durand, R. Szostak, B. Jourdan, J. ve Thornton, P. H. (2013). Institutional Logics as Strategic Resources. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 39A, 165-203.
  8. Fligstein, N. (1985). The Spread of the Multidivisional Form among Large Firms, 1919-1979. American Sociological Review, 50(3), 377-391.
  9. Greenwood, R. Raynard, M. Kodeih, F. Micelotta, E. R. ve Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317-371.
  10. İstanbul Sanayi Odası (2017). Geçmiş Yıl Verileri. http://www.iso500.org.tr/iso-500-hakkinda/gecmis-yil-verileri/ (20.11.2017).
  11. Jarzabkowski, P. (2003). Strategic Practices: An Activity Theory Perspective on Continuity and Change. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1), 23- 55. Jarzabkowski, P. (2004). Strategy as Practice: Recursiveness, Adaptation, and Practice-in-Use. Organization Studies, 25(4), 529-560.
  12. Jay, J. (2013). Navigating Paradox as a Mechanism of Change