Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

Veri Zarflama Analiziyle Türkiye'deki Bölgesel Kalkınma Ajanslarının Etkinlıgınin Ölçülmesi

Efficiency Measurement of Regional Development Agencies in Turkey by Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)

Pages
47–78
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

At the end of the study, recommendations are given with the help offindings to improve RDAs performances.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, relative efliciencies of Regional Development Agencies (RDA) work inTurkey were determined using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The goal of DEA is tomeasure relative efliciencies of comparable Decision Making Units which produce similarinput and output.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:At the end of the study, recommendations are given with the help offindings to improve RDAs performances.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, relative efliciencies of Regional Development Agencies (RDA) work inTurkey were determined using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). The goal of DEA is tomeasure relative efliciencies of comparable Decision Making Units which produce similarinput and output. At the end of the analysis, reference decision making units will bedetermined for inejj'icient decision making units. To do this data are gathered fromefliciency reports of Regional Development Agencies and based on these data, efi'iciencyscores are calculated. At the end of the study, recommendations are given with the help offindings to improve RDAs performances.

Özet

Bu çalışmada Veri Zadlama Analizi (VZA) kullanılarak Türkiye'deki BölgeselKalkınma Ajanslarının (BKA) göreli performansları karşılaştırılmıştır VZA'nın amacı,benzer girdilerle benzer çıktılar üreten karşılaştırılabilir karar birimlerinin görelietkinliklerini ölçmektir. Analiz sonucunda etkin olmayan karar birimleri için referansolacak karar birimleri belirlenmektedir.. Etkinlik skorları BKA tarafindan yayınlananfaaliyet raporları baz alınarak hesaplanmıştır. Çalışmanın sonucunda, elde edilenbulgulardan yola çıkarak BKA 'nın performansının nasıl artırılabileceğine yönelik önerilersunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

TARI, R., PEHLİVANOĞLU, F., ÖZBİLGİN, M. (2022). Veri Zarflama Analiziyle Türkiye'deki Bölgesel Kalkınma Ajanslarının Etkinlıgınin Ölçülmesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 47–78. https://ajindex.com/articles/490510

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. ADLER, N., FRIEDMAN, L., SINUANY-STERN, Z. (2002), "Review of Ranking Methods in the Data Envelopment Analysis Context", European Journal of Operational Research, 140, 249-265.
  2. ANSELL, C. (2000), "The Networked Polity: Regional Development in Western Europe", Governance, 13(3), 303-333.
  3. BACHTLER, J. and YUILL, D. (2001), "Policies and Strategies for Regional Development: A Shift in Paradigm?", Regional and Industrial Policy Research Paper, Number: 46, European Policies Research Centre, UK. BANKER, R. D., CHARNES, A., and COOPER, W. W. (1984), "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Efficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092.
  4. CHARNES, A., COOPER, W.W., RHODES, E. (1978), "Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units," European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.
  5. COOPER, W. W., SEIFORD, L. M., and TONE, K. (2007), Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Uses: With DEA-Solver Software and References, Springer, New York. DDK (2014), Türkiye'nin Kalkınma Ajansları Uygulamasının Değerlendirilmesi, T.C. Cumhurbaşkanlığı Devlet Denetleme Kurulu Araştırma ve İnceleme Raporu, 2014/3. FARRELL, M. J. (1957), "The Measurement of Productive Efficiency", Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120(3), 253-281.
  6. HALKIER, H., DANSON, M., DAMBORG, C. (1998), Regional Development Agencies in Europe, Jessica Kingsley. London. KEATING, M.l (2004), "The Political Economy of Regionalism", (Eds. Michael Keating, John Loughin), The Political Economy of Regionalism, 17-40,
  7. Routledge, UK. MAILLAT, D. (1998), Interactions Between Urban Systems and Localized Productive Systems: An Approach to Endogenous Regional Development in Terms of Innovative Milieu, European Planning Studies, 6(2), 117-129.
  8. MOUNTFORD, D. (2009), Organising for Local Development: The Role of Local Development Agencies, Summary Report, CFE/LEED(2009)18. RAO, H. and BABU, M. D. (1996), "Intra-Regional Disparities In Hyderabad- Karnataka Region: An Analysis", Regional Development: Problems and Policy Measures, (Ed. A. Aziz and S. Krishna), Concept Publishing Company, New Delhi. SADIQ, S. (2011), "The Final Frontier: A SAS Approach to Data Envelopment Analysis", in SAS Global Forum 2011
  9. Operations Research, Paper, 198-2011.
  10. STIMSON, R. J., STOUGH R. R., and ROBERTS B. H. (2006), Regional Economic Development: Analysis and Planning Strategy, Berlin: Springer. TONE, K. (1996), "A Simple Characterization of Returns to Scale in DEA", Journal of the Op