SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Elektronik Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

Publication ethics and related problems

Yayın etiği ve sorunları

İzge GÜNAL
Pages
54–56
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although the law and the acts are insufficient to prevent scientific misconduct, at least exposition of the cases are mandatory.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There seems a considerable increase in cases against publication ethics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The main reason appears as the sponsorship of the industry, especially in biomedical research.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although the law and the acts are insufficient to prevent scientific misconduct, at least exposition of the cases are mandatory.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

There seems a considerable increase in cases against publication ethics. The main reason appears as the sponsorship of the industry, especially in biomedical research. However, all mistakes should not be classified as scientific misconduct and should be differentiated from sloopy research. Although the law and the acts are insufficient to prevent scientific misconduct, at least exposition of the cases are mandatory.

Özet

Son yıllarda yayın etiğine aykırı davranışlarda ciddi bir artış görülmektedir. Bunun temel nedeni özellikle biyomedikal araştırmalarda endüstri yönlendirmesinin artmasıdır. Ancak yapılan her yanlış bilimsel yolsuzluk olmayıp, özensiz araştırmadan ayrılmalıdır. Akademik yolsuzluğu önleme konusunda yasalar yetersiz olmasına karşın, yine de her koşulda mücadele etmek gerekir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNAL, İ. (2022). Publication ethics and related problems. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Elektronik Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 54–56. https://ajindex.com/articles/490462

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Bekelman, J.E., Li, Y., & Gross, C.P. (2003). Scope and impact on financial conflict of interest in biomedical research. J Am Med Assoc. 289 (4), 454-465. Cuenod. M., & Gasser, J.(2003). Research on the mentally incomponent. J Med Ethics, 29 (1), 19-21.
  2. Drenth, P.J.D. (2009). Ethics, a condition of science. In: E. Kansu (Ed) Bilim Etiği Sempozyumu. TÜBA, Ankara.19-31
  3. Günal, İ. (2005). Dünyanın en örgütlü, en uzun soluklu, 26 yayınla en büyük bilimsel sahtekarlığı. Cumhuriyet Bilim Teknik, 958, 18-19.
  4. İlhan M. (2000). Bilimsel sahtekarlık. Cumhuriyet Bilim Teknik 677, 21. Lemmens, T., & Singer, P.A. (1998). Bioethics for clinicians: 17. conflict of interest in research education and patient care. Can Med Asssoc J. 159 (4), 960-965.
  5. Lexchin, J., Bero, L., Djulbegovic, B., & Clark, O. (2003). Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review. Bri Med J. 326 (8), 1176-1170. TÜBA (Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi). (2000). Bilimsel araştırmalarda etik ve sorunları. Ankara: TÜBA.