Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

THE EFFECT OF SUEZ CANAL BLOCKAGE ON SUPPLY CHAINS

SUEZ KANALI BLOKAJININ TEDARİK ZİNCİRLERİNE ETKİSİ

Pages
51–79
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, in the conclusion part of the study, the changes it will bring about in the supply chain approaches are included.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of supply chain risk management is to understand the risks and their impacts, to take preventive actions and to determine plans to be implemented when risk events occur.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The ship named Ever Given, which blocked the canal by accident during transportation in the Suez Canal on March 29, 2021, caused significant adverse effects in the supply chains, but also caused a break in the supply chain.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, in the conclusion part of the study, the changes it will bring about in the supply chain approaches are included.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2021 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Süveyş Krizi · Süveyş Blokajı · Ever Given Kazası

Abstract

The purpose of supply chain risk management is to understand the risks and their impacts, to take preventive actions and to determine plans to be implemented when risk events occur. Even if supply chain risks appear to be a minor risk event that was initially ignored, they can cause billions of dollars in costs and long-term supply chain disruptions at the macro level. The ship named Ever Given, which blocked the canal by accident during transportation in the Suez Canal on March 29, 2021, caused significant adverse effects in the supply chains, but also caused a break in the supply chain. In this study, the occurrence of the event is examined in terms of past marine accidents and supply chain risk management. In addition, alternative scenarios that occurred during the accident were examined, their effects on supply chains were determined, and suggestions were made against such accidents in the future. Furthermore, in the conclusion part of the study, the changes it will bring about in the supply chain approaches are included.

Özet

Tedarik zinciri risk yönetiminin amacı, riskleri ve etkilerini anlamak, riskleri önleyici tedbirler almak ve risk olayları meydana geldiğinde uygulanacak planları belirlemektir. Tedarik zinciri riskleri, başlangıçta göz ardı edilen küçük bir risk olayı gibi görünse bile, makro düzeyde milyarlarca dolarlık maliyetlere ve uzun vadeli tedarik zinciri kesintilerine neden olabilmektedir. 29 Mart 2021'de Süveyş Kanalı'nda taşıma sırasında kanalı kaza sonucu tıkayan Ever Given adlı gemi, tedarik zincirlerinde önemli olumsuz etkilere neden olurken, tedarik zincirinde de kırılmalara neden olmuştur. Bu çalışmada, olayın meydana gelmesi geçmiş deniz kazaları ve tedarik zinciri risk yönetimi açısından incelenmiştir. Ayrıca kaza sırasında oluşan alternatif senaryolar incelenmiş, tedarik zincirlerine etkileri belirlenmiş ve ileride ortaya çıkacak bu tür kazalara karşı önerilerde bulunulmuştur. Ayrıca çalışmanın sonuç bölümünde tedarik zinciri yaklaşımlarında getireceği değişikliklere yer verilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKANLISOY, Ö., AKKARTAL, E. (2022). THE EFFECT OF SUEZ CANAL BLOCKAGE ON SUPPLY CHAINS. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 51–79. https://ajindex.com/articles/490261

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Abdel-Basset, M. and Mohamed, R. (2020). A novel plithogenic TOPSIS-CRITIC model for sustainable supply chain risk management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 119586. AlFadhli, M. S., AlAli, M. S. and AlKulaib, H. A. (2021). The Effect of Suez Canal Blockage on Crude Oil Prices: An Event Study Analysis. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM), 23(4), 64-66. Allianz, (2021). The Suez Canal blockage –lessons to be learned. Retrieved from https://www.agcs.allianz.com/news-and-insights/expert-risk-articles/suez-canal-lessons-learned.html Access date 26.04.2021.
  2. Ambulkar, S., Blackhurst, J. and Grawe, S. (2015). Firm’s resilience to supply chain disruptions: Scale development and empirical examination. Journal of Operations Management, 33, 111–122.
  3. Ankel, S. (2021). Ever Given ship forbidden to leave the Suez Canal until its owners pay up to $1 billion in compensation for the chaos it caused. Retrieved from https://www.businessinsider.com/ever-given-forbidden-leave-suez-canal-until-owners-pay-compensation-2021-4 Access date 26.04.2021.
  4. Azevedo-Sa, H., Zhao, H., Esterwood, C., Yang, X. J., Tilbury, D. M. and Robert Jr, L. P. (2021). How internal and external risks affect the relationships between trust and driver behavior in automated driving systems. Transportation research part C: emerging technologies, 123, 102973, 1-17.
  5. Boston, W. and Nassauer, S. (2021). Companies Consider Alternative Routes, Assess Costs as Suez Canal Blockage Continues. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/articles/companies-consider-alternative-routes-assess-costs-as-suez-canal-blockage-continues-11616693465 Access date 02.05.2021. CIPS, (2021). Suez Canal blockage 'could have $40bn supply chain impact'. Retrieved from https://www.cips.org/supply-management/news/2021/march/suez-canal-blockage-could-have-40bn-supply-chain-impact/ Access date 30.04.2021.
  6. Craighead, C. W., Blackhurst, J., Rungtusanatham, M. J. and Handfield, R. B. (2007). The severity of supply chain disruptions: design characteristics and mitigation capabilities. Decision sciences, 38(1), 131-156. Cogoport, (2021). Shipping Challenges Persist In 2021: From Covid-19 To Suez Canal Blockage. Retrieved from https://www.cogoport.com/blogs/shipping-challenges-persist-in-2021-from-covid-19-to-suez-canal-blockage Access date 03.05.2021.
  7. Coleman, L. (2012). Explaining crude oil prices using fundamental measures. Energy Policy, 40, 318-324.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.10.012
  8. Daultani, Y., Kumar, S., Vaidya, O. S