SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dini Araştırmalar / 2015 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 46

Absract A Begoted Salafi or A Concerned Intellectual? (A Review On Ibn Taymiyyah s Critical and Reactionary Character)

Faruk SANCAR
Pages
97–125
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus we will have the opportunity to recognize the heritage of this great name who was demonized by some and sanctified by others.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article aims to reveal the reactionary character of Ibn Taymiyyah, one of the most important theorists of Islamic thought, which can be considered as a reflection of his scientific personality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As every thought should be considered in its age, a pho- tograph of sociocultural conditions of his period that influence the formation of this character will be taken and causes and extent of his reactivity will be shown.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus we will have the opportunity to recognize the heritage of this great name who was demonized by some and sanctified by others.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article aims to reveal the reactionary character of Ibn Taymiyyah, one of the most important theorists of Islamic thought, which can be considered as a reflection of his scientific personality. As every thought should be considered in its age, a pho- tograph of sociocultural conditions of his period that influence the formation of this character will be taken and causes and extent of his reactivity will be shown. Critical perspective manifested itself since the beginning of the tadwin century reached its peak with Ibn Taymiyyah. In particular, his philosophy, theology and İslamic mysti- cism criticism enabled us to inherit a rich accumulation in this regard. The unfortunate thing was that his alleged followers made a dogmatic figure out of one of the greatest critics of Islamic thought blaming his critical thinking. In this review, we will try to uncover Ibn Taymiyyah s critics of religious conceptions of his age from an objective academic perspective. Thus we will have the opportunity to recognize the heritage of this great name who was demonized by some and sanctified by others.

🔖

Cite This Article

SANCAR, F. (2022). Absract A Begoted Salafi or A Concerned Intellectual? (A Review On Ibn Taymiyyah s Critical and Reactionary Character). Dini Araştırmalar, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 46, 97–125. https://ajindex.com/articles/489461

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Abrahamov, Bünyamin (2009). “Akıl-Nakil Uyumu Noktasında İbn Teymiyye’nin Yaklaşımı”. çvr. Salih Özer, İslamî İlimler Dergisi, sy. 1-2.
  2. Alberry, A. J. (1957).
  3. Revelation and Reason in Islam, London: Allen-Unwin, s. 7-9.
  4. Ben Cheneb, Moh. Ben, “İbn Teymiyye”, İA. Brockelmann, Carl (1937-1942). Geschichte der Arabischen Litteratur Supple- mentband, Leiden. Cürcânî, Seyyid Şerif (1995). Kitâbü’t-tarifât, Beyrut: Daru’l-Kütübi’l-İlmiyye. Cüveynî, İmâmü’l-Harameyn (2002/1422). Kitâbü’l-irşad ilâ kavâtıi’l-edille fî usûli’l-itikâd, thk. Muhammed Yusuf Musa, Abdülmünim Abdülhamid, Kahire: Mektebetü’l-Hancî. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Davudoğlu, Ahmed (1978).
  5. Din Tahripçileri, İstanbul.
  6. Ebu Zehra, Muhammed (1988). İmam İbn Teymiyye, trc. Nusreddin Bolelli, v.dğr, İstanbul: İslamoğlu Yayıncılık. Gazâlî, Ebu Hâmid Muhammed b. Muhammed (2006). Kânunü’t-tevîl (Mecmûatü Resâili’l-İmâmi’l-Gazâlî içinde), Beyrut: Daru’l-Kütibi’l-İlmiyye. ______, Ebu Hâmid Muhammed. El-Mustasfa min ilmi’l-usûl, nşr. İbrahim Muhammed Ramazan, Beyrut:Daru’l-Erkam, ts. ______ (1964). Fedâihu’l-Bâtıniyye, nşr. Abdurrrahman Bedevî, Kahire 1964.
  7. Hodgson, Marshall G. S. (1995). İslam’ın Serüveni, İstanbul: İz Yayıncılık. İbn Battûta (1985). Rihletü İbn Batûta: Tühfetü’n-nüzzâr fî ğarâibi’l-emsâr ve acâibi’l-esfâr, nşr. Ali el-Muntasır el-Kettânî, Beyrut: Müessesetü’r-Risâle. İbn Kayyim, el-Cevziyye (1403/1983). Esmâü müellefâti Şeyhi’l-islâm İbn Tey- miyye, nşr. Selahaddin el-Müneccid, Beyrut. İbn Kesîr, İsmail b. Ömer, el-Bidâye ve’n-nihâye, thk. Ali Şîrî, Daru İhyâi Türâsi’l-Arabî, 1988/1408. İbn Recep, Ebu’l-Ferec Zeynüddin Abdurrahman, Zeyl alâ Tabakâti’l-Hanâbile, Beyrut: Dâru’l-Marife, ts. İbn Teymiyye, Ebu’l-Abbâs Takıyyüddin Ahmed b. Abdülhalîm (2009). Der’ü teâruzi’l-akl ve’n-nakl, nşr. Abdüllatîf Abdurrahmân, Beyrut: Dâru’l-Kütübi’l- İlmiyye. ______ (1409/1989). Minhâcü’s-sünneti’n-nebeviyye fî nakdi kelâmi’ş-Şîa ve’l- Kaderiyye, nşr. Muhammed Reşâd Sâlim, Kahire: Mektebetü İbn Teymiyye, II. ______ (1420/1994). el-Furkân beyne evliyâi’r-Rahmân ve evliyâi’ş-şeytân, nşr. Abdurrahman b. Abdülkerim el-Yahya, Riyad-Beyrut: Daru’l-Fazile, Daru İbn Hazm. ______ (1993). er-Redd ala’l-mantîkıyyîn, thk. Refîk el-Acem, Beyrut: Dâru’l- Fikri’l-Lübnânî. ______, Mecmûatü’r-resâili’l-mesail, Mısır, ts. ______, Mecmûu Fetâvâ Şeyhi’l-İslam Ahmed b. Teymiyye, nşr. Abdurrahman b. Muhammed b. Kâsım, Riyad, ts. ______, Nakdu’l-mantık, thk. Muhammed Hâmid el-Fîkî,, Kahire: Mektebetü’s- Sünneti’l-M