SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3

Religiosity and Cognitive Processes

DİNDARLIK ve BİLİŞSEL SÜREÇLER

Michal STRÍZENEC
Pages
273–286
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We shall confine ourselves briefly to outline the relationship between science and religion, or between modern psychology and religion.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:An essential role in rationality is played by man's cognitive processes, particularly his intellect.
📊
Key Findings & Data:But these processes simultaneously are the basis of one of the numerous dimensions of religious belief--of a cognitive, or declarative dimension.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We shall confine ourselves briefly to outline the relationship between science and religion, or between modern psychology and religion.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

An essential role in rationality is played by man's cognitive processes, particularly his intellect. But these processes simultaneously are the basis of one of the numerous dimensions of religious belief--of a cognitive, or declarative dimension. The study has for aim to underline some of the more recent psychological notions from this domain, without dealing in any detail with the complex philosophical or theological aspects of the issue. We shall confine ourselves briefly to outline the relationship between science and religion, or between modern psychology and religion.

Özet

Kişinin bilişsel süreçleri, özellikle aklı, rasyonellikte temel bir rol oynamaktadır. Fakat bu süreçler eş zamanlı olarak dini inancın birçok boyutlarından- bilişsel veya bildirim boyutunun- temelidir. Bu çalışma, konunun kompleks felsefi veya teolojik yönleriyle ilgilenmeksizin, bu alanla ilgili daha çok son zamanlardaki psikolojik fikirlerden bazılarının altını çizme amacını taşımaktadır. Kendimizi bilim ve din ya da modern psikoloji ve din arasındaki ilişkiyi kısaca özetlemeyle sınırlandıracağız.

🔖

Cite This Article

STRÍZENEC, M. (2022). Religiosity and Cognitive Processes. Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3, 273–286. https://ajindex.com/articles/489352

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Altemeyer B. and B. Hunsberger, "Authoritarianism, Religious Fundamentalism, Quest and Prejudice", Int. J. for the Psychology of Religion, 2 (1992): 113-133.
  2. Barbour D. G., Religion in an Age of Science. New York: Harper and Row, 1990. Benner D. G. (ed.). Baker Encyclopedia of Psychology. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1990. Hefner P., "The Science-Religion Relation. Controversy, Convergence and Search for Meaning", Int. J. for the Psychology of Religion, 7 (1997): 143-158.
  3. Hunsberger B., M. Pratt and S. M., Pancer, "Religious Fundamentalism and Religious Doubts: Content, Connections and Complexity of Thinking", Int. J. for the Psychology of Religion, 6 (1996): 201-220. Keckes R., and C. Wolf, "Christliche Religiosität: Konzepte, Indikatoren, Messinstrumente", Kölner Ztschr. f. Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 45 (1993): 270-287. Kondás O., Kordacová, J. Iracionalita a jej hodnotenie [Irrationality and Its Assessment]. Bratislava: Stimul, 2000.
  4. Kuczkowski S., Psychologia religii, Kraków: WAM, 1993.
  5. Leahy M., R. S. Laura, "Religions, 'Doctrines' and the Closure of Minds", J. of Philosophy of Education, 31 (1997): 329-343.
  6. Mihina F., Rationality. K nácrtu genealógie, modelov a problémov. [Rationality. On Sketches of Genealogy, Models and Problems]. Presov: Manalon, 1997. Nielsen M. E., "An Assessment of Religious Conflicts and their Resolutions", J. for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37 (1998): 181-190. Oser F. K., and K. H. Reich, "Psychological Perspectives on Religious Development", World Psychology, 2 (1996): 365-396. Pancer S. M. et al., "Religious Orthodoxy and the Complexity of Thought about Religious and Nonreligious Issues", J. of Personality, 63 (1995): 214-232.
  7. Pope John Paul II, Encyklika--Fides et Ratio [Faith and Reason]. Bratislava: Vydav. Don Bosco, 1998. Rokeach M. (ed.). The Open and Closed Mind. NewYork: Basic Books, 1960.
  8. Ross C. F. J., D. Weiss and L. Jackson, "The Relation of Jungian Psychological Type to Religious Attitudes and Practice", Int. J. for the Psychology of Religion. 6 (1996): 263-279.
  9. Ruisel I., Inteligencia a osobnost [Intelligence and Personality]. Bratislava: Veda, 1999. Sarmány Schuller I., M. Strízenec, "Fundamentalizmus a potreba struktúry", [Fundamentalism and the Need for Structure] In: M. Bratská, E. Nanistová, I. Sarmány Schuller(eds.). Reflexie súcasnej psychológie na Slovensku [Reflexions of Contemporary Psychology in Slovakia]. Bratislava: Stimul, 1999, pp. 170-175. Shafranske E. P. (ed.). Religion and the