SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dil Eğitimi ve Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

An Examination of the Psychology of the Feedback Receiver: The Case of EFL Students

Geribildirim Alanların Psikolojisinin İncelenmesi: Yabancı Dil Olarak İngilizce Öğrenen Kişiler Örneği

Hasan SAĞLAMEL
Mustafa Zeki ÇIRAKLI
Pages
678–692
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study offers some insights into our understanding of the impact of the feedback practices and helps us identify which aspects of feedback practices prove to be “self-regulating” or “traumatic.” Several suggestions for developing efficient strategies to be employed in feedback provision are made in the light of the findings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The shift to a constructive feedback culture requires a thorough examination of the impact of feedback practices.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In an effort to address this gap, this study attempts to elicit the perspectives of 8 EFL learners who are taking writing classes in a preparatory programme.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study offers some insights into our understanding of the impact of the feedback practices and helps us identify which aspects of feedback practices prove to be “self-regulating” or “traumatic.” Several suggestions for developing efficient strategies to be employed in feedback provision are made in the light of the findings.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:geridönüt · yazma · yabancı dil

Abstract

The shift to a constructive feedback culture requires a thorough examination of the impact of feedback practices. However, a great many studies conducted on feedback in EFL or ESL contexts focus mainly on the effectiveness of feedback practices with reference to feedback receivers’ achievement or improvement in subsequent writing practices. Thus, the psychological aspects of the feedback provision processes are not adequately investigated. In an effort to address this gap, this study attempts to elicit the perspectives of 8 EFL learners who are taking writing classes in a preparatory programme. Stimulated-recall protocols conducted for three drafts and semi-structured interviews were used to gather data, and Kohut’s terminologies with reference to his self-psychology were used in the interpretation of the data. The study offers some insights into our understanding of the impact of the feedback practices and helps us identify which aspects of feedback practices prove to be “self-regulating” or “traumatic.” Several suggestions for developing efficient strategies to be employed in feedback provision are made in the light of the findings.

Özet

Yapıcı bir geribildirim kültürüne geçiş, geribildirim uygulamalarının etkisinin kapsamlı bir şekilde ele alınmasını gerektirir. Ancak İkinci veya Yabancı Dil Olarak İngilizce bağlamlarında geri bildirim üzerine yapılan çok sayıda çalışma çoğunlukla geri bildirim alan kişilerin geribildirimden sonraki yazma uygulamalarındaki başarılarına veya gelişmelerine yönelik olup bu geri bildirim uygulamalarının verimliliğine odaklanmaktadır. Dolayısıyla, geri bildirim süreçlerinin psikolojik yönleri yeterince araştırılmamıştır. Bu boşluğu gidermek amacıyla yapılan bu çalışma, Yabancı Dil Olarak İngilizce bağlamında bir hazırlık programında yazma dersleri alan 8 öğrencinin geri bildirime olan bakış açılarını ortaya çıkarmaya çalışmaktadır. Veri toplamak için üç taslak üzerinde uygulanan çağrışım tekniği protokolleri ve yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler kullanılmıştır ve verilerin yorumlanmasında Kohut'un kendilik psikolojisi ile ilgili terminolojilerden yararlanılmıştır. Çalışma, geri bildirim uygulamalarının etkisine ilişkin bazı görüşler sunmaktadır ve geri bildirim uygulamalarının hangi yönlerinin “öz-düzenleyici” ya da “travmatik” olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Çalışma, geri bildirim uygulamalarına psikolojik bir perspektif sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAĞLAMEL, H., ÇIRAKLI, M. Z. (2022). An Examination of the Psychology of the Feedback Receiver: The Case of EFL Students. Dil Eğitimi ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 678–692. https://ajindex.com/articles/488689

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Journal, 78, 465–83.
  2. Bacal, H. A. (1985). 16 Optimal responsiveness and the therapeutic process. Progress in Self Psychology, 1, 202–227.
  3. Banai, E., Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2005). “Selfobject” needs in Kohut's self psychology: Links with attachment, self-cohesion, affect regulation, and adjustment. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 22(2), 224-260.
  4. Brophy, J. (1981). Teacher praise: A functional analysis. Review of Educational Research, 51(1), 5-32.
  5. Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267-296.
  6. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc. Çıraklı, M. Z. (2018). Theory of postromantic education in the postmodernist era: Maxims. Journal of Narrative and Language Studies, 6(11), 133-136.
  7. Ferris, D. R. (1995). Student reactions to teacher response in multiple‐draft composition classrooms. TESOL quarterly, 29(1), 33-53.
  8. Hanjani, A. M., & Li, L. (2014). Exploring L2 writers' collaborative revision interactions and their writing performance. System, 44, 101-114.
  9. Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
  10. Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students' writing. Language. Teaching, 39, 83–101.
  11. Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of the self. New York: International University Press.
  12. Kohut, H. (1977). The restoration of the self. New York: International University Press.
  13. Kohut, H. (1982). Introspection, empathy, and the semi-circle of mental health. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 63, 395-407.
  14. Kohut, H. (1984). How does analysis cure? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  15. Marmarosh, C. L., & Mann, S. (2014). Patients’ selfobject needs in psychodynamic psychotherapy: How they relate to client attachment, symptoms, and the therapy alliance. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 31(3), 297-313
  16. McDonough, J., & McDonough, S. (2014). Research methods for English language teachers. Routledge. McLean, J. (2007). Psychotherapy with a narcissistic patient using Kohut's self psychology model. Psychiatry (Edgmont), 4(10), 40-47.
  17. Ornstein, P. H., & Ornstein, A. (1996). I. Some general principles of