Journals / Mellifera / 2016 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1

An In vitro Study on Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activity of Propolis from Rize Province of Turkey

Türkiye’de Rize İlinden Elde Edilen Propolisin Antimikrobiyal ve Antioksidan Aktivitesi Üzerine İn Vitro Çalışma

Journal
Mellifera
Pages
4–18
Publication Date
2016-11-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, according to the results shown by GC-MS, at least one substance was dissolved in EAEP and also by us, was found to have the highest antioxidant effect in the EAEP and AEP and the highest antimicrobial effect in the AEP

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study antibacterial, antifungal and antioxidant activities of propolis samples from the Rize province of Turkey in different solvents were investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of fifteen microorganisms belonging to Gram-positive (Bacillus cereus, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus subtilis, Listeria monocytogenes, Micrococcus luteus, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus salivarius), Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus vulgaris, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella enteritidis) and a fungi (Candida albicans) were studied using a disc-diffusion and minimal inhibition concentration (MIC) methods.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, according to the results shown by GC-MS, at least one substance was dissolved in EAEP and also by us, was found to have the highest antioxidant effect in the EAEP and AEP and the highest antimicrobial effect in the AEP
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Antimikrobiyal aktivite · antioksidan aktivite · propolis

Abstract

In this study antibacterial, antifungal and antioxidant activities of propolis samples from the Rize province of Turkey in different solvents were investigated. A total of fifteen microorganisms belonging to Gram-positive (Bacillus cereus, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus subtilis, Listeria monocytogenes, Micrococcus luteus, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus salivarius), Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus vulgaris, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella enteritidis) and a fungi (Candida albicans) were studied using a disc-diffusion and minimal inhibition concentration (MIC) methods. Ethanol extracts of propolis (EEP), acetone extracts of propolis (AEP), ethyl acetate extracts of propolis (EAEP) and methanol extracts of propolis (MEP) showed the highest antimicrobial activity against S. mutans, L. monocytogenes, M. luteus, B. licheniformis and C. albicans. While dimethyl sulfoxide extracts of propolis (DMSOEP) has the weakly activity against some test organism. The most sensitive microorganisms to propolis were E. coli, B. licheniformis, S. mutans, L. monocytogenes and B. cereus in the test microorganisms. Finally, according to the results shown by GC-MS, at least one substance was dissolved in EAEP and also by us, was found to have the highest antioxidant effect in the EAEP and AEP and the highest antimicrobial effect in the AEP

Özet

Bu çalışmada Türkiye’nin Rize ilinden toplanan propolis örneklerinin farklı solventlerde antibakteriyal antifungal ve antioksidan aktiviteleri araştırılmıştır.Gram pozitif bakteriler (Bacillus cereus, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus subtilis, Listeria monocytogenes, Micrococcus luteus, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus salivarius), Gram negatif bakteriler (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus vulgaris, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella enteritidis) ve bir maya (Candida albicans) olmak üzere toplamda 15 mikroorganizma disk difüzyon ve minimum inhibisyon konsantrasyonu (MİK) yöntemi kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Propolisin etanol ekstraktı (EPE), propolisin aseton ekstraktı (APE), propolisin etil asetat ekstraktı (EAPE) ve propolisin metanol ekstraktı (MPE) S. mutans, L. monocytogenesis, M. luteus, B. licheniformis ve C. albicans’a karşı en yüksek antimikrobiyal aktivite göstermiştir. Dimetil sülfoksit Propolis Ekstraktı (DMSOPE) bazı test mikroorganizmalarına karşı zayıf aktivite göstermiştir. Propolise en duyarlı mikroorganizmalar E. coli, B. licheniformis, S. mutans, L. monocytogenes ve B. cereus olmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERTÜRK, Ö., ÇİL, E., YOLOĞLU, N., YAVUZ, C. (2016). An In vitro Study on Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activity of Propolis from Rize Province of Turkey. Mellifera, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1, 4–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/48840

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. GHISALBERTI, E L (1979) Propolis: a review. Bee World, 60: 59-84
  2. BURDOCK, G A (1998) Review of the biological properties and toxicity of propolis. Food Chem Toxicol, 36:341-363
  3. BANKOVA, V (2005). Chemical diversity of propolis and problem of standardization. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 100: 114–117
  4. MATSUNO, T (1997) O efeito terapêutico da propolis. New York: Columbia University, Institute of Cancer Research
  5. SALATINO, A; TEIXEIRA, É W; NEGRI, G; MESSAGE, D (2005) Origin and Chemical Variation of Brazilian Propolis. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2(1): 33-38
  6. CASTALDO, S; CAPASSO, F (2000) Propolis, an old remedy used in modern medicine. Fitoterapia, 73(1): 1-6[7] ADELMANN, J; PASSOS, M; BREYER, D H, ROCHA DOS SANTOS, M H; LENZ, C; LEITE, N F;LANÇAS, F M; FONTANA, J D (2007) Exotic flora dependence of an unusual Brazilian propolis: The pinocembrin biomarker by capillary techniques. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 43: 174-178
  7. BANKOVA, V; POPOVA, M; BOGDANOV, S; SABATINI, A G (2002) Chemical composition of European propolis: expected and unexpected results. Z Naturforsch, 57: 530-533
  8. MONTENEGRO, G; TIMMERMANN, B N; PENA, R C; MUJICA, A M; AVILA, G (2000) Pollen grains and vegetative structures in propolis as indicators of potential drugs in Chilean plants. Phyton 66: 15–23
  9. PARK, Y K; PAREDES, G J F; AGUIAR, C L; ALENCAR, S M; FUJIWARA, F Y (2004) Chemical constituents in Baccharis dracunculifolia as the main botanical origin of southeastern Brazilian propolis. The Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 52(5): 1100–1103
  10. RONALD, M A (1990) Microbiologia, Compania Editorial Continental S.A. de C.V., Mexico, 1 D. F
  11. VANDEN, B D A VLIETINCK, A J (1991) Screening methods for antibacterial and antiviral agents from higger plants. In: DEy, P.M., Harborne, J.B. (Eds.) Methods in Plant Biochemistry.London
  12. POPOVA, M; SILICI, S; KAFTANOĞLU, O; BANKOVA, V (2005) Antibacterial activity of Turkish propolis and Its Qualitative and Quantitative Chemical Composition. Phytomedicine, 12: 221-228
  13. KÜÇÜK, M; KOLAYLI, S; KARAOĞLU, Ş; ULUSOY, E; BALTACI, C; CANDAN, F (2007) Biological activities and chemical composition of three honeys of different types from Anatolia. Food Chemistry, 100: 526-534
  14. BENZIE, I F F; STRAIN, J J (1999) Methods in Enzymology Orlando. FL: Academic, 299: 15 27
  15. MARSH, P D (1994) Microbial ecology of dental plaque and its significance