SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dicle Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Mühendislik Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 5

Research on electrical strain gages and experimental stress analysis: Case study for a full wheatstone bridge

Gürkan İrsel
Pages
783–792
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that the measurement with the strain gauge differed 1.20% and 1.40% from the analytical and numerical results, respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigated electrical strain gage technology, which is widely used in experimental stress measurement, on an application.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This method is carried out to verify the numerical and analytical calculations performed or to record the strain data generated during the active duty of a system and to investigate the fatigue damage.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that the measurement with the strain gauge differed 1.20% and 1.40% from the analytical and numerical results, respectively.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Strain gages · Wheatstone bridge circuit · Experimental stress analysis

Abstract

This study investigated electrical strain gage technology, which is widely used in experimental stress measurement, on an application. Strain gages are used to precisely measure strain directly in a system. This method is carried out to verify the numerical and analytical calculations performed or to record the strain data generated during the active duty of a system and to investigate the fatigue damage. In particular, verifying numerical calculations in the strength-material recovery optimizations of mass-produced systems contributes to the development of the system. In this study, strain measurement using strain gage and strain measurement technology is presented on an application. Information was given about strain gages. A full bridge wheatstone bridge consisting of 4 linear gages was created on a prototype. The system was tested with a load cell validation. Structural finite element analysis of the prototype and analytical calculation of the fullbridge strain gage connection were performed. The results showed that the measurement with the strain gauge differed 1.20% and 1.40% from the analytical and numerical results, respectively. Thus, precision strain measurement technology was successfully presented in engineering systems.

🔖

Cite This Article

İrsel, G. (2022). Research on electrical strain gages and experimental stress analysis: Case study for a full wheatstone bridge. Dicle Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Mühendislik Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 5, 783–792. https://ajindex.com/articles/487517

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. K. Hoffmann, “An Introduction to Measurements using Strain Gages,” Hottinger Baldwin Messtechnik GmbH, p. 257, 1989
  2. G. İrsel, “Strength-based design of a fertilizer spreader chassis using computer aided engineering and experimental validation,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 2021, doi: 10.1177/0954406221993847
  3. H. K. Çelik, N. Çaglayan, M. Topakci, A. E. W. Rennie, and I. Akinci, “Strength-based design analysis of a Para-Plow tillage tool,” Comput. Electron. Agric., vol. 169, no. December 2019, p. 105168, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2019.105168
  4. T. J. Lisle, B. A. Shaw, and R. C. Frazer, “Internal spur gear root bending stress: A comparison of ISO 6336:1996, ISO 6336:2006, VDI 2737:2005, AGMA, ANSYS finite element analysis and strain gauge techniques,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci., vol. 233, no. 5, pp. 1713–1720, 2019, doi: 10.1177/0954406218774364
  5. G. İrsel, “Effects of modification on the strength–weight ratio of standard bevel gears,” Mech. Based Des. Struct. Mach., 2021, doi: 10.1080/15397734.2021.1960562
  6. H. Moustabchir, Z. Azari, S. Hariri, and I. Dmytrakh, “Experimental and numerical study of stress-strain state of pressurised cylindrical shells with external defects,” Eng. Fail. Anal., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 506–514, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2009.09.011
  7. H. Yurdem, A. Degirmencioglu, E. Cakir, and E. Gulsoylu, “Measurement of strains induced on a three-bottom moldboard plough under load and comparisons with finite element simulations,” Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed., vol. 136, pp. 594–602, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.01.011
  8. H. K. Celik, A. E. W. Rennie, and I. Akinci, “Design and structural optimisation of a tractor mounted telescopic boom crane,” J. Brazilian Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 909–924, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s40430-016-0558-y
  9. H. Ma, J. Wang, G. Li, and J. Qiu, “Fatigue redesign of failed sub frame using stress measuring, FEA and British Standard 7608,” Eng. Fail. Anal., vol. 97, no. January, pp. 103–114, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.01.032
  10. S. S. Patil, S. Karuppanan, I. Atanasovska, and A. A. Wahab, “Contact stress analysis of helical gear pairs, including frictional coefficients,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., vol. 85, pp. 205–211, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.05.013
  11. B. Gao, X. Chen, and G. Chen, “Ratchetting and ratchetting boundary study of pressurized straight low carbon steel pipe under reversed bending,” Int. J. Pres