Journals / Damar Cerrahi Dergisi / 2001 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Management of military vascular injuries

Ateşli silahlarla oluşan damar yaralanmalarında cerrahi yaklaşım

Pages
23–27
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

At the military vascular injuries, the surgeon must be quick, experienced, equipped and determined..

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:From January 1995 to December 1999,63 patients with vascular injuries caused by high-velocity military missiles were admitted to our hospital in a period of 15 minutes to 10 hours (mean 2,3 hours).
📊
Key Findings & Data:There were 58 (76,3%) arterial and 18 (23,7%) venous injuries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:At the military vascular injuries, the surgeon must be quick, experienced, equipped and determined..
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

From January 1995 to December 1999,63 patients with vascular injuries caused by high-velocity military missiles were admitted to our hospital in a period of 15 minutes to 10 hours (mean 2,3 hours). There were 58 (76,3%) arterial and 18 (23,7%) venous injuries. Vascular injuries concomitant with 28 (36,9%) bone fracture, 6 (7,9%) nerve injuries, 9(11,8%) hemopneumothorax and 1 (1,3%) abdominal injuries. The treatment of the injured arteries were 39 (51,3%) saphenous vein interposition grafting, 13 (17,1%) end to end anastomosis, 12 (15,7%) primary suture, 7 (9,2%) synthetic graft replacement and 5 (6,6%) ligation. Three patients (3,9%) died because of hipovolemic shock. Five patients undervent amputation (6,6%) and fasciotomy was performed after vascular repair in 11 cases 14,5%). At the military vascular injuries, the surgeon must be quick, experienced, equipped and determined..

Özet

Ocak 1995-Aralık 1999 tarihleri arasında acil servisimize ateşli silah yaralanması nedeniyle kabul edilen 63 olgu ortalama 2,3 saat (15dak-10saat) içinde başvurmuştur. Damar yaralanmalarının 58 (%76,3) tanesi arteriel, 18 (%23,7) tanesi venöz yaralanmadır. Bu yaralanmalara 28 (%36,9) kemik kırığı, 6 (%7,9) sinir hasarı, 9 (%11,8) hemopönomotoraks, 1 (%1,3) batın travması eşlik etmektedir. Cerrahi tedavi olarak safen interpozisyonu 39 olguda (%51,3), ucuca anastomoz 13 olguda (%17,1), primer onarım 12 olguda (%15,7), sentetik damar grefti 7 olguda (%9,2) ve ligasyon 5 olguda (%6,6) uygulanmıştır. 3 olgu (%3,9) hipovolemik şok nedeniyle eksitus olmuştur. 5 olguya (%6,6) amputasyon, 11 olguya (%14,5) fasiyotomi uygulanmıştır. Ateşli silahlarla oluşan damar yaralanmalarında hızlı, deneyimli, donanımlı ve kararlı olmamız gerekir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZIŞIK, K., KÖSE, S., PEKER, R. O., KERİMOĞLU, B., ERTÜRK, M. (2022). Management of military vascular injuries. Damar Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 23–27. https://ajindex.com/articles/486887

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Peacock JB, Proctor HJ: Factors limiting extremity function following vascular injury. J Trauma 17:532, 1977. 2.Menzoian JO, Doyle JE, Cantelmo NL, et al: A comprehensive approach to extremitiy vascular trauma. Arch Surg 120:801-804, 1985. 3.Böke E: Periferik damar yaralanmaları. Kalp ve damar yaralanmaları, Editör: Bozer AY. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yayınları, 26: 146, 1986. 4.Rich NM, Baugh JH, Hughes CW: Acute arterial in­ jury in Vietnam: 1000 cases. J Trauma 10:359, 1970. 5.Ryan JM, Cooper GJ, Haywood İR, et al: Field surgery on a future conventional battlefield: Stra­tegy and wound management. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 73:13, 1991. 6.Fitridge RD, Roptis S, Miller JH, et al: Upper ext­remity arterial injuries: Experience at the Royal Adelaide Hospital 1969 to 1991. J Vasc Surg 20: 941-946, 1994. 7.Sherif AA: Vascular injuries: experience during the Afghanistan War. Int Surg 77(2): 114-117, 1992. 8.Luetic V, Sosa T, Tonkovic I, et al: Military vascu­lar injuries in Croatia. Cardiovasc Surg 1:1-6, 1993 9.Mattox KL, Hirshberg A: Vascular trauma: Haimovici H (ed) Vascular Surgery: Principles and tech­niques. 4th edition, Cambridge, Blackwell Scien­ce, pp:480-496, 1996. 10.Radonic V, Baric D, Giunio L, et al: War injuries of the femoral artery and vein: a report on 67 ca­ses. Cardivasc Surg 5(6):641-647, 1997. 11.Lovric Z: Reconstruction of major arteries of ext­remities after war injuries. J Cardiovasc Surg (To­rino) 34(0:33-37, 1993. 12.Daugherty ME, Sachatello CR, Ernst CB: Impro­ved treatment of popliteal arterial injuries (Usinganticoagulation and extra-anatomic reconstructi­on). Arch Surg 113:1317-1321, 1978. 13.Lovric Z, Wertheimer B, Candrlic K, et al: War in­ juries of major extremity vessels. J Trauma 36(2):248-251, 1994. 14.Radonic V, Baric D, Petricevic A, et al: War inju­ries of the crural arteries. Br J Surg 82(6):777-783,1995. 15.Davidovic L, Lotina S, Kostic D, et al: Popliteal ar­tery war injuries. Cardiovasc Surg 5(0:37-41, 1997. 16.Sirinek KR, Levine BA, Gaskill HV, et al: Reassesment of the role of routine operative exploration inthe vascular trauma. J Trauma 21(5)339-344, 1981. 17.Dajani OM, Haddad FF, Hajj HA, et al: Injury to the femoral vessels: the Lebanese War experien­ce. Eur J Vasc Surg 2(5):293-296, 1988.