Journals / Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences / 2014 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 4

CBCT images of anatomic landmarks in maxillofacial region

Maksillofasiyal bölgedeki anatomik noktaların CBCT görüntüleri

Pages
232–240
Publication Date
2015-05-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this review we mentioned some anatomic structures of the maxillofacial region by using CBCT imaging.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Conventional radiographic techniques in dental radiology allows only 2D images of 3D structures of head and neck region.
📊
Key Findings & Data:CBCT has remarkable advantages such as shorter exposure time, reduced image distortion due to patient movements, decreased patient dose and multiplanar screening.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this review we mentioned some anatomic structures of the maxillofacial region by using CBCT imaging.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anatomik noktalar · CBCT · maksillofasiyal bölge

Abstract

Conventional radiographic techniques in dental radiology allows only 2D images of 3D structures of head and neck region. CBCT is a recent technology, is also named as dental volumetric tomography, which was developed as an alternative to conventional CT using cone beam-shaped X-ray to provide more rapid acquisition of a data set of entire maxillofacial region. CBCT has remarkable advantages such as shorter exposure time, reduced image distortion due to patient movements, decreased patient dose and multiplanar screening. CBCT also allows the clinicians to localize the anatomic structures of the maxillofacial region and these anatomic structures can be visualized in various planes such as axial, coronal and sagittal planes. In this review we mentioned some anatomic structures of the maxillofacial region by using CBCT imaging.

Özet

Diş hekimliği radyolojisinde konvansiyonel çekim teknikleri baş ve boyun bölgesinde üç boyutlu kompleks yapıların sadece iki boyutlu görüntülenmesine olanak verir. CBCT, diğer bir ismiyle dental volumetrik tomografi, maksillofasiyal bölgede daha hızlı veri elde edebilmek amacıyla konvansiyonel bilgisayarlı tomografiye (BT) alternatif olarak geliştirilmiştir. CBCT’nin avantajları arasında daha kısa ışınlama süresi, hasta hareketine bağlı olarak oluşan distorsiyonda azalma, multiplanar görüntüleme olanağı ve hastanın maruz kaldığı dozda azalma bulunmaktadır. CBCT klinisyenlerin maksillofasiyal bölgede yer alan anatomik noktaların lokalizasyonun belirlenmesinde ve anatomik yapıların aksiyal, koronal, sagittal düzlemlerde görüntülenmesine olanak sağlar. Bu derlemede maksillofasiyal bölgede yer alan bazı anatomik noktaların CBCT görüntülerinden bahsetmekteyiz.

🔖

Cite This Article

MAYİL, M., KESER, G., PEKİNER, F. N. (2015). CBCT images of anatomic landmarks in maxillofacial region. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 4, 232–240. https://ajindex.com/articles/481783

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Robb R. Dynamic spatial reconstructor: an x-ray video fluoroscopic CT scanner for dynamic volume imaging of moving organs. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1982;1:22-23.
  2. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol. 1998;8:1558-1564.
  3. Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am. 2008;52:707-730.
  4. Miracle AC, Mukherji SK. Conebeam CT of the Head and Neck, Part 1: Physical Principles AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:1088-1095.
  5. MacDonald-Jankowski DS, Orpe EC. Some current legal issues that may affect oral and maxillofacial radiology. Part 2: digital monitors and cone-beam computed tomography. J Can Dent Assoc. 2007;73:507-511. Valentin J. The 2007 recommendation of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37:1-332.
  6. Carter L, Farman AG, Geist J, Scarfe WC, Angelopoulos C, Nair MK, Hildebolt CF, Tyndall D, Shrout M. American Academy of Oral Maxillofacial Radiology executive opinion statement on performing and interpreting diagnostic cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;106:561-562.
  7. Razavi T, Palmer RD, Davies J, Wilson R, Palmer PJ. Accuracy of measuring the cortical bone thickness adjacent to dental implants using cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;23:718-725.
  8. Adibi S, Zhang W, Servos T, O’Neill PN. Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Dentistry: What Dental Educators and Learners Should Know. J Dent Educ. 2009;76:1437-1442.
  9. Serhal CB, Jacobs R, Flygare L, Quirynen M, Van Steenberghe D. Perioperative validation of localisation of the mental foramen. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2002;31:39-43.
  10. Yang J, Cavalcanti MGP, Ruprecht A, Vannier MW. 2-D and 3-D reconstructions of spiral computed tomography in localization of the inferior alveolar canal for dental implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999;87:369-374.
  11. Nakagawa Y, Kobayashi K, Ishii H, Mishima A, Ishii H, Asada K, Ishibashi K. Preoperative application of limited cone beam computerized tomography as an assessment tool before minor oral surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;31:322-326.
  12. Ito K, Gomi Y, Sato S, Arai Y, Shinoda K. Clinical application of a new compact CT system to assess 3-D images for the preoperative treatment planning of implants in the posterior mandible A case report. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:539-