SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3

RETROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF INCISIVE CANAL MORPHOLOGY IN MANDIBLE IN DENTATE, EDENTULOUS AND PARTIALLY DENTATE PATIENTS USING CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

KONİK IŞINLI BİLGİSAYARLI TOMOGRAFİ İLE DİŞLİ, DİŞSİZ VE PARSİYEL DİŞLİ BİREYLERDE MANDİBULAR İNSİZİV KANALIN MORFOLOJİSİNİN RETROSPEKTİF OLARAK DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Meltem MAYİL
Semih ÖZBAYRAK
Filiz Namdar PEKİNER
Pages
337–348
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The canal diameter on middle and end points were significantly higher in dentate than edentulous on both sides and in partially dentate group on left side (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The purpose of this study is to evaluate mandibular incisive canal morphology in dentate, edentulous and partially dentate inviduals using cone beam computed tomography( CBCT), retrospectivelty.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: The study group consisted of images of 60 females and 60 males who was over 30 years old, divided in three goups: dentate, edentulous and partially dentate.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The canal diameter on middle and end points were significantly higher in dentate than edentulous on both sides and in partially dentate group on left side (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study is to evaluate mandibular incisive canal morphology in dentate, edentulous and partially dentate inviduals using cone beam computed tomography( CBCT), retrospectivelty. Materials and Methods: The study group consisted of images of 60 females and 60 males who was over 30 years old, divided in three goups: dentate, edentulous and partially dentate. In cross sectional images the canal diameter, distances from canal to buccal-lingual cortex, alveolar crest and basis mandible were measured on starting, middle, end point of canal. The length of canal, being unilateral or bilateral, the bone width between end points and the location within the alveolar bone were evaluated. The relationship between genders and datas were compared. Results: Mandibular incisive canal incidance was 94,2% in all cases. No statistically significant difference in incidence and length of canal were found between the groups (p˃0,05). The canal diameter on middle and end points were significantly higher in dentate than edentulous on both sides and in partially dentate group on left side (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi (KIBT) ile dişli, dişsiz ve parsiyel dişli bireylerde mandibular insiziv(MİK) kanal morfolojisinin restrospektif olarak değerlendirilmesidir.Gereç ve yöntem: Çalışma grubunu 30 yaş üzeri total dişli, dişsiz ve parsiyel dişli hastalara ait 60 kadın, 60 erkek bireyingörüntüleri oluşturmaktadır. Elde edilen çapraz kesitlerde sağ ve sol kanalın başlangıç, orta, sonlanma noktalarının çap genişliğiile kanalın alveol kemiği içindeki konumu değerlendirilmiştir. Kanalın uzunluğu, unilateral veya bilateral oluşu, alveol kemikiçerisindeki konumu değerlendirilmiş, bilateral kanalların birleşmediği olgularda sonlanma noktaları arasındaki alveolar kemikbantı mesafesi ölçülerek cinsiyet ile ilişkisi karşılaştırılmıştır.Bulgular: Olguların tümünde %94,2 oranında kanal gözlenmiştir. Kanalın görülme sıklığı ve uzunluğunda gruplar arasındaistatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark saptanmamıştır (p˃0,05). Dişli olgularda MİK orta ve sonlanma noktalarının çap genişliğinin sağtarafta dişsiz olgulardan, sol tarafta dişsiz ve parsiyel dişli olgulardan istatistiksel olarak anlamlı şekilde fazla olduğu saptanmıştır(p

🔖

Cite This Article

MAYİL, M., ÖZBAYRAK, S., PEKİNER, F. N. (2022). RETROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF INCISIVE CANAL MORPHOLOGY IN MANDIBLE IN DENTATE, EDENTULOUS AND PARTIALLY DENTATE PATIENTS USING CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3, 337–348. https://ajindex.com/articles/451583

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Bavitz JB, Harn SD, Hansen CA, Lang M. An anatomical study of mental neurovascular bundle– implant relationship. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993; 8: 563-7
  2. Parnia F, Moslehifard E, Hafezeqoran A, Mahboub F, Mojaver-Kahnamou H.Characteristics of anatomical landmarks in the mandibular interforaminal region: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012;17: 420-25
  3. Olivier E. The inferior dental canal and its nerve in the adult. Br Dent J 1928; 49: 356–68
  4. Wadu SG, PEnhall B, Townsend GC. Morphological variability of the human inferior alveolar nerve. Clin Anatomy 1997; 10: 82-7
  5. De Andrade E, Pucher J, Ranganath KA, St George N. The ıntraosseous course of the mandibular incisive nerve in the mandibular sympysis. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2001; 21: 591-7
  6. Mraiwa N, Jacobs R, Moerman P, Lambrichts I, Steenberghe VD, Quirynen M. Presence and course of the incisive canal in the human mandibular interforaminal region: two-dimensional imaging versus anatomical observations. Surg Radiol Anat 2003;25:416-23
  7. Mardinger O, Chaushu G, Arensburg B, Taicher S, Kaffe I. Anatomic and radiologic course of the mandibular incisive canal. Surg Radiol Anat 2000; 22: 157–61
  8. Juodzbalys G, Wang HL. Guidelines for the identification of the mandibular vital structures: practical clinical applications of anatomy and radiological examination methods. J Oral Maxillofac Res 2010;1:2-15
  9. Garg AK, Morales MJ, Navarro I, Duar te F. Autogenous mandibular bone grafts in the treatment of the resorbed maxillary anterior alveolar ridge: rationale and approach. Implant Dent 1998;7: 169-76
  10. Hunt DR, Jovanovic SA. Autogenous bone harvesting: a chin graft technique for particulate and monocortical bone blocks. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1999;19: 165–73
  11. Walton JN. Altered sensation associated with implants in the anterior mandible: a prospective study. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83: 443–49
  12. Von Arx T, Häfliger J, Chappuis V. Neurosensory disturbances following bone harvesting in the symphysis: a prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 32–9
  13. Silva FM, Cor tez AL, Moreira RW, Mazzonetto R. Complications of intraoral donor sites for bone grafting prior to implant placement. Implant Dent. 2006;15: 420-6
  14. Miller RJ, Edwards WC, Boudet C, Cohen JH. Maxillofacial anatomy: the mandibular symphysis in. J Oral Implant 2011;36: 745-53
  15. Kajan ZD, Salari A. Presence and course of the mandibular