Journals / Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

In Vitro Activity of Fosfomycin on Biofilm in Community-Acquired Staphylococcus Aureus Isolates

Pages
202–209
Publication Date
2019-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, to increase fosfomycin’s efficiency, there is a need for more combination studies to make it more effective.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Staphylococcus aureus is a significant pathogen microorganism that can lead to serious infections.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: S. aureus was isolated from 87 samples (13.2%) out of a total 658 nasal samples.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, to increase fosfomycin’s efficiency, there is a need for more combination studies to make it more effective.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:87 samples
⚙️Variables:Staphylococcus aureus · biofilm · fosfomycin

Abstract

Objective: Staphylococcus aureus is a significant pathogen microorganism that can lead to serious infections. In this study, we researched the activity of biofilm formation and fosfomycin on biofilm in community-acquired S. aureus isolates that were drawn from human noses. Methods: Microtitration plate method was used to determine biofilm formation. The effect of fosfomycin on sessile cells was studied on biofilm matrix composed around plastic beads. The icaA, icaD, icaB, icaC, bap, eno, fnbA, fnbB, clfA, clfB, fib, ebpS, cna and mecA genes were screened by Polymerase Chain Reactions (PCR). Results: S. aureus was isolated from 87 samples (13.2%) out of a total 658 nasal samples. We found that 10 of these isolates (11.4%) were methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). A total of 86 isolates had the ability to form biofilm. The biofilm inhibitor concentration (BIC) and minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) of fosfomycin were determined as 8 µg/ml and 32 µg/ml, respectively. In the molecular detection results of biofilm-related genes of these isolates, ica-dependent genes were determined to be quite high. However, no bap gene was observed to be positive in any of the isolates. Among the other genes, the most frequent genes to be declared positive were eno (97.6%) and fnbA (94.1%). Conclusion: This study indicates that prevalence of biofilm genes in S. aureus isolates in nasal flora is high and fosfomycin is an effective anti-biofilm agent alone. However, to increase fosfomycin’s efficiency, there is a need for more combination studies to make it more effective.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEZGİN, F. M., AVCU, M., SEVİM, E., BABAOGLU, U. T. (2019). In Vitro Activity of Fosfomycin on Biofilm in Community-Acquired Staphylococcus Aureus Isolates. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 202–209. https://ajindex.com/articles/481613

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Nair S, Desai S, Poonacha N, Vipra A, Sharma U. Antibiofilm Activity and Synergistic Inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms by Bactericidal Protein P128 in Combination with Antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2016; 60: 7280-7289
  2. Tang HJ, Chen CC, Cheng KC, Toh HS, Su BA, Chiang SR, Ko WC, Chuang YC. In vitro efficacy of fosfomycin-containing regimens against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in biofilms. J Antimicrob Chemother 2012; 67: 944-950
  3. Gualtieri M, Bastide L, Villain-Guillot P, Michaux-Charachon S, Latouche J, Leonetti JP. In vitro activity of a new antibacterial rhodanine derivative against Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006; 58: 778-783. 4. ten Broeke-Smits NJP, Kummer JA, Bleys RLAW, Fluit AC, Boel CHE. Hair follicles as a niche of Staphylococcus aureus in the nose; is a more effective decolonisation strategy needed? J Hosp Infect 2010; 76: 211-214
  4. Von Eiff C, Becker K, Machka K, Stammer H, Peters G. Nasal carriage as a source of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 11-16
  5. Hershow RC, Khayr WF, Smith NLA. Comparison of clinical virulance of nosocomially acquired methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus infections in a university hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992; 13: 587-593
  6. Appelbaum PC. Microbiology of antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 45: 165-170
  7. Maor Y, Rahav G, Belausov N, Ben-David D, Smollan G, Keller N. Prevalence and haracteristics of heteroresistant vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in a tertiary care center. J Clin Microbiol 2007; 45: 1511-1514
  8. Smith K, Perez A, Ramage G, Gemmell CG, Lang S. Comparison of biofilm-associated cell survival following in vitro exposure of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilms to the antibiotics clindamycin, daptomycin, linezolid, tigecycline and vancomycin. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2009; 33: 374-378
  9. Høiby N, Bjarnsholt T, Givskov M, Molin S, Ciofu O. Antibiotic resistance of bacterial biofilms. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2010; 35: 322-332
  10. Schlegelová J, Babák V, Holasová M, Dendis M. The biofilm-positive Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates in raw materials, foodstuffs and on contact surfaces in processing plants. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 2008; 53: 500-504
  11. Nostro A, Cellini L, Ginestra G, D'Arrigo M, Giulio M, Marino A, Blanco AR, Favaloro A, Bisignano G. Staphylococcal biofilm format