Furthermore, the effects of the magnetic field on the infrared transitions between the hydrogenic states in a parabolic quantum well under are investigated.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the binding energy of the donor impurity at 1s, 2s and 2p± states in a parabolic quantum well is calculated variationally within the effective mass approximation as a function of the quantum well width and the external magnetic field.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, the binding energy of the donor impurity at 1s, 2s and 2p± states in a parabolic quantum well is calculated variationally within the effective mass approximation as a function of the quantum well width and the external magnetic field.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, the effects of the magnetic field on the infrared transitions between the hydrogenic states in a parabolic quantum well under are investigated.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
In this study, the binding energy of the donor impurity at 1s, 2s and 2p± states in a parabolic quantum well is calculated variationally within the effective mass approximation as a function of the quantum well width and the external magnetic field. Furthermore, the effects of the magnetic field on the infrared transitions between the hydrogenic states in a parabolic quantum well under are investigated.
Özet
Bu çalışmada, tek parabolik kuantum kuyusunda 1s, 2s ve 2p± düzeylerindeki donor safsızlık atomunun bağlanma enerjisi, etkin kütle yaklaşımında varyasyonel olarak, kuyu genişliği ve dışarıdan uygulanan manyetik alanın bir fonksiyonu olarak hesaplamıştır. Ayrıca, GaAs/Ga1-xAlxAs tek parabolik kuantum kuyusunda hidrojenik düzeyler arasındaki kızılötesi geçişler üzerinde manyetik alanın etkisi incelenmiştir.
🔖
Cite This Article
YEŞİLGÜL, Ü., KASAPOĞLU, E., ÇOBAN, C. (2022). Effect of Magnetic Field on Hydrogenic Energy Levels in Parabolic Quantum Well. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2, 99–108. https://ajindex.com/articles/480429
R.L. Greene, K.K. Bajaj, D.E. Phelps Phys. Rev. B, 29 (1984), p. 1807. [2]N.E. Kaputkina, Yu.E. Lozovik Physica E, 12 (2002), p. 323. [3]C.L. Beltran Rios, N. Porras-Montenegro Phys. Rev. B, 68 (2003), p. 155316. [4]T. Yoshioka, K. Asamo Phys. Rev. B, 86 (2012), p. 115314. [5]M.Dvorak, S.H. Wei, Z. Wu Phys. Rev. Lett., 110 (2013), p. 016402. [6]Q. Fanyao, A. L. A. Fonseca, O. A. C. Nunes, J. Appl. Phys. 82 (1997) 1236. [7]E. Kasapoglu, F. Ungan, H. Sari, I. Sokmen, M.E. Mora-Ramos, C.A. Duque, Seperlatt. Microstruc. 73 (2014) 171. [8]E. C. Niculescu, L. M. Burileanu, A. Radu, Seperlatt. Microstruc. 44 (2008) 173. [9]Radu, E. C. Niculescu, M. Cristea, J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. 10 (2008) 2555. [10]L. M. Burileanu, E. C. Niculescu, N. Eseanu, A. Radu, Physica E 41 (2009) 856. [11]G. Bastard, Phys. Rev. B 24, 4714 (1981). [12]C. Mailhot, Y.C. Chang, and T.C. McGill, Phys. Rev. B 26, 4449 (1982). [13]G. Bastard, J. Lum. 30, 488 (1985). [14]F.I. Betancur, I.D. Mikhailov, Phys. Rev. B 51, 4982 (1995). [15]E. Kasapoglu, F. Ungan, H. Sari, I. Sokmen,Phys. E 42, 1623(2010). [16]P. Villamila, C. Cabraa, N. Porras-Montenegro,Microelectronics J. 36,383 (2005). [17]G.V.B. de Souza, A.Bruno-Alfonso,Phys. E 66, 128(2015). [18]H. Yıldırım, B. Aslan,Phys. Status Solidi B 249, 2207 (2012). [19]B. Li, A. P. Djotyan, Y. L. Hao, A. A. Avetisyan, F. M. Peeters,Phys. Rev. B 87, 075313 (2013). [20]Abramov,World Journal of Condensed Matter Physics 2, 188,(2012).[21]J. Cen and K. K. Bajaj, Phys. Rev. B 48, 8061 (1993).