Journals / Cumhuriyet Dental Journal / 2012 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4

Assesment of normal color vision and color vision-deficient dentists success ratio on color evaluation

Renk körü ve renk körü olmayan diş hekimlerinin renk seçimindeki başarı oranlarının değerlendirilmesi

Pages
320–326
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: Color vision-deficient dentistswere less succesfull than normal color visiondentists in color matching.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of this study was toassesment of normal color vision and color vision- deficient dentists success ratio on color evaluation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Dentists who haveminimum 3 years clinical experience and between26-63 years old (n=90) were included for this study.Ishihara color blindness test was applied in alldentists before the test applying.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: Color vision-deficient dentistswere less succesfull than normal color visiondentists in color matching.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was toassesment of normal color vision and color vision- deficient dentists success ratio on color evaluation. Materials and Methods: Dentists who haveminimum 3 years clinical experience and between26-63 years old (n=90) were included for this study.Ishihara color blindness test was applied in alldentists before the test applying. Two pieces fromeach color totally 32 (13 mm x 2.4 mm) porcelainspecimens were fabricated. There were 32 tabswere to be matched; the dentists were asked to mark the correct colorcode Results: Success rate of matching colors ofcolor blind dentists was 33.92% ratio. The ratio incolor vision dentists was 60.09%. Normal colorvision dentists showed highest degree in matchingat A3.5, B3, C4, D2 colors. Color vision-deficientdentists were unsuccessful in matching A1, B1, C1,B2, D2, A3 colors. Conclusions: Color vision-deficient dentistswere less succesfull than normal color visiondentists in color matching.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, renk körü ve renkkörü olmayan diş hekimlerinin renk seçimindekibaşarı oranlarının değerlendirilmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: En az 3 sene klinikdeneyimi olan, yaşları 26 ile 63 arasındaki dişhekimleri (n=90) çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. Testuygulaması yapılmadan önce tüm bireylere İshihararenk körlüğü testi uygulanmıştır. Ivoclar Klasikrenk skalası referans alınarak, her bir renkten 2 şeradet olmak üzere toplam 32 adet disk (13 mm x 2,4mm) hazırlandı. Aynı renkte olan porselenörneklerin eşleştirilmesi istendi. Bulgular: Renk körü olan hekimler renklerieşleştirmede başarı oranı 33,92 % dir. Renk körüolmayan diş hekimlerinde ise bu oran 60,09% dur.Renk körü olmayan diş hekimleri renkeşleştirmesinde sırasıyla A3.5, B3, C4, D2renklerinde yüksek oranda başarı sağlamışlardır.Renk körü olan hekimler ise A1, B1, C1, B2, D2,A3 renklerinin eşleştirmesinde başarılıolamamışlardır. Sonuç: Renk körü olan hekimler renkseçiminde, renk körü olmayan hekimlere göre dahabaşarısız olmuşlardır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TUNÇDEMİR, M. T., TUNÇDEMİR, A. R., ÖZTÜRK, C., POLAT, S. (2022). Assesment of normal color vision and color vision-deficient dentists success ratio on color evaluation. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4, 320–326. https://ajindex.com/articles/477238

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Chu SJ. Color. In: Gurel G, ed. The science and art of porcelain laminate veneers. Istanbul: Quintessence, 2003:159-162
  2. Geary JL, Kinirons MJ. Colour perception of laboratory-fired samples of body coloured ceramic. J Dent 1999;27:145-148
  3. Amit V Naik, Ranjana C Pai. Color blindness in dental students and staff- an obstacle in shade selection for restorations. Annals Essences Dent 2010;2(3):25-28
  4. Sim CPC, Yap AUJ, Teo J. Color perception among different dental personnel. Oper Dent 2001;26:435- 439
  5. Lee YK, Yoon TH, Lim BS, Kim CW, Powers JM. Effects of colour measuring mode and light source on the color of shade guides. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29:1099-1107
  6. Davis LG, Ashworth PD, Spriggs LS. Psychological effects of aesthetic dental treatment. J Dent 1998;26:547-554
  7. Cal E, Sonugelen M, Guneri P, Kesercioglu A, Kose T. Application of a digital technique in evaluating the reliability of shade guides. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:483-491
  8. Okubo SR, Kanawati A, Richards MW, Childress S. Evaluation of visual and instrument shade matching. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:642-648
  9. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J, Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics 4th ed. 2006:709-726
  10. Van der Burgt TP, ten Bosch JJ, Borsboom PC, Kortsmit WJ. A comparison of new and conventional methods for quantification of tooth color. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:155- 162
  11. Sproull RC. Color matching in dentistry. Part II: practical applications for the organization of color. 1973. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:458-464
  12. Sorensen JA, Torres TJ. Shade determination and communication: A team approach. In: Perspectives in dental ceramics Ed.: Jack D. Preston, Chicago: Quintessence, 1988:279- 284 13. Fondriest J. Shade matching in restorative dentistry: the science and strategies. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003;23:467-479
  13. Paravina RD, Powers JM. Esthetic color training in dentistry. St. Louis: Elsevier Mosby,2004:26,139,142
  14. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 4th Ed. St. Louis: Mosby,2006:709- 726
  15. O’Brien WJ. Dental materials and their selection. 3rd ed. Carol Stream: Quintessence Publishing Co, 2002:24-33
  16. Joiner A. Tooth colour: a review of the literature. J Dent 2004;32:3-12
  17. Goodkind RJ, Schwabacher WB. Use of a fiberoptic colorimeter for an in vivo color measurement of 2830 anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58:535-542
  18. Schwabacher WB, Goodkind RJ. Threedimensional color coordinates of naturalteeth compare