SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Cumhuriyet Dental Journal / 2016 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

Bone quality and quantity measurement techniques in dentistry

Taner ERSELCAN
Canan ARSLAN
Melike KORALTAN
Hasan YELER
Defne Yalçın YELER
Turgay P HOCAOGLU
Pages
73–86
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finding a method, which can be also applied on jaw bones and will not damage to the patient and offering a correct information that might be contrubute in dentistry especially with respect to implant and periodontal operations.The aim of the present article, is to provide basic information to reader from past to present about main procedures on assessment of bone structure also including jaw bones and the advantages and disadvantages of these methods.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In dentistry, finding a reliable method for measurement mineral density of bone and bone strength in jaw bones is not only beneficial for implant planning, but also benefical in early diagnosis of diseases which effects the mineral density of bone like osteoporosis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:DXA yields quantitative information on bone structure.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finding a method, which can be also applied on jaw bones and will not damage to the patient and offering a correct information that might be contrubute in dentistry especially with respect to implant and periodontal operations.The aim of the present article, is to provide basic information to reader from past to present about main procedures on assessment of bone structure also including jaw bones and the advantages and disadvantages of these methods.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In dentistry, finding a reliable method for measurement mineral density of bone and bone strength in jaw bones is not only beneficial for implant planning, but also benefical in early diagnosis of diseases which effects the mineral density of bone like osteoporosis. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) method is considered as a gold standard for measurement of bone mineral density in medicine. DXA yields quantitative information on bone structure. In addition DXA, imaging methods which given detailed qualitative information have been developed. Finding a method, which can be also applied on jaw bones and will not damage to the patient and offering a correct information that might be contrubute in dentistry especially with respect to implant and periodontal operations.The aim of the present article, is to provide basic information to reader from past to present about main procedures on assessment of bone structure also including jaw bones and the advantages and disadvantages of these methods.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERSELCAN, T., ARSLAN, C., KORALTAN, M., YELER, H., YELER, D. Y., HOCAOGLU, T. P. (2022). Bone quality and quantity measurement techniques in dentistry. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 73–86. https://ajindex.com/articles/477068

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Kanis JA, Borgstrom F, De Laet C, Johansson H, Johnell O, Jonsson B, Oden A, Zethraeus N, Pfleger B, Khaltaev N. Assessment of fracture risk. Osteoporos Int 2005Jun;16(6):581-589
  2. Fanuscu M I, Chang TL. Threedimensional morphometric analysis of human cadaver bone: microstructural data from maxilla and mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:213-218
  3. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In: Branemark P I, Zarb G A, Albrektsson T (eds). Tissue Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence,1985:199-209
  4. Misch C E. Density of bone: effect on treatment planning, surgical approach, and healing. In: Misch CE (ed). Contemporary Implant Dentistry. USA,St. Louis,Mo: Mosby,1993:469-485
  5. Moisio K, Podolskaya G, Barnhart B, Berzins A, Sumner D. pQCT provides better prediction of canine femur breaking load than does DXA. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2003;3:240-245
  6. Hsu JT, Wang SP, Huang HL, Chen YJ, Wu J, Tsai MT. J The assessment of trabecular bone parameters and cortical bone strength: A comparison of micro-CT and dental cone-beam CT. Biomech 2013Oct;46(15):2611-2618
  7. McCreadie BR, Goldstein SA. Biomechanics of fracture: is bone mineral density sufficient to assess risk? J Bone Miner Res 2000;15:2305-2308
  8. Genant HK, Cooper C, Poor G, et al. Interim report and recommendations of the World Health Organization Task-Force for Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 1999;10:259-264
  9. Lindh C, Nilsson M, Klinge B, Petersson A. Quantitative computed tomography of trabecular bone in the mandible. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1996;25:146-150
  10. Ferretti J. Perspectives of pQCT technology associated to biomechanical studies in skeletal research employing rat models. Bone 1995;17:353-364
  11. Ferretti J L, Capozza R F, Zanchetta J R. Mechanical validation of a tomographic (pQCT) index for noninvasive estimation of rat femur bending strength. Bone 1996;18:97-102
  12. Brandenburger GH.Clinical determination of bone quality: is ultrasound an answer? Calcif Tissue Int 1993;53 (Suppl1):151-156
  13. Park YS, Yi KY, Lee I S, Jung YC. Correlation between microtomography and histomorphometry for assessment of implant osseointegration. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16(2):156-160
  14. Vlasiadis ZK, Skouteris AC, Velegrakis AG, Fragouli I, Neratzoulakis MJ, Damilakis J, Koumantakis EE. Mandibular radiomorphometric measurements as indicators of possible osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Maturitas. 2007;58:226-235.