Journals / Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4

Gender Perception of Academicians Using Social Media and the Influencing Factors

Pages
310–315
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It has been determined that being female, specializing in educational sciences and social sciences, and having working mother increased the gender perception; having a mother with secondary school education or less decreased the gender perception.Conclusion: In conclusion, while being an academic positively affects the perception of gender, patriarchal social structure still has an effect on the difference between men and women.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In this study; the gender perception of academicians and the influencing variables related to the individuals and their families are examined.Methods: The study was conducted online on the Facebook groups, which academicians from various universities in Turkey are members of.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Percentages and frequencies were used for the evaluation of the data related to individuals and their families; multi-linear regression analysis was performed for the evaluation of the variables influencing the perception.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It has been determined that being female, specializing in educational sciences and social sciences, and having working mother increased the gender perception; having a mother with secondary school education or less decreased the gender perception.Conclusion: In conclusion, while being an academic positively affects the perception of gender, patriarchal social structure still has an effect on the difference between men and women.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Higher education · Gender · Academician

Abstract

Objective: In this study; the gender perception of academicians and the influencing variables related to the individuals and their families are examined.Methods: The study was conducted online on the Facebook groups, which academicians from various universities in Turkey are members of. The questionnaire prepared by the researcher and the “Perception of Gender Scale” were used. Percentages and frequencies were used for the evaluation of the data related to individuals and their families; multi-linear regression analysis was performed for the evaluation of the variables influencing the perception. A total of 589 academicians were contacted for the study.Results: It has been determined that academics using social media had high gender perception scores. It has been determined that being female, specializing in educational sciences and social sciences, and having working mother increased the gender perception; having a mother with secondary school education or less decreased the gender perception.Conclusion: In conclusion, while being an academic positively affects the perception of gender, patriarchal social structure still has an effect on the difference between men and women. That only woman and variables related to woman have an effect on the perception of gender shows the importance of woman in the formation of the gender perception.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kabukcuoğlu, K., Aydın, R., Demirci, A. D., Korukçu, Ö. (2022). Gender Perception of Academicians Using Social Media and the Influencing Factors. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4, 310–315. https://ajindex.com/articles/474349

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Connell R, Soydemir C. Toplumsal Cinsiyet ve Iktidar: Toplum, Kişi ve Cinsel Politika. İstanbul: Ayrıntı
  2. 1998 2. Özkanlı Ö, White K. Leadership and strategic choices: Female professors in Australia and Turkey. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 2008
  3. 30(1): 53-63. 3. Parashar S, Dhar S, Dhar U. Perception of values: a study of future professionals. Journal of Human Values, 2004
  4. 10(2): 143-152. 4. Althusser L. İdeoloji ve Devletin İdeolojik Aygıtları. Ankara: İthaki yayınları
  5. Emirosmanoğlu Z. Bourdieu in Turkey: Translation space in revival Bourdieu en Turquie: L’espace des traductions en pleine émergence. Journal of Human Sciences, 2016
  6. 13(2): 2710-2734. 6. Connell RW, Messerschmidt JW. Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept. Gender & Society, 2005
  7. 19(6): 829-859. 7. Chronaki A. Disrupting ‘Development’as the Quality/Equity Discourse: Cyborgs and Subalterns in School Technoscience. In Mapping equity and quality in mathematics education. New Jersey: Springer
  8. White MJ, White GB. Implicit and explicit occupational gender stereotypes. Sex Roles, 2006
  9. 55(3-4): 259-266. 9. Clearfield MW, Nelson NM. Sex differences in mothers' speech and play behavior with 6-, 9-, and 14-month-old infants. Sex Roles, 2006
  10. 54(1-2): 127-137. 10. Rust J, Golombok S, Hines M, Johnston K, Golding J, Team AS. The role of brothers and sisters in the gender development of preschool children. J Exp Child Psychol, 2000
  11. 77(4): 292-303. 11. Gönenç İ, Akgün Ş, Özvarış Ş, Bahar T, Emin T. An analysis of the relationship between academic career and sex at Hacettepe University. Egitim ve Bilim, 2013
  12. 38(170): 166-178. 12. Sağlamer G, Tan M, Çağlayan H. Türk Yükseköğretiminde Kadın Katılımı Üzerine Bir Araştırma. İstanbul: Cenkler Matbaacılık
  13. Kahraman L. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi toplumsal cinsiyet algısı araştırması. International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 2014
  14. 9(2): 811-902. 14. Dikmen N, Maden D. Kadın akademisyenlerin görünmeyen emeği üzerine bir araştırma: Ordu Üniversitesi örneği. Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi, 2012
  15. 4(2): 235:250. 15. Akar C. Investigating the students’ perceptions of the democratic values of academicians. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 2016
  16. 7(1): 96-139. 16. Altınova H, Duyan V. Toplumsal cinsiyet algısı ölçeğinin geçerlik güvenirlik çalışması. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, 2013
  17. 24(2): 9-22. 17. Badinter E, Ekmekci A. Kadınlık mı?