Journals / Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

Investigation of Fracture Resistance of Zirconia Restorations After Different Surface Treatments

Pages
320–323
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Within the limitations of the present study, surface treatments and cement have no effect on the flexural strength of zirconia ceramic crowns.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the different surface treatments on fracture strength of the zirconia-based ceramic restorations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Each of 120 dental implant abutments and analogs were used in the present study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Within the limitations of the present study, surface treatments and cement have no effect on the flexural strength of zirconia ceramic crowns.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:dental lasers · fracture strenght test · surface treatments

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the different surface treatments on fracture strength of the zirconia-based ceramic restorations. Methods: Each of 120 dental implant abutments and analogs were used in the present study. Zirconia core materials were manufactured on dental implants by using CAD/CAM device and they were randomly divided into 6 groups (n=20) according to surface pretreatments; control group (Group C), airborne-particle abrasion (Group AA), silica-coating (Group SC), Nd:YAG laser (Group N), bur-cut from cervical region (Group BC), and bur-cut on the functional tubercule (Group BT). Cementation was succeeded with two different types of cements including a dual-cure resin-cement and a glass ionomer cement. The obtained data were evaluated statistically using one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (p=0.05). Results: No statistically significant difference was found between the groups (p>0.05). Similarly, no statistically significant difference was found between the resin cement and glass ionomer groups with respect to fracture strength values (p>0.05). Conclusion: Within the limitations of the present study, surface treatments and cement have no effect on the flexural strength of zirconia ceramic crowns.

🔖

Cite This Article

Akin, H., Akar, T. (2022). Investigation of Fracture Resistance of Zirconia Restorations After Different Surface Treatments. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 320–323. https://ajindex.com/articles/474206

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Alayad AS. Effect of Zirconia Core Thickness and Veneer Firing Cycle on the Biaxial Flexural Strength of Veneering Ceramic. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(1):26-33
  2. Hamza TA, Sherif RM. Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Glass-Ceramics Versus Bilayered Zirconia-Based Restorations. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(1):e259-e264
  3. Al-Wahadni A, Shahin A, Kurtz KS. Veneered zirconia-based restorations fracture resistance analysis.J Prosthodont. 2018;27(7):651-658
  4. Turk AG, Ulusoy M, Yuce M, Akin H. Effect of different veneering techniques on the fracture strength of metal and zirconia frameworks. J Adv Prosthodont. 2015;7(6):454-9 5. Pereira GKR, Fraga S, Montagner AF, Soares FZM, Kleverlaan CJ, Valandro LF. The effect of grinding on the mechanical behavior of Y-TZP ceramics: A systematic review and meta-analyses. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;63:417-442
  5. Song JY, Park SW, Lee K, Yun KD, Lim HP. Fracture strength and microstructure of Y-TZP zirconia after different surface treatments. J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Oct;110(4):274-80
  6. Kim SY, Choi JW, Ju SW, Ahn JS, Yoon MJ, Huh JB. Fracture Strength After Fatigue Loading of Lithium Disilicate Pressed Zirconia Crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 2016 Jul-Aug;29(4):369-71
  7. Sailer I, Fäher A, Filser F, Gauckler L, Lüthy H, Hämmerle CH. Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:383-8
  8. Sailer I, Féher A, Filser F, Lüthy H, Gauckler LJ, Scharer P, et al. Prospective clinical study of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 3-year follow-up. Quintessence Int 2006;37:685-93
  9. Akın H, Ozkurt Z, Kırmalı O, Kazazoglu E, Ozdemir AK. Shear bond strength of resin cement to zirconia ceramic after aluminum oxide sandblasting and various laser treatments. Photomed Laser Surg. 2011;29(12):797-802
  10. Khan AA, Al Kheraif AA, Jamaluddin S, Elsharawy M, Divakar DD. Recent Trends in Surface Treatment Methods for Bonding Composite Cement to Zirconia: A Reveiw. J Adhes Dent. 2017;19(1):7-19
  11. Yun JY, Ha SR, Lee JB, Kim SH. Effect of sandblasting and various metal primers on the shear bond strength of resin cement to Y-TZP ceramic. Dent Mater 2010;26(7):650-8
  12. Ersu B, Yuzugullu B, Yazici AR, Canay S. Surface roughness and bond strengths of glass-infiltrated alumina-ceramics prepared using various surface treatments. J Dent 2009;37:848–56
  13. Akin GE, Kaval ME, Turk T, Akin H. Surface roughness and bond strength of zirconia posts to a resin cement after various