Journals / Civilacademy Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Does the treaty of Lizbon Promise a more manageable European Union?

Lizbon antlaşması daha 'yönetilebilir' bir Avrupa Birliği vaad ediyor mu?

Pages
161–177
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

What exactly has been changed and what new problems will emerge as a result of these changes?

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Can the Treaty of Lisbon still be ratified, after the ‘No’ vote in the Irish referendum?
📊
Key Findings & Data:The reason for the Treaty of Lisbon was to restore the discarded 2005 constitutional treaty.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:What exactly has been changed and what new problems will emerge as a result of these changes?
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Can the Treaty of Lisbon still be ratified, after the ‘No’ vote in the Irish referendum? Or could it at least be implemented in practice, even if it is not ratified? What would be the impact of Treaty of Lisbon upon the decision making processes of the EU? This Article analysis examines each of these three issues in turn, from a legal point of view. The reason for the Treaty of Lisbon was to restore the discarded 2005 constitutional treaty. It will allow the European Union to function more successfully and democratically following its enlargement from 15 to 27 members. Does the treaty realize these aims? What exactly has been changed and what new problems will emerge as a result of these changes?

Özet

Bu makale AB’nin yaşadığı çok büyük ve önemli genişleme süreçleri akabinde içine düştüğü ‘yönetilme’ sorununu anayasa tartışmaları ve akabinde gelinen Lizbon antlaşması çerçevesinde tartışmayı hedeşemiştir. AB’nin içinden geçtiği reform sürecinde yaşanılan tecrübeler, üye ülkelerinin bu sürece tepkisi ve varılmak istenilen daha demokratik bir AB tahayyülü farklı dinamikler açısından ele alınmaya çalışılmıştır. Detaylı bir şekilde anayasa krizini tasvir eden makale bu tecrübeden yola çıkılarak Lizbon antlaşmasında hangi önceliklere yer verdiğini ya da verilmek zorunda kalındığını örneklerle izah etmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GENÇ, S. (2022). Does the treaty of Lizbon Promise a more manageable European Union?. Civilacademy Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 161–177. https://ajindex.com/articles/474117

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Abdul Noury and Gérard Roland: Democratic Politics in the European Parliament, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2007.
  2. Ahmet Nuri, Yurdusev: "Re-visiting the European Identity Formation: The Turkish Other", Journal of South Asian and Middle Eastern Studies, Vol. XXX, No. 3 2007, pp. 62-73.
  3. Bache, I. ve Şinders, M.: Multi-Level Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2004
  4. Christoph Gusy, DemokratiedeŞzite postnationaler Gemeinschaften unter Berücksichtigung der EU, in: Zeitschrift für Politik, 45 (1998) 3, S. 267 - 281, hier S. 267. Daniel Gros and Sebastian Kurpas: What next? How to save the Treaty of Lisbon, CEPS Policy Briefs, 2008 Gencer Özcan, “Turkey, the EU and the Military’s Changing Mindset: Back to Barracks?” The Süleyman Demirel Program for Contemporary Turkish Studies ve The Moshe Dayan Center for Middle Eastern and African Studies, Turkey and EU, Tel Aviv, The Moshe Dayan Center ve The Süleyman Demirel Program for Contemporary Turkish Studies, 2006. Gianfranco Pasquino: The Democratic Legitimation of European Institutions 2002, http://www.iai.it/pdf/articles/pasquino.pdf
  5. Heeger, Comparison of the 2007 Lisbon Treaty with the earlier EU Constitution, EUWatch issue 8, October 2007
  6. Hooghe, L. ve Marks, G.:, Multi-Level Governance and European Integration. Lanham MD: Rowman and LittleŞeld. 2001 Ibrahim; Canbolat. AB`nin Kuruluş Felsefesi ve Yeni Avrupa`nın Yapılanması, Der. Ertan Efegil-Mehmet Magnette, P.: “European Governance and Civic Participation: Can the Euroepan Union Be Politicised?” 2001 Marcus Höreth/Ludger Kühnhardt/Cordula Janowski: Die Europäische Verfassung. Analyse und Bewertung ihrer Strukturentscheidungen, Baden-Baden 2005.
  7. Jopp, Mathias/Matl, Saskia: Der Vertrag über eine Verfassung für Europa. Analysen zur Konstitutionalisierung der EU, Baden-Baden: Nomos 2005 Rudolf Streinz/Christoph Ohler/Christoph Herrmann (2005). Die neue Verfassung für Europa. Einführung mit Synopse, München. Seyfettin Erol, Türkiye-AB İlişkileri: Avrupa`nın Genişlemesi, Müzakere Süreci ve Batılılaşma Sorunsalı, 2007 Simon Hix: What’s Wrong with the European Union and How to Şx It, Cambridge 2007 Simon Hix: What’s Wrong with the European Union and How to Şx It, Cambridge 2007 Stefan Köppl: Von der Verfassungskrise zum Vertrag von Lissabon – die EU auf dem Weg zu mehr EfŞzienz und Demokratie? In (Neyer, Jürgen; Terhechte, Jörg Philipp; Vaubel, Roland;Tomann,Horst: Demokratieprobleme in der Europäischen Union.) Thalmaier, Bettina 2005: Die zukünftige