Journals / Civilacademy Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

Ana dil edinimi ve ikinci dil öğreniminin pedagojik karşılaştırması

A pedagogiacal comparison of first language acquisition and second language learning

Pages
1–16
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It can be concluded that foreign language teachers can benefit from first language acquisition theory while they plan their teaching practices in classrooms provided that they are cautious about the intrinsic fundamental differences between the two processes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Many second language teaching methods (e.g.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Natural Approach, Total Physical Response, Lexical Approach, Direct Method) claim that the very best method should be similar to or draw conclusions from first language acquisition.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It can be concluded that foreign language teachers can benefit from first language acquisition theory while they plan their teaching practices in classrooms provided that they are cautious about the intrinsic fundamental differences between the two processes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Many second language teaching methods (e.g. Natural Approach, Total Physical Response, Lexical Approach, Direct Method) claim that the very best method should be similar to or draw conclusions from first language acquisition. This article first presents basic information and some recent findings on first language acquisition, with a comparison of it and second language learning, and then makes informed comparisons together with concrete teaching suggestions primarily for language teachers who teach English in foreign language learning contexts. It can be concluded that foreign language teachers can benefit from first language acquisition theory while they plan their teaching practices in classrooms provided that they are cautious about the intrinsic fundamental differences between the two processes.

Özet

Pek çok yabancı dil öğretim metodu (ör: Doğal Yaklaşım, Doğrudan Öğretim Yöntemi) en iyi dil öğrenme yöntemlerinin, ana dil edinimi sırasında izlenen süreçleri takip ederek uygulanan yöntemler olduğunu savunmaktadır. Bu makale, öncelikle ana dil edinimi ile ilgili temel bazı bilgileri ve bir kısım son bulguları sunmakta, daha sonra da ikinci dil/yabancı dil öğrenimi ile karşılaştırmasını yapmaktadır. Bunun yanında, İngilizceyi yabancı dil olarak öğreten öğretmenlere bu karşılaştırmadan çıkartılan somut öğretim teknikleri önerilmektedir. Denilebilir ki, iki süreç arasındaki temel farklılıklar konusunda dikkatli ve bilinçli olmak şartıyla, yabancı dil öğretmenlerinin sınıf içi öğretim uygulamaları konusunda ana dil edinimi teorisinden yararlanacakları çok şey vardır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAATA, C. (2022). Ana dil edinimi ve ikinci dil öğreniminin pedagojik karşılaştırması. Civilacademy Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 1–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/474085

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Brown, H.Douglas. (1972). “Cognitive pruning and second language acquisition”. Modern Language Journal, 56: 218-222.
  2. Brown, H.Douglas. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. (5th ed.). NY: Pearson Education Inc., 2007.
  3. Brown, H. Douglas, and Gonzo, Suzan T. Readings on Second Language Acquisition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents, 1995.
  4. Brown, Roger and Hanlon, Camille. “Derivational complexity and order of acquisition in child speech” In Hayes, J. (Ed.) Cognition and the Development of Language. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1970.
  5. Carroll, David W. Psychology of Language. (5th ed.). Canada: Thomson Wadsworth, 2008.
  6. Caroll, Susanne E. Input and Evidence. The raw material of second language acquisition. Philadelphia, PA, USA: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2001.
  7. Cook, Vivian J. (1969). “The analogy between first and second language learning”, IRAL, VII/3: 207-216, Reprinted in R. Lugton (ed.), Towards a Cognitive Approach to Second Language Acquisition, CCD, 1971.
  8. Cook, Vivian J. (1973). “The comparison of language development in native children and foreign adults”. IRAL, XI/1: 13-28,
  9. Cook, Vivian J. “Universal grammar”, entry in M. Byram (ed.), The Routledge Encyclopedia of Language Teaching and Language Learning. London: Routledge, 2000: 646-649
  10. Çelik, Mehmet. Linguistics for Students of English II. Ankara: EDM, 2007.
  11. D'anglejan, Alison. and Tucker, G.Richard. (1975). “The acquisition of complex English structures by adult learners”. Language Learning, XV/2: 281-296.
  12. DeCasper, Anthony J., and Fifer, William P. (1980). “Of human bonding: Newborns prefer their mothers’ voices.” Science, 208: 1174-1176.
  13. DeCasper, Anthony J., and Spence, Melanie J. (1986). “Prenatal maternal speech inşuences newborns’ perception of speech sounds.” Infant Behavior and Development, 9: 133-150
  14. Dulay, Heidi et al. Language Two. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.
  15. Ellis, Rod. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. New York: Oxford University Press, 1984
  16. Finegan, Edward. Language: Its structure and use. USA:Harcourt Brace, 1989.
  17. Fisher, C., and Tokura H. (1995). “The given-new contract in speech to infants.” Journal of Memory and Language, 34: 287-310.
  18. Gleason, Jean Berko. “The development of language: An overview and a preview”. In Gleason, Jean Berko and Nan Bernstein Ratner. The Development of Language. (7th Edition). USA: Pearson Education, Inc., 2008: 1-36
  19. Ingram., David. First language acquisition: Method, description, and explanation. New York