Journals / Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 4

Investigation of Staphylococcus spp. and Escherichia coli Colonization and Biofilm Formation on University Students’ Mobile Phones and Hands

Pages
839–844
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Especially hand hygiene should be carefully provided and mobile phones should be regularly cleaned in order to prevent bacterial colonization of mobile phones, and prevention strategies should be developed in terms of public health

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Mobile phones, which became indispensable in our daily lives, are likely to be colonized by microorganisms found in the hands of people using them.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, a total of 30 mobile phones and owner hands (30) were screened for Staphylococcus and E. coli contamination in university students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Especially hand hygiene should be carefully provided and mobile phones should be regularly cleaned in order to prevent bacterial colonization of mobile phones, and prevention strategies should be developed in terms of public health
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:31 samples
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Mobile phones, which became indispensable in our daily lives, are likely to be colonized by microorganisms found in the hands of people using them. In this study, a total of 30 mobile phones and owner hands (30) were screened for Staphylococcus and E. coli contamination in university students. Colonization was screened in these samples, and their susceptibility to 11 antimicrobials in different groups. And, oxacillin salt agar screening test was performed to detect methicillin resistance. Microplate (MP) method, Congo Red Agar (CRA) method and Standard Tube (ST) method were used to determine biofilm formation. According to our results, E. coli colonization was no found in any sample, while 31 samples were isolated as Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci (CoNS) and 2 samples as Staphylococcus aureus. All 33 Staphylococci isolates were found to be susceptible to vancomycin and rifampicin, while 27% were found to be resistant to oxacilline, 36% to cefoxitin, 70% to ampicillin, 48% to tetracycline, 76% to erythromycin, 70% to penicillin, 30% to gentamicin, 30% to ampicillin-clavulanic acid, 24% to ciprofloxacin, 27% to ciprofloxacin, 27% to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and 27% to methicillin. It was determined that 9 (27.2 %) of the 33 Staphlococci isolates was resistant to methicillin. Staphylococci were 100% biofilm producers according to the microplate method. Especially hand hygiene should be carefully provided and mobile phones should be regularly cleaned in order to prevent bacterial colonization of mobile phones, and prevention strategies should be developed in terms of public health

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, E. Ş., ÇETİN, S. K. (2022). Investigation of Staphylococcus spp. and Escherichia coli Colonization and Biofilm Formation on University Students’ Mobile Phones and Hands. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 4, 839–844. https://ajindex.com/articles/472300

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Tagoe, D.N, Gyande, V.K, Ansah, E.O, Bacterial Contamination of Mobile Phones: When Your Mobile Phone Could Transmit More Than Just a Call, Webmed Central Microbiology, 2011, 2(10), 1-12
  2. Borer, A, Gilad, J, Smolyakov, R, Eskira, S, Peled, N, Porat, N, Hyam, E, Trefler, R, Riesenberg, K, Schlaeffer, F, Cell phones and Acinetobacter transmission. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 2005, 11, 1160-1161
  3. Ulger, F, Dilek, A, Esen, S, Sunbul, M, Leblebicioglu, H, Are healthcare workers’ mobile phones a potential source of nosocomial infections? Review of the literatüre. The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, 2015, 9(10), 1046-1053
  4. Thomas, W, Oller, A.R, Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas isolated from mobile phones and cheek and ear locales. British Journal of Medicine & Medical Research, 2016, 11(6), 1-8
  5. Grice, A.E, Segre, A.J, The skin microbiome. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2011, 9(4), 244–253
  6. Karabay, O, Kocoglu, E, Tahtaci, M, The role of mobile phones in the spread of bacteria associated with nosocomial infections. The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, 2007, 1, 72-73
  7. Jayalakshmi, J, Appalaraju, B, Usha, S, Cellphones as reservoirs of nosocomial pathogens. Journal Association Physicians India, 2008, 56, 388-389
  8. Singh, S, Acharya, S, Bhat, M, Rao, S.K, Pentapati, K.C, Mobile phone hygiene: potential risks posed by use in the clinics of an Indian dental school. Journal of Dental Education, 2010, 74, 1153-1158
  9. Srikanth, P, Rajaram, E, Sudharsanam, S, Lakshmanan, A, Mariappan, U.S.S, Jagannathan, K, Mobile phones: emerging threat for infection control. Journal of Infection Prevention, 2010, 11, 87-90
  10. Tekerekoǧlu, M.S, Duman, Y, Serindağ, A, Cuǧlan, S.S, Kaysadu, H, Tunc, E, Yakupogullari, Y, Do mobile phones of patients, companions and visitors carry multidrug-resistant hospital pathogens? American Journal of Infection Control, 2011, 39, 379- 381
  11. Martins, A, Cunha, Mde.L, Methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci: epidemiological and molecular aspects. Microbiology and Immunology, 2007, 51, 787-795
  12. Kramer, A, Schwebke, I, Kampf, G, How long do nosocomial pathogens persist on inanimate surfaces? A systematic review. BMC Infectious Diseases, 2006, 6, 130
  13. Szczuka, E, Kaznowski, A, Antimicrobial activity of tigecycline alone or in combination with rifampin against Staphylococcus epidermidis in biofilm. Folia Microbiologica, (Praha), 2014, 59, 283-8