Journals / Cardiovascular surgery and interventions / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Does Shamblin classification affect the clinical outcomes followingcarotid body tumor excision?

Pages
91–97
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The length of stay in the hospital and intensive careunit, total amount of drainage, rates of postoperative cranial nerve involvement, permanent neurological damage, disease recurrence,postoperative TIA, and dysphagia were found to be significantly increased in patients in the Shamblin type 3 (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: In this study, we present the late results of patients who underwent carotid body tumor (CBT) resection and comparedpostoperative complication rates according to the Shamblin classification.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and methods: Between April 2012 and April 2019, a total of 55 consecutive patients (20 males, 35 females; mean age: 56.2±1.8years; range, 38 to 62 years) who were operated for CBTs were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The length of stay in the hospital and intensive careunit, total amount of drainage, rates of postoperative cranial nerve involvement, permanent neurological damage, disease recurrence,postoperative TIA, and dysphagia were found to be significantly increased in patients in the Shamblin type 3 (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: In this study, we present the late results of patients who underwent carotid body tumor (CBT) resection and comparedpostoperative complication rates according to the Shamblin classification. Patients and methods: Between April 2012 and April 2019, a total of 55 consecutive patients (20 males, 35 females; mean age: 56.2±1.8years; range, 38 to 62 years) who were operated for CBTs were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were classified according to theShamblin classification. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients, postoperative complications, total amount of drainage,and length of hospital and intensive care unit stay were recorded. Results: Carotid body tumors were bilateral in five patients, while they involved only the right side in 23 and left side in 27 patients. TheCBTs were Shamblin type 1 in 16, type 2 in 31, and type 3 in eight patients. Intraoperative vascular reconstruction was required in eightpatients. Early postoperative morbidities were transient ischemic attack (TIA) in three, cranial involvement in nine, middle cerebral arteryocclusion in one, dysphonia in six, dysphagia in six, and hemiparesthesia in one patient. Permanent neurological damage (hoarseness10.9%, ptosis 45%, internal carotid artery 1.81%) was seen in 18.2% of the cases. The length of stay in the hospital and intensive careunit, total amount of drainage, rates of postoperative cranial nerve involvement, permanent neurological damage, disease recurrence,postoperative TIA, and dysphagia were found to be significantly increased in patients in the Shamblin type 3 (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDEM, H. (2022). Does Shamblin classification affect the clinical outcomes followingcarotid body tumor excision?. Cardiovascular surgery and interventions, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 91–97. https://ajindex.com/articles/471055

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Luna-Ortiz K, Rascon-Ortiz M, Villavicencio-Valencia V, Granados-Garcia M, Herrera-Gomez A. Carotid body tumors: Review of a 20-year experience. Oral Oncol 2005;41:56-61
  2. Sajid MS, Hamilton G, Baker DM; Joint Vascular Research Group. A multicenter review of carotid body tumour management. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007;34:127-30
  3. Sykes JM, Ossoff RH. Paragangliomas of the head and neck. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1986;19:755-67
  4. Sanlı A, Oz K, Ayduran E, Aydın S, Altın G, Eken M. Carotid body tumors and our surgical approaches. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;64:158-61
  5. O'Neill S, O'Donnell M, Harkin D, Loughrey M, Lee B, Blair P. A 22-year Northern Irish experience of carotid body tumours. Ulster Med J 2011;80:133-40
  6. Düzlü M, Yılmaz M, Tutar H, Karamert R, Sahin M, Karaloglu F, et al. Our surgical experience on carotid body paragangliomas and literature review. Gazi Medical Journal 2017;28:120-4
  7. Shamblin WR, ReMine WH, Sheps SG, Harrison EG Jr. Carotid body tumor (chemodectoma). Clinicopathologic analysis of ninety cases. Am J Surg 1971;122:732-9
  8. Kunt A, Bulut F, Demir CY. Karotis cisim tümörleri. Turkish J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;11:198-200
  9. Wang SJ, Wang MB, Barauskas TM, Calcaterra TC. Surgical management of carotid body tumors. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;123:202-6
  10. Pacheco-Ojeda L. Malignant carotid body tumors: Report of three cases. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2001;110:36-40
  11. Köhler HF, Carvalho AL, Mattos Granja NV, Nishinari K, Kowalski LP. Surgical treatment of paragangliomas of the carotid bifurcation: Results of 36 patients. Head Neck 2004;26:1058-63
  12. Plukker JT, Brongers EP, Vermey A, Krikke A, van den Dungen JJ. Outcome of surgical treatment for carotid body paraganglioma. Br J Surg 2001;88:1382-6
  13. Koskas F, Vignes S, Khalil I, Koskas I, Dziekiewicz M, Elmkies F, et al. Carotid chemodectomas: Long-term results of subadventitial resection with deliberate external carotid resection. Ann Vasc Surg 2009;23:67-75
  14. Persky MS, Setton A, Niimi Y, Hartman J, Frank D, Berenstein A. Combined endovascular and surgical treatment of head and neck paragangliomas--a team approach. Head Neck 2002;24:423-31
  15. Dixon JL, Atkins MD, Bohannon WT, Buckley CJ, Lairmore TC. Surgical management of carotid body tumors: A 15-year single institution experience employing an interdisciplinary approach. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2016;29:16-20
  16. Texakalidis P, Charisis N, Giannopoulos S, Xenos D, Rangel-Cas