SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Business and Management Studies: An International Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4

PERCEIVED ENVIRONMENTAL UNCERTAINTY AND INNOVATION ADOPTION: EXPLORING THE TURKISH CONTEXT

ALGILANAN ÇEVRESEL BELİRSİZLİK VE İNOVASYONU BENİMSEME: TÜRKİYE BAĞLAMINI KEŞFETME

Çiğdem KAYA
Göksel ATAMAN
İbrahim H. ELBAŞI
Pages
770–789
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results of the study indicate that government andpolicies factor is the effective factor on managers’ decisions on innovation adoption, and in uncertainenvironments in terms of governmental and policy factor, managers choose to adopt both types of innovation sincethey want avoid to take risks of adopting solely one type of innovation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Because innovation and environmental uncertainty are highly crucial concepts for organizations’survival, and managers are key decision makers in organizational operations, investigating the relationshipbetween innovation and environmental uncertainty from managers’ lenses is important.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data collected from 230 managers that work for companies that operate in various industries has beenanalyzed by using Multinomial logistic regression analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results of the study indicate that government andpolicies factor is the effective factor on managers’ decisions on innovation adoption, and in uncertainenvironments in terms of governmental and policy factor, managers choose to adopt both types of innovation sincethey want avoid to take risks of adopting solely one type of innovation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Because innovation and environmental uncertainty are highly crucial concepts for organizations’survival, and managers are key decision makers in organizational operations, investigating the relationshipbetween innovation and environmental uncertainty from managers’ lenses is important. This study aims to explorehow managers’ adoption of radical and incremental innovation is affected by perceived environmental uncertainty(PEU). Data collected from 230 managers that work for companies that operate in various industries has beenanalyzed by using Multinomial logistic regression analysis. Results of the study indicate that government andpolicies factor is the effective factor on managers’ decisions on innovation adoption, and in uncertainenvironments in terms of governmental and policy factor, managers choose to adopt both types of innovation sincethey want avoid to take risks of adopting solely one type of innovation.

Özet

İnovasyon ve çevresel belirsizlik kuruluşların hayatta kalması için son derece önemli kavramlar olduğundan ve yöneticiler örgütsel operasyonlarda kilit karar vericiler olduğundan, yöneticilerin merceklerinden inovasyon ve çevresel belirsizlik arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmak önemlidir. Bu çalışma, yöneticilerin radikal ve artımsal inovasyonu benimsemelerinin çevresel belirsizlikten (PEU) nasıl etkilendiğini araştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Çeşitli sektörlerde faaliyet gösteren şirketlerde çalışan 230 yöneticiden toplanan veriler, Multinomial lojistik regresyon analizi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Sonuçlar, hükümet ve politikalar faktörünün yöneticilerin inovasyonun benimsenmesine ilişkin kararları üzerinde etkili bir faktör olduğunu ve belirsiz ortamlarda, ‘devlet ve politika faktörü açısından’, yöneticilerin yalnızca bir yenilik türünü benimsemenin riskini almaktan kaçındıkları için her iki yeniliği benimsemeyi tercih ettiklerini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, Ç., ATAMAN, G., ELBAŞI, İ. H. (2022). PERCEIVED ENVIRONMENTAL UNCERTAINTY AND INNOVATION ADOPTION: EXPLORING THE TURKISH CONTEXT. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4, 770–789. https://ajindex.com/articles/470603

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Andriopoulos, C. and Lewis, M. W. (2009). “Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: managing paradoxes of innovation”, Organization Science, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 696-717.
  2. Austin, J. E. 1990. Managing in developing countries. New York: Free Press.
  3. Benner, M. J., and Tushman, M. L. (2003). “Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 28, pp. 238-256.
  4. Cameron, C., and Trivedi, P. (2010). Microeconometrics Using Stata. Texas: Stata Press.
  5. Christensen, C.M. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  6. Çetin, C. (2009). Liderlik stilleri, değişim yönetimi ve ekip çalışması [Leadership styles, change management and team works], İstanbul:
  7. İTO Yayınları.
  8. Daft, R. and Weick, K. (1984) “Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 9 No.2, pp. 284–95.
  9. Damanpour, F. and Schneider, M. (2006). “Phases of the adoption of innovation in organizations: effects of environment, organization and top managers”, British Journal of Management, Vol. 17, pp. 215–236.
  10. De Lancer Julnes, P. And Holzer, M. (2001). “Promoting utilization of performance measures in public organizations: an empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 61 No. 6, pp. 693-708.
  11. Dewar, R.D. and J.E. Dutton (1986) "The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: an empirical analysis", Management Science, Vol. 32 No. 11, pp. 1422-1433.
  12. Duncan, R.B. (1972). “Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 17, pp. 313-327.
  13. Duquenne, M.-N., & Vlontzos, G. (2012). “The Greek olive oil market and the factor affecting it”. Discussion Paper Series, pp. 61-82.
  14. Elhamma, A. (2015). The relationship between activity based costing, perceived environmental uncertainty and global performance, International Journal of Management, Accounting and Economics, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp.73-90.
  15. Ettlie, J. E. (1983). “Organizational policy and innovation among suppliers to the food processing sector”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 27-44.
  16. Fores, B. and Camison, C. (2016). “Does incremental and radical innovation performance depend on different types of knowledge accumulation capabilities and organizational size?”, Journal of Business Research, Vol.69, pp. 831–848.
  17. Germain, R. (1996). “The role of contex