SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Business and Management Studies: An International Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY IN QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

NİCEL ARAŞTIRMADA GEÇERLİLİK VE GÜVENİLİRLİK

Lütfi SÜRÜCÜ
Ahmet MASLAKÇI
Pages
2694–2726
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It isconsidered that this study, which is a review, will attract the attention of researchers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Validity and Reliability of the scales used in research are essential factorsthat enable the research to yield beneficial results.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this reason, it is useful to understandhow the Reliability and Validity of the scales are measured correctly by researchers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It isconsidered that this study, which is a review, will attract the attention of researchers.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The Validity and Reliability of the scales used in research are essential factorsthat enable the research to yield beneficial results. For this reason, it is useful to understandhow the Reliability and Validity of the scales are measured correctly by researchers. Theprimary purpose of this study is to provide information on how the researchers test theValidity and Reliability of the scales used in their empirical studies and to provideresources for future research. For this purpose, the concepts of Validity and Reliability areintroduced, and detailed explanations have been provided regarding the main methods usedin the evaluation of Validity and Reliability with examples taken from the literature. It isconsidered that this study, which is a review, will attract the attention of researchers.

Özet

Araştırmada kullanılan ölçeklerin geçerliliği ve güvenilirliği araştırmanın sağlıklı sonuçlar vermesini sağlayan önemli faktörlerdir. Bu nedenle, güvenilirliğinin ve geçerliliğinin araştırmacılar tarafından nasıl doğru ölçüldüğünü anlamak faydalıdır. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, araştırmacıların ampirik araştırmalarında kullandığı ölçeklerin geçerliliği ve güvenirliliğini nasıl test edecekleri konusunda bilgi sunmak ve ileride yapılacak olan araştırmalara yönelik kaynak sağlamaktır. Bu maksatla çalışmada, geçerlik ve güvenirlik kavramları tanıtılmış ve literatürden alınan örneklerle geçerlik ve güvenirlik değerlendirilmesinde kullanılan ana yöntemlere ilişkin ayrıntılı açıklamalar yapılmıştır. Derleme olarak yapılan bu çalışmanın araştırmacıların ilgisini çekeceği değerlendirilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÜRÜCÜ, L., MASLAKÇI, A. (2022). VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY IN QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 2694–2726. https://ajindex.com/articles/470455

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18.
  2. Aksay, B., & Ünal, A. Y. (2016). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi Kapsamında Formatif Ve Reflektif Ölçüm. Çağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(2), 1-21.
  3. Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing. Prentice Hall/Pearson Education. Ayre, C., & Scally, A. J. (2014). Critical values for Lawshe's content validity ratio: Revisiting the original methods of calculation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47(1), 79-86.
  4. Bollen, K. A. (1989). The consequences of measurement error. Structural Equations with Latent Variables, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 151-178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1038416217724516.
  5. Bowling, A. (2014). Research methods in health: Investigating health and health services. McGraw-hill education (UK). Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitraitmultimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81. Carifio, J., & Perla, R. J. (2007). Ten common misunderstandings, misconceptions, persistent myths and urban legends about Likert scales and Likert response formats and their antidotes. Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3), 106-116.
  6. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297- 334. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281. Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and Reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
  7. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis 5th ed. New Jersey, NJ: Printice-Hall. Henson R.K., & Roberts J. K. (2006) Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Published Research: Common Errors and Some Comment on Improved Practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 66(3). Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort‐reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287-302.
  8. Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Pucik, V., & Welbourne, T. M. (1999). Managerial coping with organizational change: A dispositional perspective. Jour