SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Business and Economics Research Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

Adaptation of Compulsory Citizenship Behavior Scale into Turkish: The Validity and Reliability Study

Zorunlu Vatandaşlık Davranışı Ölçeğinin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Lütfi SÜRÜCÜ
Ahmet MASLAKÇI
Harun ŞEŞEN
Pages
571–579
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings showed that compulsory citizenship behavior scale, which is translated and adapted to Turkish, is a valid and reliable instrument and it could be used in further researches in Turkey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the study is to adapt and translate the compulsory citizenship behavior scale developed by Vigado-Gadot (2007) into Turkish.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, five-star hotel employees in Muğla were surveyed (n=287).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings showed that compulsory citizenship behavior scale, which is translated and adapted to Turkish, is a valid and reliable instrument and it could be used in further researches in Turkey.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of the study is to adapt and translate the compulsory citizenship behavior scale developed by Vigado-Gadot (2007) into Turkish. Thus, it is aimed to adapt the scale into Turkish literature. For this purpose, five-star hotel employees in Muğla were surveyed (n=287). The linguistic equivalence, convergent validity, construct validity and reliability of the scale were tested according to the obtained data. The findings showed that compulsory citizenship behavior scale, which is translated and adapted to Turkish, is a valid and reliable instrument and it could be used in further researches in Turkey.

Özet

Araştırmanın amacı, Vigado-Gadot (2007) tarafından geliştirilen zorunlu vatandaşlık davranışı ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlaması ve çevirisinin yapılmasıdır. Böylelikle ölçeğin Türkçe yazınına kazandırılması amaçlanmaktadır. Bu maksatla Muğla’da faaliyet gösteren beş yıldızlı otel çalışanlarına anket uygulaması yapılmıştır (n=287). Elde edilen veriler doğrultusunda ölçeğin dilsel eşdeğerlik, yakınsak geçerlilik (benzeşim geçerliliği), yapı geçerliği ve güvenilirliği test edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular uyarlama ve çeviri çalışması yapılan zorunlu vatandaşlık davranışı ölçeğinin geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu ve Türkiye’deki araştırmalarda kullanılabileceğini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÜRÜCÜ, L., MASLAKÇI, A., ŞEŞEN, H. (2020). Adaptation of Compulsory Citizenship Behavior Scale into Turkish: The Validity and Reliability Study. Business and Economics Research Journal, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 571–579. https://ajindex.com/articles/165824

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Akinlotu, O., & Ertan, Ş. S. (2018) An assesment of perceived stress sources among university students: European University of Lefke context. LAÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(1), 35-48.
  2. Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (2002). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS release 10 for Windows: A guide for social scientists. Routledge. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of test. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
  3. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
  4. Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2014). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara:
  5. Seçkin Yayıncılık. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6. baskı). Hambleton, R. K., & Bollwark, J. (1991). Adapting tests for use in different cultures: Technical issues and methods. U.S. Department of Education, 1-44.
  6. Harrington, D. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis. Oxford University Press.
  7. Ke, W., & Wei, K. K. (2008). Organizational culture and leadership in ERP implementation. Decision Support Systems, 45(2), 208-218.
  8. Kline, P. (2014). An easy guide to factor analysis. Routledge. Meydan, C. H., & Şeşen, H. (2011). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi AMOS uygulamaları. Detay Yayıncılık. Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It's construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10(2), 85- 97. Organ, P., Philip, M., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Sage, Thousand Oaks, 16, 43-44.
  9. Peng, Z. L., & Zhao, H. D. (2012). Does organization citizenship behavior really benefit the organization? Study on the compulsory citizenship behavior in China. Nankai Business Review International, 3(1), 75-92.
  10. Podsakoff, P. M., Ahearne, M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 262. Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 653. Vigoda‐Gadot, E. (2006). Compulsory citizenship behavior: Theorizing some dark sides of the good soldier syndrome in organizations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 36(1), 77-93.
  11. Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2007). Leadership style, organizational politics, and employees' performance: A