Journals / Bornova Veteriner Bilimleri Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 47

Isolation of Vibrio parahaemolyticus from bivalve molluscs

Çift kabuklu yumuşakçalardan Vibrio parahaemolyticus izolasyonu

Pages
1–8
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, we concluded that V. parahaemolyticus isolates from bivalve molluscs which weobtained may pose a risk for human health.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A total of 1330 samples of live bivalve molluscs that come to the Bornova Veterinary Control and Research Institutebetween 2004–2009 were analysed according to TS ISO/ 8914.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The isolation rate of Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 4.28 % inbivalve molluscs tested.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, we concluded that V. parahaemolyticus isolates from bivalve molluscs which weobtained may pose a risk for human health.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004–2009 · 1330 samples
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

A total of 1330 samples of live bivalve molluscs that come to the Bornova Veterinary Control and Research Institutebetween 2004–2009 were analysed according to TS ISO/ 8914. The isolation rate of Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 4.28 % inbivalve molluscs tested. The isolation rate of the organism in bivalve molluscs were as follows; 8.65 % in oysters (Ostrea edulis,L. 1758), 8.92 % in wedge shells (Donax trunculus, L. 1758), 2.94 % in cockles (Venus verrucosa, L. 1758), 2.71 % in carpetshell clams (Tapes decussatus L. 1758), 1.93 % in bearded mussels (Modiolus barbatus, L. 1758) and 1.90 % in Mediterraneanmussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis, L. 1819). V. parahaemolyticus was not isolated in striped Venus (Chamelea gallina L., 1753).Out of the 57 V. parahaemolyticus isolates, 21 (36.8 %) were found to be positive for Kanagawa Phenomenon (KP) and 7 (12.2%) for urea hydrolysis (UH). As a result, we concluded that V. parahaemolyticus isolates from bivalve molluscs which weobtained may pose a risk for human health.

Özet

Bornova Veteriner Kontrol ve Araştırma Enstitüsü’ne 2004–2009 yılları arasında gelen toplam 1330 adet canlı çift kabukluyumuşakça numunesi TS ISO/8914’e göre muayene edildi ve Vibrio parahaemolyticus’un varlığı % 4.28 (57/1330) olaraksaptandı. Çift kabuklu yumuşakça türlerine göre V. parahaemolyticus izolasyon oranı; kum şırlanında (Donax trunculus, L. 1758)% 8.92, istiridyede (Ostrea edulis, L. 1758) % 8.65, kidonyada (Venus verrucosa, L. 1758) % 2.94, akivadeste (Tapesdecussatus, L. 1758 ) % 2.71, kıllı midyede (Modiolus barbatus, L. 1758) % 1.93 ve kara midyede (Mytilus galloprovincialis L.1819) % 1.90 olarak bulundu. Kum midyesi (Chamelea gallina L., 1753) örneklerinden ise V. parahaemolyticus izole edilmedi.İzole edilen toplam 57 V. parahaemolyticus izolatının 21’i (% 36.8) Kanagawa Fenomeni (KP) pozitif, % 7’si (% 12.2) ürehidroliz testi (UH) pozitif bulundu. Sonuç olarak, çift kabuklu yumuşakçalardan sağlanan V. parahaemolyticus izolatlarının insansağlığı yönünden riskli olabileceği anlaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YABANLI, M., TÜRK, N., AVSEVER, M. L., AYDIN, M. A. (2022). Isolation of Vibrio parahaemolyticus from bivalve molluscs. Bornova Veteriner Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 47, 1–8. https://ajindex.com/articles/467820

References (14)

  1. Abdelnoor, A.M., Roumani, B.M. (1980) Characterization of some Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains isolated from seafoods in Lebanon. Zbl. Bakteriol. (B)., 170 (5-6): 502-507
  2. Akalın, N., Tuna, İ. (1999) Bornova Veteriner Kontrol ve Araştırma Enstitüsünde 1998-1999 yıllarında muayene edilen çift kabuklu yumuşakça ve deniz suyu örneklerinde Vibrio parahaemolyticus izolasyonu. Bornova Vet. Kont. Araşt. Enst. Derg., 38: 85- 90
  3. Alam, M.J., Tomochika, K.I., Miyoshi, S.I., Shinoda, S. (2002) Environmental investigation of potentially pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in the Seto-Inland Sea, Japan. FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 208: 83–87
  4. Anonim. (1998) TS/ISO 8914 Mikrobiyoloji-Vibrio parahaemolyticus aranması için genel kurallar. Ankara
  5. Awad, H.A., El Shater, M.A. (1997) Microbiological status and the depuration of the Egyptian oysters. Vet. Med. J. Giza., 45 (3): 337-343
  6. Aydın, A., Soyutemiz, E. (2002) Bazı balık türlerinden ve kum midyelerinden (Venus gallina) Vibrio parahaemolyticus izolasyonu ve identifikasyonu. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 26: 1249-1253
  7. Baffone, W., Pianetti, A., Bruscolini, F., Barbieri, E., Citterio, B. (2000) Occurrence and expression of virulence related properties of Vibrio species isolated from widely consumed seafood products. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 54: 9–18
  8. Baross, J., Liston, J. (1970) Occurrence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and related hemolytic Vibrios in marine environments of Washington State. Appl. Microbiol., 20 (2): 179-186
  9. Bauer, A., Østensvik, Ø., Florvåg, M., Ørmen, Ø., Rørvik, M. (2006) Occurence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus, V. cholerae, and V. vulnificus in Norwegian blue mussels (Mytilus edulis). Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 72 (4): 3058-3061
  10. Bej, A.K., Patterson, D.P., Brasher, C.W., Vickery, M.C., Kaysner, C.A. (1999) Detection of total and hemolysin-producing Vibrio parahaemolyticus in shellfish using multiplex PCR amplification of tl, tdh and trh. J. Microbiol. Methods, 36: 215–225
  11. Berzero, R., Crescente, M.D., Zaffalon, C. (1982) Vibrio parahaemolyticus in molluscs. G. Bacteriol. Virol. Immunol., 75 (7-12): 264-272
  12. Beuchat, L.R. (1982) Vibrio parahaemolyticus: Public health significance. Food Technol., 25: 80- 83
  13. Binta, M.G., Nyaga, P.N. (1982) The distribution of Vibrio parahaemolyticus serotypes in Kenyan seafish, shellfish, marine water and sediment. Trans. Royal Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg., 76 (4): 497-499
  14. Chan, S.S.W., Nig, K.C., Cheung, T.H., Rainer, T.H. (2002) Vibri par