Journals / Bitki Koruma Bülteni / 2019 / Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 4

Biological control of Alternaria alternata (Fr.) Keissler's in in vitro conditions tomatoes by bacteria

Domateste Alternaria alternata (Fr.) Keissler’in bazı bakteriler ile in vitro şartlarda biyolojik mücadelesi

Pages
57–68
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the dual culture test, the most effective isolate that prevented the development of pathogen fungi was TV 53D (83.33%), followed by RK 84 (79.76%) and TV 6F (78.57%).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Fungal diseases cause significant economic losses in fruits in the field and postharvest.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, a total of 33 bioagent bacteria [Agrobacterium radiobacter (A 16), Bacillus atrophaeus (TV 15B, FD 1), Bacillus cereus (TV 30D and TV 85D), Bacillus megaterium (TV 3D, TV 6D, TV 13C, TV 20E, TV 49A, TV 87A, M3, KBA 10), Bacillus subtilis (TV 6F, TV12H, TV 13B, TV 17C, OSU 142, TV 16F), Bacillus pumilus (TV 67C, TV 73A, IK 39), Brevibacillus choshinensis (TV 53D), Kyluverea cryocrescens (TV 113C), Kocuria rosea (TV 14C), Paenibacillus macerans (T 26), Pantoea agglomerans (RK 92, RK 84), Pseudomonas chlororaphis (IK 37, PM 18), Pseudomonas flourescens (FDG 37, TV 11D), Pseudomonas putida (TV 42A)] were tested against A. alternata in in vitro.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the dual culture test, the most effective isolate that prevented the development of pathogen fungi was TV 53D (83.33%), followed by RK 84 (79.76%) and TV 6F (78.57%).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Fungal diseases cause significant economic losses in fruits in the field and postharvest. Tomatoes, which are of great importance in terms of human health and economically, are sensitive to fungal diseases due to their rich nutrients and water content. Alternaria alternata is defined as one of the most important necrotrophic pathogens in tomato fruit. Biological control method, which is an alternative method to protect fruits and vegetables during storage and shelf life, is utilized due to insufficient controlling and the disadvantages of fungicide use. In this study, a total of 33 bioagent bacteria [Agrobacterium radiobacter (A 16), Bacillus atrophaeus (TV 15B, FD 1), Bacillus cereus (TV 30D and TV 85D), Bacillus megaterium (TV 3D, TV 6D, TV 13C, TV 20E, TV 49A, TV 87A, M3, KBA 10), Bacillus subtilis (TV 6F, TV12H, TV 13B, TV 17C, OSU 142, TV 16F), Bacillus pumilus (TV 67C, TV 73A, IK 39), Brevibacillus choshinensis (TV 53D), Kyluverea cryocrescens (TV 113C), Kocuria rosea (TV 14C), Paenibacillus macerans (T 26), Pantoea agglomerans (RK 92, RK 84), Pseudomonas chlororaphis (IK 37, PM 18), Pseudomonas flourescens (FDG 37, TV 11D), Pseudomonas putida (TV 42A)] were tested against A. alternata in in vitro. According to the results of the dual culture test, the most effective isolate that prevented the development of pathogen fungi was TV 53D (83.33%), followed by RK 84 (79.76%) and TV 6F (78.57%). It is important for the use of three promising bioagent bacteria to be tested against pathogen under different in vivo conditions as a biopesticide.

🔖

Cite This Article

TEKİNER, N., KOTAN, R., TOZLU, E. (2022). Biological control of Alternaria alternata (Fr.) Keissler's in in vitro conditions tomatoes by bacteria. Bitki Koruma Bülteni, Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 4, 57–68. https://ajindex.com/articles/466328

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Aktaş S., 2015. Domates öz nekrozuna neden olan etmenlere karşı PGPR ve biyoajan bakterileri kullanılarak kontrollü koşullarda biyolojik mücadele imkânlarının araştırılması. Atatürk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Yakutiye, Erzurum, 73 s. Arrebola E., Jacobs R., Korsten L., 2010. Iturin A is the principal inhibitor in the biocontrol activity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens PPCB004 against postharvest fungal pathogens. Journal of Applied Microbioliology, 108, 386-395.
  2. Chernin L., Brandis A., Ismailov Z., Chet I., 1996. Pyrrolnitrin production by an Enterobacter agglomerans strain with a broad spectrum of antagonistic activity towards fungal and bacterial phytopathogens. Current Microbiology, 32, 208- 212. Choi M.O., Kim S.G., Hyun I.H., 2010. First report of black spot caused by Alternaria alternata on grafted cactus. Plant Pathology Journal, 26, 80-82.
  3. Dadaşoğlu F., Şahin F., 2010. Bakterilerin Yüzük kelebeği Malacosoma neustria L. (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae)’nın biyolojik mücadelesinde kullanımı. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Atatürk University, 41 (2), 97-104.
  4. De Curtis F., Lima G., Vitullo D., De Cicco V., 2010. Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotium rolfsii on tomato by delivering antagonistic bacteria through a drip irrigation system. Crop Protection, 29, 663-670.
  5. Dutkiewicz J., Mackiewicz B., Lemieszek K.M., Golec M., Milanowski J., 2016. Pantoea agglomerans: a mysterious bacterium of evil and good. Part IV. Beneficial effects. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine, 23 (2), 206- 222. Ekinci M., Turan M., Yıldırım E., Güneş A., Kotan R., Dursun A., 2014. Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on growth, nutrient, organic acid, amino acid and hormone content of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis) transplants. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, 13 (6), 71-85.
  6. Ekinci M., Yıldırım E., Kotan R., 2015. Effects of different plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on growth and quality of broccoli (Brassica oleraceae L. var. italica) seedling. Akdeniz University Journal of Agriculture, 28 (2), 53-59.
  7. Erman M., Kotan R., Çakmakçı R., Çığ F., Karagöz K., Sezen M., 2010. Effect of nitrogen fixing and phosphatesolubilizing rhizobacteria isolated from Van Lake Basin on the growth and quality properties in wheat and sugar beet. Turkey IV. Organic Farming Symposium, 28 June - 1 July 2010,
  8. Erzurum, Turkey, 325-329 p. Espinoza-Verduzco M.D.A., Santos-Cervantes M.E., Fernandez-Herrera E., 2012. First report