SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Alınteri Zirai Bilimler Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 1

Determination of Some Biological Control Agents Against Alternaria Fruit Rot in Quince

Nasibe TEKİNER
RECEP KOTAN
ELİF TOZLU
Fatih DADAŞOĞLU
Pages
25–31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is important to carry out studies in vivo bioassays in order to control postharvest decay with bacterial and fungal bio-agents which are determined to be effective.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The use of bioagents has become important as an alternative to fungicides to prevent postharvest losses in recent years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this aim, dual culture of nine bacterial bio-agents isolate [Bacillus megaterium (TV 3D), Bacillus subtilis (TV 6F, TV 17C, CP 1), Bacillus cereus (TV 85D), Paenibacillus polymxa (TV 12E), Pantoea agglomerans (RK 79, RK 92), Pseudomonas fluorescens (MF 3)] and 3 fungal bioagents [Trichoderma harzianum (ET 4, ET 14, NT 1)] were tested for antagonistic properties against Alternari alternata under in vitro conditions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is important to carry out studies in vivo bioassays in order to control postharvest decay with bacterial and fungal bio-agents which are determined to be effective.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The use of bioagents has become important as an alternative to fungicides to prevent postharvest losses in recent years. In this context, it is aimed to investigate effective of some bacterial and fungal biocontrol agents for control against Alternari alternata, which has a wide range of hosts, leading to losses pre and postharvest. In this aim, dual culture of nine bacterial bio-agents isolate [Bacillus megaterium (TV 3D), Bacillus subtilis (TV 6F, TV 17C, CP 1), Bacillus cereus (TV 85D), Paenibacillus polymxa (TV 12E), Pantoea agglomerans (RK 79, RK 92), Pseudomonas fluorescens (MF 3)] and 3 fungal bioagents [Trichoderma harzianum (ET 4, ET 14, NT 1)] were tested for antagonistic properties against Alternari alternata under in vitro conditions. It has been determined that all bio-agents have an inhibitory effect on the growth of pathogen fungus under in vitro conditions. RK 79 (79.76%) was the most effective isolate in bio-agent bacteria isolates. All of the bio-agent fungal isolates showed a high hyperparasitic effect and the most effective isolate was ET 4 (67.74%). Consequently, promising results were obtained from these bio-agent bacteria and fungi. It is important to carry out studies in vivo bioassays in order to control postharvest decay with bacterial and fungal bio-agents which are determined to be effective.

🔖

Cite This Article

TEKİNER, N., KOTAN, R., TOZLU, E., DADAŞOĞLU, F. (2019). Determination of Some Biological Control Agents Against Alternaria Fruit Rot in Quince. Alınteri Zirai Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 1, 25–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/142371

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Abbo, A. S., Idris, M. O. and Hammad A. M. 2014. The antifungal effects of four tomato rhizosphere Bacillus spp. against Alternaria alternata. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 3(7): 1324-1328.
  2. Acarsoy, N. and Mısırlı, A. 2010. Kayısıda monilyaya dayanıklılık ıslahı. Ege Üniversity Journal of Agriculture, 47 (3):1018-8851.
  3. Agrios, G. N., 1997.
  4. Plant Pathology. Academic Press,
  5. New York, USA. Ahmed I. S., 2017. Biological control of potato brown leaf spot disease caused by Alternaria alternata using Brevibacillus formosus strain DSM 9885 and Brevibacillus brevis strain NBRC 15304. Journal of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, 8(6):1-8.
  6. Arzanlou, M., Khodaei, S., Narmani, A., Ahari, A. and Motallebi A. 2014. Inhibitory effect of Trichoderma isolates on growth of Alternaria alternata, the causal agent of leaf spot disease on sunflower, under laboratory conditions. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 47(13):1592-1599.
  7. Beer, S., Rundle, J.R. and Norelli, J.L. 1984. Recent progress in the development of biological control of fire blight— a review. Acta Horticulture, 151:195–201.
  8. Begum, M. F., Rahman, M. A. and. Alam, M. F. 2010. Biological control of Alternaria fruit rot of chili by Trichoderma species under field conditions. Mycobiology, 38(2): 113- 117. Büyükyılmaz, M. 1999. Ayva çeşit seçimi. Atatürk Bahçe Kültürleri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü, Proje Kod No: TAGEM /96/06/003, Yayın No:125. Chernin, L., Ismailov, Z., Haran, S. and Chet, I. 1995. Chitinolytic Enterobacter agglomerans antagonistic to fungal plant pathogens. Application Environmental Microbiology, 61(5): 1720-1726.
  9. Chet, I. 1987. Trichoderma application, mode of action, and potential as a biocontrol agent of soilborne plant pathogenic fungi. In: Chet I, Editor, Innovative Approaches to Plant Disease Control, Wiley, NewYork, 137-160.
  10. Droby, S. 2006. Improving quality and safety of fresh fruit and vegetables after harvest by the use of biocontrol agents and natural materials. Acta Horticulturae, 709: 45–51.
  11. Ekinci M., Turan M., Yıldırım E., Güneş A., Kotan R. and Dursun A. 2014. Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on growth, nutrient, organic acid, amino acid and hormone content of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis) transplants. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, 13(6): 71–85.
  12. Ekinci, M., Yıldırım, E. and Kotan, R. 2015. Effects of different plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on growth and quality of broccoli (Brassica oleraceae L. var. italica) se