SavedAdd your journal

Journals / BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL / 2021 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4

Transcanalicular Multidiode Laser Versus External Dacryocystorhinostomy in the Treatment of Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

Mehmet Gökhan ASLAN
Asker BULUT
Veysi ÖNER
Pages
315–319
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The TCLDCR group had a significantly shorter mean surgery time (27.9±5.5 minutes) compared with the EXDCR group (58.5±12.0 minutes) (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study was a comparison of the outcomes of transcanalicular multidiode laser dacryocystorhinostomy (TCLDCR) and external dacryocystorhinostomy (EXDCR) treatment for patients with acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Thirty-one consecutive patients who underwent TCLDCR (TCLDCR group) and 68 consecutive patients who underwent EXDCR (EXDCR group) due to acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction were enrolled in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The TCLDCR group had a significantly shorter mean surgery time (27.9±5.5 minutes) compared with the EXDCR group (58.5±12.0 minutes) (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: This study was a comparison of the outcomes of transcanalicular multidiode laser dacryocystorhinostomy (TCLDCR) and external dacryocystorhinostomy (EXDCR) treatment for patients with acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Methods: Thirty-one consecutive patients who underwent TCLDCR (TCLDCR group) and 68 consecutive patients who underwent EXDCR (EXDCR group) due to acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction were enrolled in the study. Follow-up visits were performed on the first day, and at the first week, first month, third month, sixth month, and every six months thereafter. Surgical success was defined as achievement of a patent osteotomy and a successful bicanalicular silicone intubation during the procedure. Anatomical success was defined by observation of a patent osteotomy on lacrimal irrigation, regardless of epiphora. The surgery time and intra- and postoperative complications were noted for each patient. Results: The TCLDCR group had a significantly shorter mean surgery time (27.9±5.5 minutes) compared with the EXDCR group (58.5±12.0 minutes) (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ASLAN, M. G., BULUT, A., ÖNER, V. (2022). Transcanalicular Multidiode Laser Versus External Dacryocystorhinostomy in the Treatment of Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction. BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4, 315–319. https://ajindex.com/articles/463076

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Doğan M, Alizada A, Yavaş GF, Kahveci OK, Bakan O Laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy in nasolacrimal duct obstruction: 5-year follow-up. Int J Ophthalmol 2018;1:1616–20
  2. Choi KJ, Jang DW, Abi Hachem R Endoscopic endonasal approaches to the orbit. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2018;58:85–99
  3. Stock L, Ungerechts R, Emmerich KH Recanalization of lacrimal duct stenosis by laserdacryoplasty using a diode laser - comparison of success rates using an erbium: YAG laser. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2019;236:163–8
  4. Robert MC, Maleki B, Boulos PR. Endocanalicular laser dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;29:294–7
  5. At'kova EL, Fedorov AA, Root AO, Krakhovetskiy NN, Yartsev VD, Reyn DA, et al. Morphological analysis of reparative process at osteotomy site after endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Vestn Oftalmol 2016;132:87–92
  6. Levin PS, Stormogipson DJ. Endocanalicular laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy. An anatomic study. Arch Ophthalmol 1992;110:1488–90
  7. Eloy P, Trussart C, Jouzdani E, Collet S, Rombaux P, Bertrand B. Transcanalicular diode laser assisted dacryocystorhinostomy. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 2000;54:157–63
  8. Nuhoglu F, Gurbuz B, Eltutar K. Long-term outcomes after transcanalicular laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2012;32:258–62
  9. Drnovsek-Olup B, Beltram M. Transcanalicular diode laser- assisted dacryocystorhinostomy. Indian J Ophthalmol 2010;58:213–7
  10. Akcam HT, Konuk O. Mechanical transnasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy versus transcanalicular multidiode laser dacryocystorhinostomy: long-term results of a prospective study. Lasers Med Sci 2020;36:349–56
  11. Kaynak P, Ozturker C, Yazgan S, Karabulut GO, Akar S, Demirok A, et al. Transcanalicular diode laser assisted dacryocystorhinostomy in primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: 2-year follow up. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;30:28–33
  12. Taşkıran Çömez A, Karadağ O, Arıkan S, Gencer B, Kara S. Comparison of transcanalicular diode laser dacryocystorhinostomy and external dacryocystorhinostomy in patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Lasers Surg Med 2014;46:275–80
  13. Derya K, Demirel S, Doganay S, Orman G, Cumurcu T, Gunduz A. Endoscopic transcanalicular diode laser dacryocystorhinostomy: is it an alternative method to conventional external dacryocystorhinostomy? Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;29:15–7
  14. Balikoglu-Yilmaz M, Yilmaz T, Taskin U, Taskapili M, Akcay