SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 4

Correlation Between Computerized Tomography Findings and DeMeester Score and Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Findings in Patients with GERD-like Symptoms

GERH Benzeri Semptomları Olan Hastalarda Bilgisayarlı Tomografi Bulguları ile DeMeester Skoru ve Özofagogastroduodenoskopi Bulguları Arasındaki İlişki

Süleyman Sönmez
Hakan Yirgin
İnci Kızıldağ Yirgin
Pages
327–333
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The DeMeester score of >14.72 was considered abnormal acid reflux, whereas

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Radiological imaging has a limited role in the initial diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) without complications.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This retrospective study included 46 consecutive patients with typical GERD-related symptoms.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The DeMeester score of >14.72 was considered abnormal acid reflux, whereas
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Radiological imaging has a limited role in the initial diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) without complications. This study aimed to investigate the correlation with the presence of hiatal hernia (HH), the number of hiatal area pixels, the angle of His on computerized tomography (CT) imaging, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) findings, and DeMeester scores in patients with GERD-like symptoms. Methods: This retrospective study included 46 consecutive patients with typical GERD-related symptoms. All patients underwent EGD examinations. Patients were divided into two groups as HH and hiatal insufficiency based on the EGD results. The DeMeester score of >14.72 was considered abnormal acid reflux, whereas

Özet

Amaç: Radyolojik görüntüleme yöntemleri, komplikasyon gelişmemiş gastroözofageal reflü hastalığının (GERH) ilk tanısında sınırlı bir role sahiptir. Bu çalışmada, GERH tanısı bulunan hastalarda hiatal herni (HH) varlığı, hiatal alandaki piksel sayısı, bilgisayarlı tomografi (BT) görüntülemede His açısı, özofagogastroduodenoskopi (EGD) bulguları ve DeMeester skorları arasındaki korelasyonu araştırmayı amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu retrospektif çalışmaya tipik GERH ile ilgili semptomlarla başvuran 23 ila 74 yaşları arasındaki 46 hasta (medyan yaş 46, 24 erkek ve 22 kadın) dahil edildi. Tüm çalışma hastalarına EGD incelemeleri yapıldı. EGD sonuçlarına göre hastalar HH ve hiatal yetmezlik olarak iki gruba ayrıldı. DeMeester skorunun 14.72’den fazla olması anormal asit reflü, 14.72’den az olması normal sonuç olarak kabul edildi. BT’de özofagus boşluğunun anatomik detayları ayrı ayrı kaydedildi. Bulgular: Pearson korelasyon testinde EGD bulguları ile BT görüntüleme bulguları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir korelasyon vardı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

Sönmez, S., Yirgin, H., Yirgin, İ. K. (2022). Correlation Between Computerized Tomography Findings and DeMeester Score and Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Findings in Patients with GERD-like Symptoms. Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 4, 327–333. https://ajindex.com/articles/460013

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Dent J, El-Serag HB, Wallander MA, Johansson S. Epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut 2005;54:710-7
  2. Manning MA, Shafa S, Mehrotra AK, Grenier RE, Levy AD. Role of Multimodality Imaging in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Its Complications, with Clinical and Pathologic Correlation. Radiographics 2020;40:44-71
  3. Kahrilas PJ, Shaheen NJ, Vaezi MF, Hiltz SW, Black E, Modlin IM, et al. American Gastroenterological Association Medical Position Statement on the Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Gastroenterology 2008;135:1383-91
  4. Johnston BT, Troshinsky MB, Castell JA, Castell DO. Comparison of barium radiology with esophageal pH monitoring in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91:1181-5
  5. Gyawali CP, Kahrilas PJ, Savarino E, Zerbib F, Mion F, Smout AJPM, et al. Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus. Gut 2018;67:1351-62
  6. Saleh CM, Smout AJ, Bredenoord AJ. The diagnosis of gastro- esophageal reflux disease cannot be made with barium esophagograms. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2015;27:195-200
  7. Kulinna-Cosentini C, Schima W, Cosentini EP. Dynamic MR imaging of the gastroesophageal junction in healthy volunteers during bolus passage. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25:749-54
  8. Seif Amir Hosseini A, Beham A, Uhlig J, Streit U, Uhlig A, Ellenrieder V, et al. Intra- and interobserver variability in the diagnosis of GERD by real-time MRI. Eur J Radiol 2018;104:14-9
  9. Lambert L, Grusova G, Burgetova A, Matras P, Lambertova A, Kuchynka P. The predictive value of computed tomography in the detection of reflflux esophagitis in patients undergoing upper endoscopy. Clin Imaging 2018;49:97-100
  10. Yildirim D, Ekçi B, Gürses B, Oruç F. Evaluation of the gastro- oesophageal junction: defining the incompetent cardio- oeosophageal angle non-invasively with ultrasound and computerized tomography. J Int Med Res 2011;39:1193-200
  11. Koch OO, Schurich M, Antoniou SA, Spaun G, Kaindlstorfer A, Pointner R, et al. Predictability of hiatal hernia/defect size:is there a correlation between pre- and intraoperative findings? Hernia 2014;18:883-8
  12. Ouyang W, Dass C, Zhao H, Kim C, Criner G; COPDGene Investigators. Multiplanar MDCT measurement of esophageal hiatus surface area: association with hiatal hernia and GERD. Surg Endosc 2016;30:2465-72
  13. DeMeester TR, Wang CI, Wernly JA, Pellegrini CA, Little AG, Klementschitsch P, et al. Technique, indications, and clinical use of