Journals / Anadolu Orman Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Advances in Soil Structure Diagnoses

Toprak Strüktürü Analizinde Gelişmeler

Pages
38–45
Publication Date
2018-08-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated that new technologies would contribute to understanding the micro-heterogeneity of soils and its relation to soil-water dynamics.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It is difficult to understand soil microstructure due to the complexity of the related soil processes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this regard, microCT isused to display 3D morphological properties of undisturbed soil samples in the greatest detail. 3D-printed structures of undisturbed soils are obtained with a resolution of 80 μm with this tecnique.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicated that new technologies would contribute to understanding the micro-heterogeneity of soils and its relation to soil-water dynamics.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Toprak morfolojisi · toprak-su dinamikleri · 3D-baskılı topraklar

Abstract

It is difficult to understand soil microstructure due to the complexity of the related soil processes. To better understand soils, morphological features should be investigated in greater details with the use of advanced technology. New developments and of their combination provide contribution for better evaluation of soil morphological properties and relationships between soil structure and water movement. In multiphase porous materials, qualitative and quantitative information can be collected non-invasively by these methods. With the computer-assisted and nondestructive advanced technology such as computer microtomography (μCT), models which could give more reliable results have been used in the last years. In this regard, microCT isused to display 3D morphological properties of undisturbed soil samples in the greatest detail. 3D-printed structures of undisturbed soils are obtained with a resolution of 80 μm with this tecnique. Experiments showed that more successful results were obtained compared to 2D and/or direct observations and provide high quality images. The results indicated that new technologies would contribute to understanding the micro-heterogeneity of soils and its relation to soil-water dynamics. In this way, using a 3D for imaging of soil structure would be a good tool to develop soil hydraulic models. In this paper, we discussed use of advanced technology in soil structure diagnosis.

Özet

Toprak mikroyapısının anlaşılması ilgili toprak süreçlerinin karmaşıklığı nedeniyle zordur. Toprakları daha iyi anlamakiçin, morfolojik özellikler ileri teknolojilerin kullanılması ile daha detaylı araştırılmalıdır. Bu teknolojilerin yenigelişmeleri ve kombinasyonları, toprak morfolojik özelliklerinin ve toprak yapısı ile su taşınımı arasındaki ilişkilerindaha iyi değerlendirilmesi için katkı sağlar. Çok fazlı gözenekli materyallerde, nicel ve nitel bilgiler bu metotlar ile bozulmadan toplanabilir. Son yıllarda, bilgisayar mikrotomografisi (μCT) gibi bilgisayar destekli ve zararsız gelişmiş teknoloji ile daha güvenilir sonuçlar verebilecek modeller kullanılmıştır. Bu bağlamda, mikroCT bozulmamış toprak numunelerinin 3D’li morfolojik özelliklerini en ayrıntılı şekilde görüntülemek için kullanılmıştır. Bozulmamış toprakların 3D baskılı yapıları, bu teknikle 80 μm'lik bir çözünürlükle elde edilir. Deneyler, 2D ve/veya doğrudan gözlemlere kıyasla daha başarılı sonuçların elde edildiğini ve yüksek kaliteli görüntüler verdiğini göstermiştir. Sonuçlar, yeni teknolojilerin toprakların mikro-heterojenliğini ve toprak-su dinamiği ile olan ilişkisinin anlaşılmasınakatkıda bulunacağını belirtmektedir. Bu şekilde, toprak yapısının görüntülenmesi için bir 3D kullanmak, toprak hidrolik modellerini geliştirmek için iyi bir araç olacaktır. Bu makalede, toprak yapısının teşhisinde ileri teknolojilerin kullanılması tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAHAN, G., EROL, A. S., ERŞAHİN, S. (2018). Advances in Soil Structure Diagnoses. Anadolu Orman Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 38–45. https://ajindex.com/articles/459801

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. REFERENCES Aravena, J. E., Berli, M., Menon, M., Ghezzehei, T.A., Mandava, A.K., Regentova, E.E. 2013. Synchrotron X-ray microtomography—new means to quantify root induced changes of rhizosphere physical properties. in Soil–Water– Root Processes: Advances in Tomography and Imaging. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., Inc. 2013; pp. 39–67.Bacher, M. 2013. 3D-printing of undisturbed soil imaged by X-ray. Master’s Thesis in Environmental Science, SLU Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Soil and Environment, Uppsala 2013.Beraldo, J.M. G., Francisco de A., Scannavino Junior,. Cruvinel, P.E. 2014. Application of x-ray computed tomography in the evaluation of soil porosity in soil management systems. Eng. Agríc., Jaboticabal, v.34, n.6, p. 1162-1174, nov./dez. 2014.Bouma, J. 1982. Measuring the conductivity of soil horizons with continuous macropores. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. Madison, v.46, p.438-441, 1982.Bouma, J. 2001. The new role of soil science in a network society. Soil Science 166, 874– 879.Calistru, A.E., Jităreanu, G. 2015. Applications of X-Ray Computed Tomography for Examining Soil Structure: A Review. Bulletin USAMV series Agriculture 72(1)/2015.Cribb, J. 2010.
  2. The Coming Famine. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood.Cruvinel, P. E., Pereira, M. F. L., Saito, J. H., Costa, L. F. 2009. Performance Improvement of Tomographic Image Reconstruction Based on DSP Processors. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, New York, v. 58, p. 3295-3304, 2009.Cnudde, V., Masschaele, B., Dierick, M., Vlassenbroeck, J., Van Hoorebeke, L., Jacobs, P. 2006. Recent progress in X-ray CT as a geosciences tool. Applied Geochemistry, 2006; 21(5): 826–832.Dal Ferro, N., Morari, F. 2015. "From real soils to 3D-printed soils: reproduction of complex pore network at the real size in a silty-loam soil." Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 79.4 (2015): 1008-1017.
  3. Garbout, A., Munkholm, L.J., Hansen, S.B. 2013. Tillage effects on topsoil structural quality assessed using X-ray CT, soil cores and visual soil evaluation. Soil Tillage Res. 128, 104–109.Helliwell, J.R., Sturrock, C.J., Grayling, K.M., Tracy, S.R., Flavel R.J., Young, I.M. 2013. Applications of X‐ray computed tomography for examining biophysical interactions and structural development in soil systems: a review. European Journal of Soil Science 64(3):279-297.Hunt, A.G., Ewing R.P., Horton, R. 2013. What’s wrong with soil physics? Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 77:1877–1887. doi:10.2136/sssaj2013.01.0020.Karadimitriou, N.K., Hassani