Journals / Bahçe / 2021 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2

INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT ROOTSTOCKS ON SOME QUALITY PARAMETERS OF GRAFTED MELON SEEDLING

AŞILI KAVUN FİDELERİNİN BAZI KALİTE PARAMETRELERİ ÜZERİNE FARKLI ANAÇLARIN ETKİSİ

Journal
Bahçe
Pages
111–117
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of statistical analyses,positive differences were found in the grafted seedlings compared to non-grafted seedlings at these parameters (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was conducted to determine the effects of different rootstocks on some growth characteristics of grafted melonseedlings under greenhouse condition in 2020.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the study, four different rootstocks were used: 1-Ungrafted, 2-Ferro, 3-Maximus and TZ148.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of statistical analyses,positive differences were found in the grafted seedlings compared to non-grafted seedlings at these parameters (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the effects of different rootstocks on some growth characteristics of grafted melonseedlings under greenhouse condition in 2020. In the study, four different rootstocks were used: 1-Ungrafted, 2-Ferro, 3-Maximus and TZ148. Edalı F₁ variety (Cucumis melo var. Edalı F₁) was used as a scion. The experiment was conductedin a completely randomized block design with three replications. Melon and rootstocks seeds were sown on 28.04.2020and rootstock seeds on 03.05.2020, respectively. Grafting was done on 15.05.2020 and was performed through the splicegrafting method. Some growth characteristics studied on melon seedlings were fresh-dry seedling weights (FSW-DSW),stem diameter-height (SD-SH), leaf number-length (LN-LL), fresh-dry root weights (FRW-DRW), root height (RH) andchlorophyll content (CC-SPAD) and some macro-micro nutrient contents. According to the results of statistical analyses,positive differences were found in the grafted seedlings compared to non-grafted seedlings at these parameters (p

Özet

Bu çalışma, 2020 yılında sera koşullarında aşılı kavun fidelerinin bazı büyüme özelliklerine farklı anaçların etkilerini belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Denemede 1-Aşılanmamış, 2-Ferro, 3-Maximus ve TZ148 olmak üzere dört farklı anaç kullanılmıştır. Kalem olarak Edalı F₁ çeşidi (Cucumis melo var. Edalı F₁) seçilmiştir. Deneme tesadüf bloklar halinde üç tekerrürlü olarak kurulmuştur. Kavun tohumları 28.04.2020, anaç tohumları ise 03.05.2020 tarihlerinde ekilmiştir. 15.05.2020 tarihinde aşılama yapılmıştır. Aşılama kotiledon birleştirme yöntemi ile yapılmıştır. Kavun fidelerinde incelenen bazı parametreler; büyüme özellikleri, taze-kuru fide ağırlıkları (FSW-DSW), gövde çapı-yüksekliği (SD-SH), yaprak sayısı ve uzunluğu (LN-LL), taze-kuru kök ağırlıkları (FRW-DRW), kök yüksekliği (RH) ve klorofil içeriği (CCSPAD) ve bazı makro-mikro besin içerikleridir. İstatistiksel olarak bu parametrelerde aşılı fidelerde aşılanmamışlara göre pozitif farklar bulunmuştur (p

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLTEKİN, R., GÖNÜLAL, E., TARI, A. F., ÖZBAHÇE, A., DEMİRCİ, Ş., GÖRGİŞEN, C., KÖSKER, Y. (2022). INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT ROOTSTOCKS ON SOME QUALITY PARAMETERS OF GRAFTED MELON SEEDLING. Bahçe, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2, 111–117. https://ajindex.com/articles/459361

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Alan, O., F. Sen and E. Duzyaman, 2018. The effectiveness of growth cycles on improving fruit quality for grafted watermelon combinations. Food Sci. Technol. 38:270-277
  2. Bantis, F., A. Koukounaras, A.S. Siomos and C. Dangitsis, 2020. Impact of scion and root stock seedling quality selection on the vigor of watermelon-interspecific squash grafted seedlings. Agriculture 10, 326; 2-10
  3. Bulgar, G., G. Villora, D.A. Moreno and L. Romeo, 2000. Improving the mineral nutrition in grafted watermelon plants: nitrogen metabolism. Biologia Plantarum 43(4):607-609
  4. Bremner, J.M., 1996. Nitrogen-total, methods of soil analysis: part III. In: Sparks D.L., Page A.L., Helmke P.A., Loeppert R.H., Soltanpour P.N., Tabatabai M.A., Johnson C.T., Sumner M.E., editors
  5. Ceylan, S., O. Alan and O.L. Elmacı, 2018. Effects of grafting on nutrient element content and yield in watermelon. Ege University Agriculture Faculty Journal, 55(1):67-74
  6. Colla, G., C.M.C. Suãrez, M. Cardarelli and Y. Rouphael, 2010. Improving nitrogen use efficiency in melon by grafting. HortScience 45(4):559-565
  7. Cushman, K., 2006. Grafting techniques for watermelon. Univ. Fla. Inst. Food Agr. Sci. HS1075:1-5
  8. Davis, A.R., P. Perkins-Veazie, Y. Sakata, S. López-Galarza, J.V. Maroto, S.G. Lee, Y.C. Huh, A. Miguel, S.R. King, R. Cohen and Y.M. Lee, 2008. Cucurbit grafting. Critical Rev. Plant Sci. 27:50-74
  9. Edelstein, M., Y. Burger, C. Horev, A. Pora, A. Meir and R. Cohen, 2004. Assessing the effect of genetic and anatomic variation of cucurbita rootstocks on vigour, survival and yield of grafted melon. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 79(3):370-374. 10.Fallik, E., S. Alkalai-Tuvi, D. Chalupowicz, S. Popovsky-Sarid and M. Zaaroor-Presman, 2019. Relationships between rootstock-scion combinations and growing regions on watermelon fruit quality. Agronomy 2019, 9, 536, 2-9. 11.Gaion, L.A., L.T. Braz and R.F. Carvalho, 2017. Grafting in vegetable crops: a great technique for agriculture. International Journal of Vegetable Science 24(1):85-102. 12.Guan, W. and X. Zhao, 2014. Techniques for melon grafting. University of Florida/Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences Extension EDIS publication HS1257. (http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdf files/HS/HS125700.pdf). 13.Guan, W. and X. Zhao, 2015. Effects of grafting methods and root excision on growth characteristics of grafted muskmelon plants. American Society for Horticultural Science 25(6):706-713. 14.Hassell, R.L. and F. Memmott, 2008. Grafting metho