Journals / International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of performance indicators for some drip irrigation systems used in cherry orchards in Ankara province

Pages
172–181
Publication Date
2022-03-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the research, it has been determined that there are important design and application problems in drip irrigation systems.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, performance tests of drip irrigation systems were carried out in cherry orchards of some farmers in Ankara.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Within the scope of the research, Distribution Uniformity, Emission Uniformity, Application Efficiency, Potential and Actual Application Efficiency measurements were made in drip irrigation systems in 10 different cherry orchards.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the research, it has been determined that there are important design and application problems in drip irrigation systems.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Cherry orchard · drip irrigation · irrigation performance

Abstract

In this study, performance tests of drip irrigation systems were carried out in cherry orchards of some farmers in Ankara. Accordingly, measurements were made on the day of irrigation in the lateral and manifold pipes of the drip irrigation systems used by the farmers. Within the scope of the research, Distribution Uniformity, Emission Uniformity, Application Efficiency, Potential and Actual Application Efficiency measurements were made in drip irrigation systems in 10 different cherry orchards. For this purpose, 4 different dripper points were determined on at least 4 lateral lines in each manifold line. Each lateral pipe and dripper point was chosen to be at the beginning of the line, 1/3 of the line, 2/3 of the distance and at the end of the line. Measurements were made on farmers’ irrigation days and under farmer conditions. According to the obtained results, the CU value was between 77.5%- 93.0%, DU value between 60.1%- 86.9%, EU value between 56.7%- 84.5% and CV value between 0.09- 0.28. As a result of the research, it has been determined that there are important design and application problems in drip irrigation systems.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLTEKİN, R., GÖRGİŞEN, C., BİLGEN, G. K., ALSAN, P. B., YETER, T. (2022). Evaluation of performance indicators for some drip irrigation systems used in cherry orchards in Ankara province. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 172–181. https://ajindex.com/articles/765177

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Abdulhadi, J. S., & Alwan, H. H. (2020). Evaluation the existing drip irrigation network of Fadak Farm. Kerbala J. Eng. Sci, 1, 26-38.
  2. Anyoji, H., & Wu, I. P. (1994). Normal distribution water application for drip irrigation schedules. Transactions of the ASAE, 37(1), 159-164. Anonymous, (2021a). General Directorate of Meteorology. Access address: https://www.mgm.gov.tr/. Date of access: 12.07.2021 Anonymous, (2021b). Turkey Statistical Institute. Access address: https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr. Date of access: 12.07.2021 Anonymous, (2022).
  3. Ministry of Agriculture, T. C., & O., 2019. National Water Plan (2019-2023). Access address: https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/SYGM/Belgeler/NHYP%20DEN%C4%B0Z/ULUSAL%20SU%20PLANI.pdf Date of access: 15.03.2022 ASAE Standarts., (1991). Soil and Water Resource Management. s. 554-678,
  4. St. Joseph, MI. USA. ASAE EP458, (1998). Field evaluation of microirrigation systems. ASAE Standards 1998. 45th ed. Standards engineering practices data. ASAE, 2950 Niles Road, St Joseph, Mich., USA. ASAE, (2003). Field evaluation of micro irrigation systems. EP458. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, 760−765 Ashiri M, Boroomand-Nasab S, Hooshmand A (2014). Technical evaluation of drip irrigation systems (case study of shahid rajaayi agro-industry – Dezful). World Rural Observations, 6(3), 36-43
  5. Bhavan M, Maro BSZ (1991). Irrigation equipment and systems, evaluation of field irrigatıon efficiencies, guıdelines. New Delhi, India, 110002 Bralts, V. F., & Kesner, C. D. (1983). Drip irrigation field uniformity estimation. Transactions of the ASAE, 26(5), 1369-1374.
  6. Burt, C.M., Clemmens, A.J., Strelkoff, T.S., Solomon, K.H., Bliesner, R.D., Hardy, L.A., Howell, T.A., Eisenhauer, D.E. (1997). Irrigation Performance Measures: Efficiency and Uniformity. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 123(6):423-442.
  7. Camp, C. R., Sadler, E. J., & Busscher, W. J. (1997). A comparison of uniformity measures for drip irrigation systems. Transactions of the ASAE, 40(4), 1013-1020.
  8. Christiansens JE. (1942). Irrigation by sprinkling. California Agricultural Experiment Station. Bulletin No. 670. Berkeley. Darouich, H. M., Pedras, C. M., Gonçalves, J. M., & Pereira, L. S. (2014). Drip vs. surface irrigation: A comparison focussing on water saving and economic returns using multicriteria analysis applied to cotton. Biosystems engineering, 122, 74-90.
  9. Elamin, A. W. M., Abd Eldaiam, A. M., Abdalla, N. A., & Hussain, M. E. (2017). Hydraulic performance