Journals / ATATÜRK YOLU DERGİSİ / 2019 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 64

AFTER THE FIRST WORLD WAR, "AMERICAN MANDATE" ISSUE IN ANATOLIA AND EFFECTS ON AMERICAN PUBLIC

BİRİNCİ DÜNYA SAVAŞI SONRASINDA ANADOLU’DA “AMERİKAN MANDASI” MESELESİ VE AMERİKAN KAMUOYUNA ETKİLERİ

Pages
267–312
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is expected that this work, which is made up of the documents of American Foreign Relations (FRUS), American periodicals, works written by bureaucrats and politicians of the period and copyrighted works, is expected to contribute to the history of National Struggle and Turkish foreign policy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It was planned that the mandate status planned to be implemented within the framework of the League of Nations Agreement to the nations separated from Germany and the Ottoman Empire after the First World War would be given to the United States in Anatolia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, the Paris Peace Conference and the delegations commissioned by President Wilson have been found in research in Anatolia.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is expected that this work, which is made up of the documents of American Foreign Relations (FRUS), American periodicals, works written by bureaucrats and politicians of the period and copyrighted works, is expected to contribute to the history of National Struggle and Turkish foreign policy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

It was planned that the mandate status planned to be implemented within the framework of the League of Nations Agreement to the nations separated from Germany and the Ottoman Empire after the First World War would be given to the United States in Anatolia. In this context, the Paris Peace Conference and the delegations commissioned by President Wilson have been found in research in Anatolia. The American public, who has been opposed to the banquets planned to be implemented in Anatolia since the beginning of the peace talks, has contributed to the rejection of President Wilson's mandate design by influencing the American Congress. In this article, it will be examined how American public opinion refers to the debate on the mandate status, which started in particular through Armenia under the name of "Turkish Question", and how it turned into the whole of Anatolia and the Istanbul mandate. In this context, it is planned that American press, power and opposition approaches in the period and American-Allied relations will be analyzed. It is expected that this work, which is made up of the documents of American Foreign Relations (FRUS), American periodicals, works written by bureaucrats and politicians of the period and copyrighted works, is expected to contribute to the history of National Struggle and Turkish foreign policy.

Özet

Birinci Dünya Savaşından sonra Almanya ve Osmanlı İmparatorluğundan ayrılanmilletlere, Milletler Cemiyeti Sözleşmesi kapsamında uygulanması planlanan mandastatüsü Anadolu’da Amerika Birleşik Devletleri’ne verilmesi planlanmıştır. Bukapsamda, Paris Barış Konferansı ile Başkan Wilson tarafından görevlendirilenHeyetler, Anadolu'da araştırmalarda bulunmuştur. Barış görüşmelerinin başındanberi Anadolu'da uygulanması planlanan manda statüsüne karşı olan Amerikankamuoyu, Kongreyi de etkileyerek manda tasarısının reddedilmesine katkıdabulunmuştur. Bu makalede, Amerikan kamuoyunun “Türk Sorunu” ve “Türk Barışı”olarak ele aldığı manda meselesine yönelik tartışmalar ele alınmıştır. Amerikankamuoyu özelde Ermenistan üzerinden başlayan manda statüsü tartışmalarına bakışaçısı ve konunun Anadolu’nun tamamı ve İstanbul mandası tasarısına nasıl dönüştüğüincelenecektir. Bu kapsamda, dönemin Amerikan basını, iktidar ve muhalefetinmeseleye yaklaşımları ve ayrıca Amerika-Müttefik ilişkilerinin tahlil edilmesiplanlanmaktadır. Amerikan Dış ilişkileri belgeleri (The Foreign Relations of theUnited States (FRUS), Amerikan süreli yayınları, dönemin bürokrat ilesiyasetçilerinin yazdığı eserler ve diğer telif-tetkik eserlerden istifade edilerekoluşturulan bu çalışmanın Milli Mücadele dönemi ve Türk dış politikası tarihiliteratürüne katkı yapması beklenmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖĞRETEN, C. (2022). AFTER THE FIRST WORLD WAR, "AMERICAN MANDATE" ISSUE IN ANATOLIA AND EFFECTS ON AMERICAN PUBLIC. ATATÜRK YOLU DERGİSİ, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 64, 267–312. https://ajindex.com/articles/456691

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (26)

  1. The Foreign Relations of the United States (FRUS), The Paris Peace Conference 1919,
  2. III, The Council of Ten Minutes of Meetinngs January 12 to February 14, 1919.
  3. FRUS, The Paris Peace Conference 1919,
  4. III, The Prelimanary Peace Confernece: Minutes of the Plenary Sessions, 1919.
  5. FRUS, The Paris Peace Conference 1919,
  6. IV, The Council of Ten: minutes of meetings February 15 to June 17, 1919.
  7. FRUS, The Paris Peace Conference 1919, V, The Council of Four: minutes of meetings March 20 to May 24, 1919.
  8. FRUS, Paris Peace Conference, 1920 V, The Secretary of State to the French Ambassador (Jusserand) 24 March 1920.
  9. FRUS, The Peace Conference Vol. XII, The American Section of the Interntional Commission on Mandates in Turkey (The King-Crane Commission), 1919. FRUS, 1920,
  10. Vol.III, Turkey. Akşin, Sina, İç Savaş ve Sevr’de Ölüm, Türkiye İş Bankası Yayınları, 2010, İstanbul, s. 105. Aydemir, Şevket Süreyya, Tek Adam C.II., Remzi Kitabevi, İstanbul, 2014.
  11. Ayışığı, Metin, Kurtuluş Savaşı Sırasında Türkiye’ye Gelen Amerikan Heyetleri, Türk Tarih Kurumu, Ankara, 2004. Baker R. S., ve Dodd, W. E., Woodrow Wilson, War and Peace: Presidential Messages, Public Papers, V.II, New York, 1927.
  12. Bulut, Sedef, “Paris Barış Konferansı”, E.Semih Yalçın (Ed.) Türk İnkılap Tarihi ve Atatürk İlkeleri, (159-166)
  13. Berikan Yayınevi, Akara, 2011.
  14. Churchill, Winston, The World Crisis the Aftermath, Thornton Butterworth Limited, London, 1929.
  15. De Novo, John A., American İnterests and Policies in The Middle East (1900- 1939),
  16. University of Minnesota Press, Minnesota, 1963, s.118. Dillion, E.J., The Inside Story of The Peace Conference, Harper and Brothers Publishers, New York, 1920.
  17. Erol, Mine, Türkiye’de Amerikan Mandası Meselesi 1919-1920,
  18. İleri Basımevi, Giresun, 1972.
  19. Evans, Laurance, Türkiye’nin Parçalanması ve ABD Politikası (1914-1924),
  20. Örgün Yayınevi, İstanbul, 2004.
  21. Gelvin, James L., Modern Orta Doğu Tarihi 1453-2015,
  22. Timaş Yayınları, İstanbul, 2016.
  23. Harbord, Maj. Gen. James G., Conditions in the Near East. Report of the American Military Mission to Armenia, Government Prıntıng Offıce, Washington, 1920, Doc.No 266. Helmreich, Paul. C., Sevr Entrikaları- Büyük Güçler Maşalar, Gizli Anlaşmalar ve Türkiye’nin Taksimi, Sabah Kitapları, İstanbul, 1996.
  24. Hoover, Herbert, The Ordeal of Woodrow Wilson, New York, 1961.
  25. Howard, Harry N., The Partition of Turkey, A Diplomatic History 1913-1923, New York, 1966.
  26. Kansu, Mazhar Müfit, Erzurum’dan Ölümüne Kadar Atatürk’le Beraber C.II., Atatürk Kültür, Dil